Jeremy Vine says near miss was “closest I’ve come to dying on my bicycle”; Tour of Antalya calamity; Cav chalks up first victory of 2022; Why not walk or cycle? Because you ripped out the bike lane!; What’s a ‘carsplainer’? + more on the live blog
SUMMARY
‘Carsplaining’ – think it’ll catch on?
We all know a particular kind of motorist, the one who usually pops up in the Daily Mail comments section or on talk radio to pontificate about how cyclists are always breaking red lights, riding 73-abreast, not paying road tax, and generally causing a menace on our roads and frightening defenceless, law-abiding car drivers.
Well, thanks to active travel campaigner Adam Bronkhorst, we now have a handy catch-all term for these motorists – ‘carsplainers’ (although I’m sure you could think of a few other terms).
According to Bronkhorst’s definition on Urban Dictionary, carsplaining is “when someone who never rides a bike explains road safety to cyclists”.
His example sentence is pretty spot on: “He doesn’t ride a bike but said, in true ‘carsplaining’ fashion, that ‘all cyclists need to do to be safe on the roads and avoid any ‘accidents’ is to follow the Highway Code’.”
I made another submission to @urbandictionary
CARSPLAINING – When someone who never rides a bike explains road safety to cyclists. pic.twitter.com/m1Sg7EvPvD
— Adam Bronkhorst (@AdamBronkhorst) February 10, 2022
It seems Adam’s definition immediately pushed the buttons of a few carsplainers:
Great example of the kind of nasty stereotyping that is used to belittle cyclists, and just helps create animosity on the roads thereby making them less safe.
— Adam Bronkhorst (@AdamBronkhorst) February 10, 2022
Others suggested helpful additions to his example sentence (presumably taken from the Big Book of Cycling Bingo beloved by road.cc readers):
You missed off the bit where they begin the sentence with “as a cyclist myself” 😅
— ALF (@Falco_ALF) February 10, 2022
Think it’ll catch on? And what other examples can you think of for carsplaining?
Jeremy Vine says high speed near miss was “the closest I've come to dying on my bicycle”
Not meaning to overdramatise — but having properly looked at this video, I now think it’s the closest I’ve come to dying on my bicycle since I started cycling in London ten years ago. And it shows that you can die without doing a single thing wrong, or ever knowing what hit you. https://t.co/HqDnIGTmQG
— Jeremy Vine (@theJeremyVine) February 10, 2022
Just when you thought a taxi driver throwing a glass bottle at a cyclist would be the worst thing Jeremy Vine caught on camera this month…
The pedalling presenter’s commute to work, now captured on his 360 helmet cam, has acquainted him with many a dodgy driver over the past decade.
However, this near miss from yesterday morning, Vine says, is “the closest I’ve come to dying on my bicycle since I started cycling in London ten years ago”.
The footage – which is particularly shocking when viewed from the back – captures a driver speeding past a lorry in a 20mph zone as they approach Vine in the same lane. The motorist, who only seems to spot the broadcaster at the last second, dramatically swerves, narrowly avoiding both Vine and the lorry.
According to the Radio 2 presenter, this alarming near miss “shows that you can die without doing a single thing wrong, or ever knowing what hit you.”
Cav takes debut win of 2022 in Oman – does the road to 35 begin here?
Ladies and gentlemen, @MarkCavendish‘s 157th pro victory!
Photo: @GettySport pic.twitter.com/FBDaIB3mhB
— Quick-Step Alpha Vinyl Team (@qst_alphavinyl) February 11, 2022
That didn’t take long, did it?
After being thwarted by Fernando Gaviria in yesterday’s opening stage of the Tour of Oman, Mark Cavendish made sure that lightning didn’t strike twice, taking his first win of 2022 – and the 157th professional victory of his career – with what appeared to be a convincing victory on stage two.
I say ‘what appeared to be’ because – apart from a short video taken on the line by journalist Sophie Smith – we didn’t actually see any of the stage. While the helicopter missed the shot of the finish line yesterday, today it missed the entire race, meaning there was no live footage available for us online diehards.
Mark Cavendish wins stage two of the Tour of Oman. #TourofOman pic.twitter.com/qrlNrsJ8mr
— Sophie Smith (@SophieSmith86) February 11, 2022
Still a win’s a win, whether it’s on TV or not, and Cavendish will be pleased that his form appears to be on track as he attempts to convince QuickStep-Alpha Vinyl boss Patrick Lefevere to pick him for what could be a very historic Tour de France.
The omens look good: today’s stage in Oman was the Manx Missile’s earliest win since 2018 (or 2013, if you go by number of race days) and, with Gaviria finishing fourth on the day, means Cavendish takes over the race leader’s jersey.
The road to 35 might well now be under way – it’s just a pity barely anyone could see the beginning of it…
Very accurate…
How am currently feeling… pic.twitter.com/ycxhoLqCO9
— Thomas O. Cornwallis (@UrbanistTOC) February 11, 2022
French teams secure final Tour de France wildcard spots
💛 #TDF2022 team selection 💛
✅ The 18 UCI WorldTeams
✅ 🇧🇪@AlpecinFenix and 🇫🇷@Arkea_Samsic, 1st and 2nd placed UCI ProTeams in 2021
✅ 🇫🇷@BBHOTELS_KTM and 🇫🇷@TeamTotalEnrg, invited by the organizers.
🤩 See you in July! pic.twitter.com/WFbdyGUy1l
— Tour de France™ (@LeTour) February 11, 2022
It seems to get earlier and earlier each year, but it’s that time already – the final two wildcard invitations to the 2022 Tour de France have been awarded!
And to the great surprise of many, two French teams – TotalEnergies and B&B Hotels p/b KTM – have filled the remaining non-WorldTour slots in the 22-team Tour peloton. Pro-Conti Alpecin-Fenix and Arkéa-Samsic were already automatically confirmed as wildcards owing to their position in the UCI rankings.
TotalEnergies, who have raced their home grand tour every year since 2000, were strengthened over the winter with the arrival of Peter Sagan, while Franck Bonnamour and new signing Alexis Gougeard will be under pressure to deliver for a now Bryan Coquard-less B&B Hotels.
Though the selection of two French squads by Tour organisers ASO is hardly a shock, some pundits and fans took to Twitter to express their disappointment that Uno-X missed out on a starting berth at cycling’s biggest race.
I think everyone agrees that Uno-X would be more attractive at the moment but yes French team, French race. Its the law
— José Been (@TourDeJose) February 11, 2022
The Norwegian team has eight Danish riders on its roster and, with the Tour’s Grand Départ taking place in Copenhagen this year, was targeting a spot on the start line after a strong 2021. As a consolation prize, ASO has invited Uno-X to June’s Critérium du Dauphiné, the traditional Tour warm-up race.
How’s this for a bunnyhop, Mathieu?
Or should that be an alligator-hop?
Smartphone-controlled 'Bicycle Storage Pods' unveiled at New York's Grand Central Terminal to encourage cycling
If you’re one of a lot of cyclists who has fallen victim to theft or vandalism when leaving your bike unattended at lacklustre facilities at your local train station, you might be looking on in envy at these new bike pods installed at Grand Central in New York.
Janno Leiber, the chair of New York’s Metropolitan Transportation Authority, says the pods will help encourage commuters to consider making that “last mile connection” by bike rather than using less efficient transportation.
The pods appear to have racks for multiple bikes, and users unlock it with their smartphone. Let’s hope no particularly enterprising thieves decide to sign up and take their pick from what’s inside…
Why don't cyclists use the cycle lane? Because it got ripped out, that's why
This tongue-in-cheek addition to a sign encouraging Bolton locals to walk and cycle is in referenced to the region’s underwhelming active travel campaign, after a widened cycle lane with wands segregating it was removed from Chorley New Road after it proved unpopular with angry residents/people who want to drive everywhere.
According to the Bolton News, the original sign was put in around the time the segregated cycle lane was installed with cash from the Emergency Active Travel scheme, that saw extra cycling and walking provisions built across the country as part of the pandemic response.
Unfortunately this one was an example of on that was ripped out due to a backlash, such as the Old Shoreham Cycle Lane in Hove. The council says it doesn’t intend to reinstall the cycle lane despite the sign suggesting at least one resident thinks the removal is somewhat contradictory.
Cllr Andy Morgan told Bolton News: “Following the consultation in regards to the cycle lanes on Chorley Old Road, we removed the orca wands in light of what the majority of the public wanted.
“We weren’t going to go back on doing it after people pushed for it to be removed.
“We encourage people to still cycle because cycle lanes are still there and are a lot bigger.
“The orca wands blocked the roads when turning right and cause a lot of traffic congestion.
“I have laughed about the sign though, which is quite comical.”
Almost as comical as your active travel scheme, Cllr Morgan…
Photo: Henry Lisowski
Why all the Highway Code fake news? Catch up with the road.cc Podcast
On episode 18 we’re chatting those all important Highway Code changes, and Mat gets to nerd out on cycling shoes with Alex Malone of Bont.
Simon also talks to Tim Lennon of the Richmond Cycling Campaign, who talks about the bizarre media coverage after this shocking video of a close pass on his daughter did the rounds on Twitter:
Why would anyone be this much of a shit to an adult, let alone a little girl?! Why is getting in front worth that?
(Video: @lucullus) pic.twitter.com/5avckGgfLD— Rory Meakin (@rorymeakin) February 2, 2022
Catch up with the episode over here.
More reaction to Jeremy Vine's shocking footage
Not meaning to overdramatise — but having properly looked at this video, I now think it’s the closest I’ve come to dying on my bicycle since I started cycling in London ten years ago. And it shows that you can die without doing a single thing wrong, or ever knowing what hit you. https://t.co/HqDnIGTmQG
— Jeremy Vine (@theJeremyVine) February 10, 2022
This is the argument I make often against the use of mirrors. Do you really wham to see what’s going on behind you? And would it make a difference?
— Righttobikeit (@righttobikeit) February 10, 2022
From the front view I thought you were being overdramatic. From the rear I see your point. I don’t think he saw you late, it was just haste to undertake the lorry.
— James Metcalfe (@JamesMe08634687) February 11, 2022
Christ, that’s horrendous. And not overdramatizing at all.
— Ellie Pyemont 🚢🧡 (@elliepyemont) February 10, 2022
The broadcaster’s footage doesn’t at first look like one of the worst pieces of driving we’ve seen in our Near Miss of the Day series over the years – but from behind it makes for particularly troubling viewing.
Another of Vine’s recent recordings has been pulled from Twitter as the police are now involved. Hopefully they catch up with the driver in the above clip too…
Please note. This film has been removed because the driver is now subject to police action. pic.twitter.com/FjJKhDYeyT
— Jeremy Vine (@theJeremyVine) February 10, 2022
Instant karma from Down Under
This Aussie cyclist was miffed to have to stop for a driver turning left into a side road, despite the pretty clear ‘no left turn’ arrow.
As you’ll see from the rear camera in the second half of the clip, it looks like they were dealt with by an officer in the right place at the right time.
The poster added: “Unfortunately this enforcement is very sporadic and doesn’t scale very well. That road goes to the freeway, so the cop can’t just turn back and quickly do it again. They need to do a big loop so tend to only do it once or twice a day, probably at the end of their shift on the way back to the station.”
UCI slammed after Tour of Antalya peloton forced to avoid police roadblock
Thank us later, @OutOfCycling! 😏 pic.twitter.com/loqt9DSROa
— ABLOC Continental Team (@ABLOC_CT) February 11, 2022
Don’t think this was part of the course? Somehow race organisers didn’t manage to communicate that something was clearly occurring up ahead, and an oblivious peloton just about managed to steer itself over a grass verge and onto the other side of the road to avoid a major pile-up.
A cheeky impromptu gravel section or simply an organisational cock-up of the highest order? We reckon this just about sums up what happened during the route planning for this stage…
The stage route map: https://t.co/NchChW0OHp pic.twitter.com/7GgLZtNlyd
— Belinda (@reallyspoketome) February 11, 2022
11 February 2022, 09:44
Check out the latest episode of the road.cc Pod, featuring yours truly…
Highway Code changes, plus father of child almost hit by Range Rover driver while cycling on the road.cc Podcast episode 18
We put the record straight on road rule changes misreported elsewhere, talk shoe tech with our Podcast sponsor, and road safety with parent and cycling campaigner
Help us to bring you the best cycling content
If you’ve enjoyed this article, then please consider subscribing to road.cc from as little as £1.99. Our mission is to bring you all the news that’s relevant to you as a cyclist, independent reviews, impartial buying advice and more. Your subscription will help us to do more.
50 Comments
Read more...
Read more...
Read more...
Latest Comments
The defence may well have argued that, and the magistrate may have accepted it, but that's not what the law says. It says that you have only driven without reasonable consideration for others if someone is inconvenienced. But the offence is committed if you drive without due care and attention, OR without reasonable consideration for other person. You have done the first if the driving falls below what would be expected of a careful and competent driver, regardless of whether anyone was inconvenienced. And CPS guidance specifically cites driving too close to another vehicle as an example.
Some years ago (before there was a cycle lane) I used to commute on Sidmouth St. But only because I worked on the London Road campus, from anywhere else there are better alternatives. As a cycle route it runs from between two busy roads, neither of which are exactly cycle friendly. So it's hardly surprising that no cyclists use it.
The officer's comments unfortunately reflect the reality of UK law. While the Highway Code guidance indeed refers to 1.5m, that is not anywhere in the law. And the criteria in law for proving a charge of careless driving does in fact rest on whether the rider is being "inconvenienced", as the discovered several years ago when the Met prosecuted a taxi driver who nearly hit me when cutting into my lane from the left near Marylebone. The prosecution lawyer was a barely competent newbie who fumbled over his words. The court computer was barely capable of playing the video footage, which kept freezing and crashing. The cabbie had an highly assertive defence lawyer who immediately seized on this point, and argued to the magistraite that I clearly hadn't been "inconvenienced" because I had not stopped or swerved, and had carried on my journey. Never mind that didn't have time to do either of those things, or that I was centimetres from being hit - the magistraite acquitted him on those grounds. That is unfortunately the outrageous reality of actually prosecuting a close pass incident. I know it's popular to blame the police and the CPS for not prosecuting enough close passes ... but the fact is the law is inadequate, and if the driver has a good lawyer then they can likely get off most close pass prosecutions.
Let's not forget the protruding "side" mirror...
HTML rules are clearly only partially implemented
please can we have the ability to use bold and italics for emphasis back as well?
As a Reading resident and cyclist, I can say I cannot think of a single occasion when I have seen a cyclist using the Sidmouth St cycle lane, nor can I think of any reason I'd use it myself. It doesn't connect to any other useful cycle routes. I don't rejoice that some of it is going back to motor traffic but I can see why the council is proposing to do that. Reading could really do with a cycleway to cross the town centre west to east and east to west but I'm not holding my breath on that.
Giant are one of the most trustworthy brands out there when it comes to manufacturing components given that they actually own their own production facilities. None of that matters though when it comes to road hookless, I and most other people won't touch it with a barge pole. We're surely at a stage now where it's toxic amongst consumers and it's only a matter of time before the UCI ban it for racing.
Filling the road with one person per car is using the road space more efficiently, amazing, I never realised that.
I bought a Giant Defy recently and immediately sold off the hookless wheels at a pretty big loss and won't ever do that again. I'm not buying hookless for road ever. Giant in particular has very short list of what tires they test with their rims so it's way too restrictive even if I was going to ride hookless wheels. Which I won't. Very short sighted by Giant.
50 thoughts on “Jeremy Vine says near miss was “closest I’ve come to dying on my bicycle”; Tour of Antalya calamity; Cav chalks up first victory of 2022; Why not walk or cycle? Because you ripped out the bike lane!; What’s a ‘carsplainer’? + more on the live blog”
We all know a particular kind
We all know a particular kind of motorist, the one who usually pops up in the Daily Mail comments section, trolling Road.cc or on talk radio to pontificate about how cyclists are always breaking red lights, riding 73-abreast, not paying road tax, and generally causing a menace on our roads and frightening defenceless, law-abiding car drivers.
FTFY.
Don’t forget T(i)Tsplaining
Don’t forget T(i)Tsplaining which is when an annoying, ignorant tit pontificates about the dangers of time trial bikes.
Mungecrundle wrote:
There’s also the trollsplainer that pontificates in stereotyped, often misogynistic and racist terms about cycling/cyclists and certain cities, whilst simulatneously thinking they are either a) somehow correct, b) somehow funny or c) somehow the victim of cyberbullying
Don’t forget their obsession
Don’t forget their obsession with any excess weight…
ktache wrote:
Unless that excess weight is choosing an oversized vehicle, in which case it’s fine and doesn’t damage roads as much as a bicycle would.
I think “carsplainer” is a
I think “carsplainer” is a perfectly good term, and one that adequately describes someone who drives but doesn’t ride a bike.
Of course, there are also cyclists who choose to ride rather than ever walk in pedestrianised zones. What should those people be dubbed? I vote for:
“Cyclesplaining”
When someone (typically white, middle class, rotund and male) rides a bike antisocially and dangerously, yet simultaneously thinks they are virtuous and environmentally conscious.
“Mike nearly ploughed in to Gladys, 90, at the shopping centre today, but instead of apologising he cyclesplained ‘get back to your resthome you old hag, I’m saving the planet!'”
There are some mushrooms
There are some mushrooms growing in my back garden. I think I’ll go and watch them for a bit
It posts like a trollsplainer
It posts like a trollsplainer
Garage at Large wrote:
I am currently on the fence over whether you are actually just here to get a response or are genuinely just a deeply unpleasant person who I am glad I don’t have to deal with in real life.
Jetmans Dad wrote:
False dichotomy there – I could be both.
Garage at Large wrote:
Y’know – that needs to be saved as a screenshot for posterity.
brooksby wrote:
He’s not the Messiah and he’s a very naughty boy.
I personally think he’s just
I personally think he’s just a ? end
I will rescue you from your
I will rescue you from your more accurate original being in the latest post across the site 😉
There We Are Then.
There We Are Then.
A couple of years ago, I was
A couple of years ago, I was knocked off my bike. I wasn’t wearing a helmet and I had a minor head injury (a cut that needed glueing, but no concussion). When I posted on Facebook about it, I got loads of comments that I should have been wearing a helmet.
Today, I saw on Facebook that a friend on mine was in a black cab which was involved in an RTA yesterday. He was flung forward and has some minor injuries as a result. Lots of sympathetic comments on facebook, and not a single person said he should have been wearing a seat belt.
You should have been wearing
You should have been wearing a helmet, the wisdom of crowds was correct.
People assume that if you’re in a car you’re wearing a seatbelt, as it is against the law not to wear one and has very high compliance – was it stated anywhere that your friend wasn’t wearing one?
Well done on missing the
Well done on missing the point. It was clear from his description of the incident that he was not wearing one.
The friend should have been
The friend should have been wearing a helmet. If it prevents only one . . .
Garage at Large wrote:
Wisdom of the crowds when woefuly overestimating the eficacy of cycle helmets.
groupthink – when no one agrees with the total bollocks you write here about just aout any subject.
Taxi drivers don’t have to
Taxi drivers don’t have to wear seat belts:
https://www.gov.uk/seat-belts-law/when-you-dont-need-to-wear-a-seat-belt
But their passengers do, and
But their passengers do, and the cabbie shares responsibility for ensuring they do.
Tom_77 wrote:
I did not know that. It seems like an odd exemption.
It also misses the point of Steve’s annocdote – whether or not there was a legal requirement to wear one, the point was that the driver chose not to wear it, received (presumably) more serious injuries as a result, and yet no-one felt it necessary or appropriate to comment on how the driver’s personal safety choices may or may not have contributed to the injuries.
OnYerBike wrote:
I think it actually proves the point of Steve’s annecdote precisely…. something our resident troll has completely missed.
If a cyclist is involved in an accident and they are not wearing a helmet, motorist friends and trolls will criticise the cyclist for not wearing a helmet which they are not required to do…. because it might have stopped an injury, emphasis on the word might.
Yet a motorist who is involved in an accident where they are not wearing a seabelt, even if they were not legally obliged to wear one, their motorist friends will not say “well if you had been wearing your seatbelt…..”
This despite evidence that a significant number of road deaths are down to drivers still failing to wear their seatbelt….. for example “Figures show 13 per cent of those killed on Scotland’s roads over the last five years were not wearing a seatbelt. Despite this, new research reveals that almost one in ten drivers always drive a car without wearing a seatbelt. A survey found that drivers think drink-driving, drug-driving, using a phone while driving, driving while fatigued and driving aggressively are all ‘riskier’ than not wearing a seatbelt while driving.”
TriTaxMan wrote:
They would probably be right then, as not wearing a seatbelt seems to increase chance of death in an collision by about a third (from your figures), while those other things will increase the chance of collision by more than a third, collisions which could affect not just the seatbelt user, but others around them.
wycombewheeler wrote:
Not exactly, because we don’t know how many of those dead were drivers and how many passengers. At a pure guess I would assume more passengers die in crashes as drivers tend to have more airbag protection, but that is just a guess.
Rendel Harris wrote:
The thing being it has been shown that without a seatbelt serious and fatal injuries can still occur, and can sometimes be made worse by the airbags.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YLCWGcNpY94 this video (at 2:35) shows the effects of a crash at 64 kmh with and without seatbelts…. and the results are shocking.
Rendel Harris wrote:
every car ina colission has a driver, but not all have passengers. I’d be surprised if more deaths were from passengers than drivers.
Also their reluctance to wear a seatbelt would be the same if the were a driver or a passenger. I wonder if car in crashes are more likely to be single ossupant, or multiple occupant.
OnYerBike wrote:
It comes from the days before screens became the norm, when the taxi trade complained that if drivers had to wear a seatbelt passengers could use it to pin them down and demand their money. It’s now an anachronism, given the prevalence of safety screens and the cashless society, but it’s never been changed.
Rendel Harris wrote:
They could still pin them down and demand a 5 star rating.
Rendel Harris wrote:
Or that or because the standard of driving is higher so they don’t need seat belts.
yeah, probably not the second one.
Tom_77 wrote:
a passenger in a trade vehicle and you’re investigating a fault
I wasn’t wearing a seatbelt as we were investigating a potential fault with the brakes
Steve K wrote:
Hadn’t thought of the seatbelt, I thought you were going to say statisically you are more likely to bang your head in a car (or your bath) than on a bike, so where was his car helmet?
Well, that too.
Well, that too.
But my point was we both had minor injuries, and both were blameless. Responses to him were all sympathetic; but to me they blamed me for lack of PPE. Yet he was the one who was required by law to have the PPE (he was a passenger, not the driver).
Steve K wrote:
I feel the response given to you can be summed up by the phrase….. “but cyclists…..”
The Vine vid is truly
The Vine vid is truly terrifying from the back, and I’m hoping that this driver has been reported for multiple offences.
eburtthebike wrote:
Are we sure that Vine didn’t deliberately antagonise that driver into doing that just so that he’d have something to post?
Yet another reason why I don
Yet another reason why I don’t run cameras.
On the road, you’d go ‘arsehole’ & forget about it.
But when you came home & put together the video to show how close you’d been to being hit, it’d bring it all back & you’d be reluctant to go out for a ride on that route again. Which would be a pain if it was your commute.
tarquin_foxglove wrote:
I get what you’re saying, but the other aspect is that without a camera, you could be unknowingly riding a route that has bad drivers/junctions etc.
It’s similar to arguing that if you don’t go to the doctor then you can continue living as you wish rather than e.g. taking blood pressure medication or changing your diet.
However, sometimes it’s better to not focus on the possible dangers – cycling is mainly a safe activity.
Knowing the area and looking
Knowing the area and looking at the timings on the video, at a back-of-an-envelope calculation I reckon s/he’s doing 41 mp/h in a 20 zone, add in the use of the bus lane to make an undertake and it should be a Band F, punishable by a fine of up to 7x weekly wage for starters. If they drive like that they’re unlikely to have a clean licence either, so hopefully the points will get them a ban too.
eburtthebike wrote:
The comments on his twitter feed are also terrifying – All these are from one person
Good see Cav back to winning
Good see Cav back to winning ways. However I think the ‘road to 35’ may have a rather significant obstruction – one that is Fabio Jackobsen shaped.
Nothing that a little
Nothing that a little training ‘accident’ knocking into Jakobsen’s handlebars couldn’t fix.
mdavidford wrote:
Given that this is Jakobsen who nearly died in a crash two years, this is in slightly poor taste, no?
vthejk wrote:
I had forgotten that that had happened to him. To be fair, though, I wasn’t implying anything worse than causing him a niggling knee problem. If I had been, then surely it would be in bad taste whoever the subject of it was?
mdavidford wrote:
No, I’m sure the actual intention behind that comment wasn’t malicious, but reading it and thinking “Hmm, Jakobsen? Make him crash, again? By pushing him by the handlebars?” It just Seemed a little extreme is all.
Fair enough – I can see how
Fair enough – I can see how it might have been misinterpreted to mean that.
Yesbutter: Those who
Yesbutter: Those who instantly cry ‘Yes, but…’ when faced with any argument against themselves or something they have done wrong.
eg: Person on a cycle: “You overtook me too close on this narrow road.”
Person in a car: “Yes, but a cyclist jumped a red light 5 years ago and I saw them; therefore, you deserved it.”
Feel free to mine this thread for some more excellent examples of the above.
On the one hand, the repeated
On the one hand, the repeated selection of French wildcards is understandable, but it is also holding the sport back. If you are a non-French (or Italian or Spanish) sponsor, do you really want to fund a team to ProConti level when you know you have virtually no chance of getting a wildcard at one of the grand tours, unless you manage to finish first in the rankings?
Cavs just posted some decent
Cavs just posted some decent footage of his stage 2 win. Stunning sprint – comes from nowhere.
https://twitter.com/markcavendish/status/1492566608442630146?s=21