- News

Tandem hearse blues as funeral home struggles to fulfil late cyclist’s wish for “final ride” to burial spot with friends; Shocking video shows Aussie cyclist run over by lorry driver cutting across bike lane; London bike theft map + more on the live blog
SUMMARY

London bike thefts — mapped


This one’s for the very niche intersection of cartophiles and cyclists… or just cyclists trying to figure out how to keep their bikes safe.
The interactive map, put together by The London Spy, can be filtered by total bike theft volumes or as rate compared to cycling in census, with the latter serving as a good indicator of the risk of having your bike stolen in the area. Perhaps, a bit too topical after last evening’s news…
You can check out the map by clicking here.
Remco Evenepoel becomes a victim of dooring from a postal truck driver during training ride in Belgium


Pictures from Belgium show Soudal-Quick Step rider and Paris Olympic double champion being treated by paramedics and helped towards an ambulance.
“It shouldn’t be a death-defying fiasco to get around”: Shocking video shows cyclist run over by corner-cutting lorry driver despite being on bike lane, weeks after Sky News Australia called for “all bikes to be banned from roads”
Australia — The land which brought all of us Mad Max, does seem to have quite a bit of fury on its roads…
A shocking dashcam footage from a driver shared on Reddit shows an “insane close call”where the rider was “lucky to escape death”, at an intersection which cyclists have described as the “worst in Melbourne” where “lines don’t mean anything”.
In the video, the cyclist can be seen cycling slowly onto the bike lane, but then a lorry driver decides to cut him off and the rider is forced to move aside to give way. But even as the cyclist hugs the pavement, the driver apparently completely misjudges the corner, and proceeds to trample the rider’s bike and injure him as well, even mounting the pavement.
From DashCamOwnersAustralia… always assume the worst around trucks
byu/ruinawish inmelbournecycling
The footage was captioned: “This was at corner of Docklands Hwy and Lorimer St, Melbourne VIC on 26/11/2024. The trailer truck drove over bicycle and lucky the cyclist wasn’t injured. I horned the truck at the next intersection and he looked at me and drove off when the light turned green. I drove back to the scene and police took a statement and this video.”
Australian news Network 10 reported that “the 58-year-old cyclist was taken to hospital with minor injuries”.
The post, initially made on r/melbournecyclists and then cross-posted to r/melbourne (by a brave soul, might I add), has garnered loads of reactions from people. If you’ve got any idea of how popular cycling discourse is shaped in Australia, I assume you’d probably know the inclination of the comments on the latter subreddit, but most cyclists were empathetic towards the rider in the video, some even dispirited with the drivers.
“Hope he loses his license and gets charged. I am sick of these f***heads on the road. That poor guy would have been so frightened. I was almost killed by a truck and immediately went out and bought a dashcam. It shouldn’t be a death defying fiasco to get around this city. Good on you for trying and for caring.”
“Dashed white line, truck driver must give way to vehicles already in the lane, plus must give way to a bike in a bike lane. The bike is already there, so fail to give way not to mention leaving the scene of an accident.”
“F*** poor bugger, minding his own business and then that happens. Hoping for a speedy recovery and no lasting damage.”
“That’s a hit and run. That driver needs to be charged as such. That could’ve easily ended that cyclists or pedestrians life. It could’ve ended my life.”
Another person shared an account of similar incident that happened to them, writing: “This happened to me but I got cut off by the cab of the truck and I fell and wend under. Landed on my back and saw the trucks rear wheel coming and I rolled out from underneath just in time. The bike got taken down the street with the truck. Only then did he stop when he felt the bike go under. So lucky.”
Meanwhile, this intersection has already come under scrutiny from the Victorian Transport Association, who in 2017 called on authorities to rethink the plan to create an on-road bicycle path on Lorimer Street in Port Melbourne.
VTA CEO Peter Anderson said: “While we fully support infrastructure that encourages commuters onto bikes and away from cars, the last place we should be putting a shared path is on the only gazetted freight route servicing the south side of the Port of Melbourne.
“It’s an irresponsible recipe for disaster to encourage cycling on a road so intensively used by heavy vehicles, and is the precise opposite of what we recommended in early consultations.
“For planners to have included an on-road cycling path on Lorimer Street in the draft framework defies logic.”
This news comes just a couple weeks after Sky News Australia’s notorious segment about cyclists, in which a panel of ill-informed presenters called for “all bikes to be banned from all roads forever” — after a “crazy near miss” on Main South Road in Adelaide, involving two car drivers, a lorry driver, and a cyclist on a recumbent tricycle.
Co-host Caroline Marcus, exhibiting his accurate knowledge and research about recumbent bikes, said: “What the hell was that person thinking riding… it looks like a kid’s toy, these trikes.”
Meanwhile, Kel Richards claimed: “Not some, ban all bikes from all roads, forever – simple solution. It’s the only intelligent solution… You can never have bicycles mixing with steel traffic, it can never be safe. But they think they’re so morally good, because they’re saving the planet remember, and they’re safe because they’re in Lycra.”
Not to be a dark cloud of pessimism on a Tuesday morning, but with media spouting non-sense like this, it doesn’t fill me with much hope for cycling in Australia…
“No comment” from Colnago about the leaked photos of “Y1 RS”, Tadej Pogačar's new aero race bike


After lots of speculation and split reaction (“even uglier than a Bianchi Oltre” was one sentiment), Italian brand Colnago has shared its official position on the leaks with road.cc, and it’s a “no comment”.
We caught wind of the leaked Y1 RS after grainy images that look to have been taken in a studio surfaced, showing what appears to potentially serve as UAE Team Emirates and Tadej Pogačar’s upcoming aero race bike, while Colnago also teased the design on its Instagram page.
UAE Team Emirates currently use the Colnago V4RS as their do-it-all bike, but the Y1RS could be the Italian brand’s new aero-specific bike. Colnago has generally shied away from the full-blooded aero road bike in recent years, its last attempt at the genre coming in 2016 with the Colnago Concept.
Dangerous bus driver banned from driving for a year after hitting 13-year-old cyclist "into the road" before fleeing the scene


Is Tadej Pogačar already reconning Milan-San Remo?
Soudal Quick-Step issues update on Remco Evenepoel’s condition after his training ride "dooring" collision


Fractures to rib, right shoulder blade and his right hand… that doesn’t sound very good.
Read the full story: > Remco Evenepoel taken to hospital after ‘colliding with swinging door of postal truck’ while training
The Wahoo ELEMNT ACE — Bigger, but is it better?
Late cyclist’s wish for a “final ride” to burial spot with friends thrown into jeopardy as funeral home struggles to find a tandem hearse
A funeral company in Birmingham is appealing for a tandem hearse, a special bicycle with a coffin rack, so that a late man’s wish to go on a “final four-mile ride” with his four friends to the spot where he’ll be buried can be fulfilled.
A Natural Undertaking, a Birmingham-based company that offers bespoke funerals, said that it has looked across the length and breath of the country in search of the special bike.
The BBC reports that Kerri Deeley, an undertaker at the company, had found a company that could supply a tandem hearse in October, when she first met the man to discuss his funeral. However, after he died, the tandem hearse has unfortunately gone out of service needing repairs.
“I’ve literally tried the length and breadth of Britain to try and locate another one,” she told BBC Radio WM, adding that they were hoping that the public can help them with any leads.


The company often works with people who are terminally ill and want to plan a unique funeral. Ms Deeley said they had organised fancy dress and biker-themed memorials – and even one event where the deceased person asked to be dressed as a clown.
“It’s a nice memory to have for the family. They’ve done what they can to make their loved one’s final journey how they want it to be,” she said. “It’s such a fulfilling job. When we get into the cars afterwards, we look at ourselves and think: ‘We did that, we made that wish come true’.”
Live blog readers, if you know anyone with a tandem hearse who’s gracious enough to lend it to the funeral house and help a cyclist ride one last time with his mates, get in touch with A Natural Undertaking.
Help us to bring you the best cycling content
If you’ve enjoyed this article, then please consider subscribing to road.cc from as little as £2.49. Our mission is to bring you all the news that’s relevant to you as a cyclist, independent reviews, impartial buying advice and more. Your subscription will help us to do more.
17 Comments
Read more...
Read more...
Read more...
Latest Comments
Similarly, I read some of what certain commenters write on here and think "they must be on something". And they often end up getting banned, too. (Although the comparison does break down when it comes to the 'great performances'.)
In January 2020 a driver knocked me off my bike. I wasn't wearing a helmet (sometimes I do, sometimes I don't) and I had a nasty cut on my head, which I had glued at hospital, but no concussion and nothing more serious. All of my friends berated me for not wearing a helmet. This summer, I was on a waterslide in Italy and was thrown from the rubber ring I was sitting on and smashed my head against the water slide. I had a massive goose egg and a cut head. Again, no concussion, but I would say it was a worse bang then when I'd been knocked off the bike. Not one person suggested I should have been wearing a helmet.
If we're after more safety for people on roads, should there be a new law that requires all drivers and passengers to wear full motor-racing helmets? Including the HANS device: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HANS_device This would require the seatbelts to also mirror those in racing cars. And for all pedestrians to move around in Zorb balls too.
Isn't this broadly just saying even the pros are like Jimmy the weekend warrior who can't believe anyone can beat them unless they are doing something dodgy. As he said, he went from one team to another and the new team thought his old team were maybe doing something dodgy. He knew they weren't. This isn't raising the question of "are they all doping in the pro peleton", I would argue its doing the opposite. Suggesting that its just natural for everyone to be suspicious of great performances even within the top top levels. Everyone sitting there saying "we're not doing anything dodgy but maybe team A are" and team A are sitting over there saying "we're not doing anything dodgy but maybe team B are".
[Not sure why that's a reply - it wasn't meant to be. 🤷♂️]
Some very interesting information on this in their FAQs:
The context for that is The cars *entering the route* might have been 'an incident' in the sense that they both entered from the same point at the same time, one turning towards the rider and one away.
Why would I want to pay even more to be a muppet Bleeqer to some Dr. Musk's mad scientist?
AN incident? It was TWO completely separate incidents.
@ajuk.uk@gmail.com As we've discussed previously managing driver behaviour *is* complex (because humans). But even where e.g. lower "blanket limits" are being decried (is that the objection to "traffic calming by fiat"?) a) the statistics show that average speed does come down and b) deaths and injuries are reduced *. Sounds *measurably* good, no? Recall: the focus is on speed in urban / populous settings. Or at least where there is likely to be significant interaction of vulnerable road users (pedestrians to a first approximation) and motorists. ** What are the down-sides? (Leaving aside much wider arguments about individual autonomy and "state control"). Well, delays to *motor traffic* are usually very strongly discouraged - both for "common sense" reasons ("vital emergency services" through "time is money" and then the usually less evidenced "pollution increases"). That's also built in to many of our government metrics (e.g. "must have a minimal negative impact on journey times" for road changes, building new developments etc.) However reducing the speed limits does not always greatly increase journey times. Of course that varies with locality and specifics since the reasons again are complicated (traffic flow smoothing, re-routing of traffic, "traffic evaporation"). * The statistics as always should be scrutinised - but at worst it seems like what would have been deaths become serious injuries and probably some of what would have been serious injuries become less serious and "not reported" - so if deaths come down but serious injuries go up I'd say that's expected and a win. Why does this happen even if all that changes is a number on a sign (which is a poor way to change behaviour, agreed) - possibly because psychology (anchoring effect) and also that some people slowing down will often physically impede and hence slow down others? ** Of course this isn't the only way of addressing issues arising from motorist speed (which are not just of danger - also of noise pollution etc.) There are also things like grade-separation and ultimately fixing the network (different routes). And this could mean building more roads...
17 thoughts on “Tandem hearse blues as funeral home struggles to fulfil late cyclist’s wish for “final ride” to burial spot with friends; Shocking video shows Aussie cyclist run over by lorry driver cutting across bike lane; London bike theft map + more on the live blog”
That’s really scary – I’m not
That’s really scary – I’m not sure what else the cyclist could have done, and they were very lucky.
The truck driver approached from behind and overtook them, so nobody can claim ‘undertaking’. If they claim they didn’t see the cyclist then they ought to have their licence taken away (do Australians have driving licences?).
And if the worse had happened, you just know that the focus of the Australian media would have been simply on whether he was wearing a helmet.
I would love to know whether the Australian police actually followed this up, and what happened next.
And, the first couple of Insta comments…
brooksby wrote:
Absolutely not a victim blaming – the blame lies 100% with the driver of the truck – but I’ve been stuck in that position too many times in London, stopping and hoping that the back end of the truck won’t get me; now as soon as I recognise that the idiot either hasn’t seen me or has seen me but just doesn’t care I’m straight onto the pavement. On one occasion when the kerb was too high to bunnyhop and it was too late (fast moving truck) to unclip I just threw myself sideways onto the pavement; got a few grazes and bruises but better than ending up like someone I used to know who got caught in that very position with their leg pulled into the wheel and being effectively degloved from knee to ankle, necessitating many, many years of painful surgeries and a permanent disability. Of course it’s easy to be wise from behind a keyboard and again, it’s absolutely not the cyclist’s fault that they got hit, that’s just my way of dealing with it these days.
Even the Archers are getting
Even the Archers are getting on the speeding cyclists theme…
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m0025kl2
Apparently, cyclists (well, e
Apparently, cyclists (well, e-bikers) are not exempt from speed limits in Borsetshire. Dan Archer and Walter Gabriel were not heard or mentioned in this episode
To be fair, characters in a
To be fair, characters in a drama are by definition unreliable information sources.
Karlt wrote:
… but probably more reliable than a lot of actual characters! 🙂
wtjs wrote:
Nor was Pru Forrest.
Hey – No Archers spoilers
Hey – No Archers spoilers please!
A tandem hearse sounds like
A tandem hearse sounds like either it would be massive, or severely underpowered, or both?
Not a tandem hearse but (for anyone else wondering about such a service) a Google shows you can get what is a heavy-duty cargo trike for hearse hire.
Or even one of these trailers (as reviewed in the sister site eBikeTips)? Cargo capacity of 200kg should have you covered for almost everyone? Other less fancy but still heavy duty ones are available e.g. Surly do one if you can get it.
I was thinking of a Surly
I was thinking of a Surly Bill hooked up to any standard tandem.
Richard Ballantine had a
Richard Ballantine had a bicycle hearse back in 2013 (cue ‘where does the time go?’ comments). As I recall it was just a trailer with some decoration.
I built up an old classic
I built up an old classic type general purpose bike so I could leave it outside the shops and nobody would steal it – so what happened? lots of people told me what a fantastic bike it is, and when I was on the train at Twickenham somebody tried to steal it!
Driver disqualified for
Driver disqualified for knocking cyclist off bike by ‘passing too closely’…
https://www.thamesvalley.police.uk/news/thames-valley/news/2024/november/11.11.24/man-disqualified-from-driving–oxford/
So, passing too close would
So, passing too close would now seem to mean, well, actually hitting a cyclist and breaking their arm.
I’m not sure the verb ‘pass’ is accurate in that case. I could be wrong but I think the correct verb could possibly be ‘hit‘.
And the more I think about it, well, I think I may just be correct. But who knows, I’ve read 1984 (or Nineteen Eighty-Four) so I may be entirely wrong…
Yes! Nineteen Eighty-Four is
Yes! Nineteen Eighty-Four is where the police learn to construct their publicity releases and other statements: our thoughts and prayers are with…we have taken action…etc
Quote:
“Inconsiderate” not dangerous then! Well it was a cyclist and we all know killing a cycist is considered “careless” so may be “inconsiderate” for injuring one is about right.
Plans have been unveiled for
Plans have been unveiled for a new £4,500,000 cycle lane that will cross the City of London.
The route will stretch from Aldgate Square in the east to Blackfriars in the west – roughly the furthest points apart from where the London Wall once stood.