Retired Scottish pro cyclist David Millar‘s upcoming appearance as a guest speaker at a sports festival, to speak about his journey and experiences, has received criticism online for “platforming a former doper”, forcing the organisers to release a statement clarifying that Millar will be open to answering “difficult and searching” questions about the ins and outs of the pro cycling world and that the former British champion is keen to “change opinions”.
The festival in question is the Keswick Mountain Festival (KMF), an annual festival held in May in Keswick, Cumbria, featuring a diverse category of sports like cycling, running, swimming, hiking, and more. Earlier this month, the festival announced through its social media that Millar would be joining the KMF as a speaker.
However, the response wasn’t one, perhaps, the organisers were hoping for, with many people on social media critical of the festival for giving the mic to Millar, who in 2004 initially admitted to doping on two occasions in 2001 and 2003, after he was found by French police to be in the possession of the performance-enhancing, blood boosting drug EPO and two used syringes.
? New Addition to the KMF Speaker Programme ?
Introducing David Millar…..?
David Millar has won stages of the Tour de France and La Vuelta a Espana before receiving a suspension for doping in 2004.
David will be speaking about his journey and experiences. Tickets on sale pic.twitter.com/l7FTO3SRLJ
— Keswick Mountain Festival (@KeswickFestival) March 12, 2024
Millar was subsequently suspended by British Cycling for two years and stripped of his world time trial championship along with his Tour de France and Vuelta a España stage wins, as well as receiving a lifetime ban from the British Olympic Association.
After returning to the sport as a reformed anti-doping activist, especially after joining the outspokenly ‘clean’ Garmin-Slipstream team in 2008, Millar revealed in his 2011 autobiography, Racing Through the Dark, that he had used EPO for two years between 2001 and 2003.
Following the backlash, KMF has shared another statement on its social media, responding to the criticisms. It wrote: “The announcement of David Millar as a speaker at KMF wasn’t met with universal approval. People didn’t think we should be platforming a former doper.
“David invites you to hear his story, an inside view into what really goes on in the world of professional cycling. He wants to confront these perceptions head on with a view to changing your opinion. And he’ll be taking your questions, no matter how difficult and searching they may be.
“So come and ask what you really want to know about.”
Despite this, backlash against KMF’s decision has still lingered on. Lee Wood commented on Facebook: “Will he explain why ‘I only doped once’ ultimately became ‘I doped lots’? The problem many people have with [Millar] is not that he doped, nor that he got caught, but that he made a post-ban career based on lies, hypocrisy and being incredibly sanctimonious.
“But he’s repeatedly given a platform and no one within cycling ever calls him out on the inconsistencies in his story.”
> National TT champ Alex Dowsett calls for drugs cheats to be banned for life
However, a number of people have also expressed their support for Millar. Ben Elliot wrote: “He put his head above the parapet and became part of the wave that ended the omerta (that destroyed [Paul] Kimmage and others) to an end. Cycling needed its catharsis to end the ways of its past. The days of aspiring riders believing it’s necessary to dope to win professionally or at the Olympics are gone.”
Matt Schofield also said on Twitter: “People should read his book before passing comment. Doping was rampant at the time and nearly destroyed the sport, but people like DM made a stand following a ban to lift the lid on it and save hundreds of new riders falling into the same trap! People should thank, not vilify!”
After his suspension period was over, Millar returned to the pro cycling scene and won the national road and time trial championships in 2007, as well as stacking his palmares with Giro d’Italia and Vuelta a España stage wins, wearing the KOM jersey at the Tour de France and winning a gold medal at the 2010 Commonwealth Games.
He retired in 2014 and since 2016 has been the co-commentator on ITV’s coverage of the Tour de France and Vuelta a España, as well as hosting a cycling-adjacent podcast Never Strays Far with fellow ITV commentator Ned Boulting and former pro Peter Kennaugh.
Last year in August, Millar had sparked up controversy after posting a video of his new SUV, the Ineos Grenadier 4×4, with the caption: “The INEOSGrenadier has landed. There’s a fine line between madness/genius and this car is owning it.”
The @INEOSGrenadier has landed ?? There’s a fine line between madness / genius and this car is owning it ?? pic.twitter.com/lJ4YC1F3Jm
— David Millar (@millarmind) August 9, 2023
Many fans and cycling campaigners slammed the post, with Prof Matt Hannon from the University of Strathclyde writing: “When cycling superstars like David promote SUVs, you know we have a very big cultural problem regarding status symbols & conspicuous consumption. One which, in my honest opinion, presents the single biggest threat to sustainability & net-zero, as we rely ever more on people to change their lifestyles.
“I’m particularly confused by this as David is such an important spokesperson for cycling. He’s an inspiration to so many, to take to two wheels and ditch four.
“I hope he can re-evaluate his values as they don’t seem compatible with one another. We need people like him onboard.”




















63 thoughts on “David Millar promises to “change your opinion” and reveal “what goes on in pro cycling world”, after critics slam sports festival for “platforming a former doper””
I find it much more offensive
I find it much more offensive that they are giving a platform to someone who has promoted the INEOS Grenadier than to someone who doped; doping was wrong and he’s been rightly punished for it, but it didn’t kill anyone or poison their environments.
I completely agree, it’s the
I completely agree, it’s the SUV that is unforgivable.
I presume the same people
I presume the same people moaning refuse to watch any ITV cycling coverage thesedays when he’s on.
he doped, was caught, paid the price, has a story to tell, dont see the problem.
I’m a bit conflicted, on one
I’m a bit conflicted, on one hand I want to say, he’s paid the price and move on, but has he drugs will have elevated his body to a higher level and the half life of muscles is massive, even after the ban he might have still been benefiting from being at that higher level pre ban :-/
I presume they also switch
I presume they also switch off when Linford Christie raises his head.
Actually, I still have some issues with Paula Radcliffe over those comments she made in defense of Mo Farah.
At least David Millar came clean about what he’d done.
I know people that vilify
I know people that vilify Millar for doping but were happy to cheer on that wheelsucking doper Valverde. Go figure.
And there are others as well.
And there are others as well…….Cycling has a strange bunch of ‘fans’……
I was very negative about him
I was very negative about him as a former doper. However, I have had the opportunity to meet him a couple of times and, although I found him a very complex character, found his story compelling and honestly told.
Millar’s OK. Never was a
Millar’s OK. Never was a found-out doper more contrite and ashamed than he. Yes, he could be a bit of a dick when he was younger, he was hugely naturally talented and he knew it. When he got caught he reassessed his life and came back with a lot more humility.
Yes, he doped, but he was never in the same league as the heavyweight dopers like Armstrong, who’s still a total dick to this day. And he wasn’t a bully either.
I’ve read his book, followed
I’ve read his book, followed him while he was racing … I’m not a fan … but I respect him for his putting his head above the parapet… and taking the consequences… without whinging …
He’s a good commentator and his past experience and acceptance of the damage he caused to both himself and the sport works for me …
As for the Grenadier … I’ll stick with my 2.2 ltr auto pickup truck for half the price …. To quote The Prodgiy ( Miss you Kieth ) .. ….. Diesel Power !!!
And … Boardman, clean …
And … Boardman, clean … Wiggins, clean … Shaun with the rattling pockets … clean …Delgado, clean …. everybody took something … sometime ….. deal with it …..
Everybody took something?
Everybody took something? Nicole Cooke didn’t.
Sean Kelly, assuming you mean
Sean Kelly, assuming you mean him by the rattling pockets, /did/ fail tests in his career.
Whoosh
Whoosh
is it such a dog-eat-dog
is it such a dog-eat-dog world that has infected the world of “The Rider”? There is purity in the suffering on two-wheels; but not with this guy (Millar)- bye, loser….
There’s nothing ‘cool’ in
There’s nothing ‘cool’ in suffering……and is an awful term to use.
‘Cool’ was your word, but an
‘Cool’ was your word, but an awful lot of the cycling world would disagree with you if you are saying that suffering is only bad.
Would he have continued
Would he have continued doping had he been able to get away with it? Of course
He admitted it too when questioned.
But how can he be an advocate for clean sport, HAVING BEEN a doper? Where is the credibility in that.
There is another British rider who can, was of the same era and was successful as a clean rider. His name is Chris Boardman. I have plenty of time for what he has to say.
For others who have mentioned it, I won’t listen to any commentary that involves him, I’d rather watch Eurosport Player. There are other ex- professionals who now commentate and add useful content without a background of cheating
Mike Murray wrote:
Having participated in workshops with kids at risk of joining gangs etc and ex-offenders, I can tell you for sure that nobody has more credibility than a former offender who’s seen the error of his ways and wants to use their experience to stop others making the same mistakes. Nobody. As for Chris B, yes a wonderful man and great clean rider, he doesn’t seem to have any problem working for the same ITV team as Millar. Perhaps he is prepared to believe in redemption and forgiveness rather than sanctimonious “no second chances” nonsense?
A second chance yes of course
A second chance yes of course, within the sport, no
Doing the work outside of the sport to teach others to avoid heading the wrong way in life is admiral. However still being a part of the sport leaves a bitter taste, in the same way that Riis and Vino were DS after they were found out. Where is the morality in known cheats having any part of a sport where riders that supersede them will always have suspicions about how clean they are when they win a race or more..
How would you feel had your offspring missed out on a podium, a medal, even a win at the hands of someone who didn’t play by the rules? The moment of pure joy as people celebrate a race winner has gone, the prizes, the chance to get a better contract at the end of the year, etc, even if the cheats are stripped of their titles as a result of subsequent investigations.
And how would you feel if you
And how would you feel if you were a talented, successful rider and suddenly found yourself struggling to keep up in races you should have been shining in? If you had the choice between doing what much of the rest of the peloton are doing and having the career you feel you deserve, or packing it all in, what would you do–bearing in mind you that you might have a family to provide for?
Mike Murray wrote:
Chris Boardman rode in an era when the peloton was absolutely full to the gills with doping. Doping with hormones was the norm, EPO, testosterone and corticosteroids (the latter de rigueur on French teams). Chris Boardman rode fro a French team. Chris Boardman had to retire from cycling because he had osteoporosis. He also had very low testosterone and he says he had to start taking T after cycling.
Osteoporosis is _rare_ in men, and *super* rare in healthy young men. However, it has been documented to occur as a side effect of… prolonged corticosteriod use, generally still only in middle-aged men or older. Prolonged use of exogenous testosterone is also known to suppress natural production of testosterone.
Chris Boardman is “clean”…
Paul J wrote:
A few facts you might like to take on board before accusing people of doping:
1. Osteoporosis is not rare in men, around 7% of men develop it during their lifetimes and 25% of men will develop osteopenia, the precursor of osteoporosis;
2. Excessive levels of exercise in elite sports people is recognised as a cause of hormonal deficiency which in turn leads to osteoporosis;
3. Boardman has a family history of osteoporosis, including his late mother who suffered from it, and there is a strong genetic component to the development of the condition.
If you’re going to make
If you’re going to make accusations you should do so explicitly and unequivocally. What you wrote makes you look cowardly and weak. It’s nasty.
Osteopenia rather common in
Osteopenia rather common in men and cyclists get it due to not doing weight bearing exercise and eating to stay light
Poor you. What a miserable
Poor you. What a miserable world you inhabit
Boardman was first and
Boardman was first and foremost a time trialling track rider. Not a great bunch rider. Pro peleton was a side show for him. He only went pro road quite late in career, already been successful, mature, was already married with children, never moved to France but went home to his family base on Merseyside. Nothing comparable with almost the entire peleton of that era of young men with not much else going for them and at whim of team managers and DS who were themselves doers in axeorld of omerta
I remember him having
I remember him having problems at the start of his pro career because he was so scared of riding in a bug bunch, especially on fast descents.
It’s not only taking drugs
It’s not only taking drugs that damages the sport and the rider .. it’s the side effects. … Look at Robert Millar ….. he turned into Pippa … !!!
Better to keep your mouth
Better to keep your mouth shut and people think you’re a prick than to open it so that people know you’re a prick
Dude, too agressive. Road.cc
Dude, too agressive. Road.cc should have you banned. I agree Miller was a cheat and bad for our sport and should be pushed to the back of the stage, not the front. He has nothing to offer that is positive for our sports’s future.
Tom Simpson is hailed as a
Tom Simpson is hailed as a hero, yet he took drugs.
Is it dependent on where you come from whether you are a drugs cheat or not?
My comment was not directed
My comment was not directed at David Millar – it was a response to Trooper74’s transphobic “joke” about Pippa York.
I thought your comment was
I thought your comment was obvious in its meaning. Poster you replied to has history in this site.
I am new to road.cc – is
I am new to road.cc – is there no moderation of comments? I can’t see how this would be acceptable here. More what you would expect from some golf club bore or BTL on the Daily Mail
papapasco wrote:
Not much but if you email info@road.cc they will look at any complaint.
Thanks – done that
Thanks – done that
There is little moderation.
There is little moderation.
Anti semitism and racism are the main things that result in a post removed. It’s all retro active if you use the address highlighted by Rendel.
There’s a few Daily Mail
There’s a few Daily Mail readers on here and a couple of out and out dickheads.
don simon fbpe wrote:
…but you repeat yourself
Some are simply not aware of
Some are simply not aware of their brains having been washed and need a little education (or a slap), the dickheads know exactly what they’re doing.
Not all dickheads read the DM
Not all dickheads read the DM. Other bog paper is available, Express is worse
I’ve met Pippa … had the
I’ve met Pippa … had the greatest, greatest respect for her former persona … and … who she is now .. what makes Pippa so special is …. unlike you .. her sense of humour … Free speech not one of your strong points .. ?
Like so many others … …
Forums should be about information and discussion …. but discussion is the enemy of so many …
Nothing wrong with my sense
Nothing wrong with my sense of humour, I just don’t think that using the fact that someone is trans as an excuse for a cheap & fatuous “laugh” is particularly funny. If you had respect for Pippa, or trans people in general, you would know that “dead naming” someone can be extremely offensive. Open your mind, Trooper74, and you would realise that trans people are amongst the most marginalised, discriminated against and vulnerable people in our society, thanks in part to right wing politicians’ persistent attempts to demonise them. You chose to make your “joke” below an article about a completely different ex pro cyclist and an issue that has nothing to do with being trans. This is not “free speech”, just your self-indulgent bigotry, masquerading as “bantz”
Thank god I didn’t get your
Thank god I didn’t get your pronoun wrong … one of my children is Trans , transitioned 6 years ago … never marginalised, never discriminated against, certainly not vulnerable …. … some people wake every morning determined to be offended … Others choose life…
Some choose bullshit and lies
Some choose bullshit and lies, also.
“never marginalised, never
“never marginalised, never discriminated against”
Of course.
Hirsute wrote:
I have dozens of black friends and not one of them has ever experienced racism, it’s just made up by people who “wake up every morning determined to be offended”.
And yet YOU choose to make a
And yet YOU choose to make a “joke” at the expense of a trans person, apropos of nothing at all. Just ask yourself whether a trans, gay or non-binary person reading your original comment would think that this is a forum where they can feel comfortable about who they are.
Stop digging
Stop digging
Nasty little piece of work,
Nasty little piece of work, aren’t you?
You certainly seem to be
You certainly seem to be enjoying yourself anyway. Don’t want to spoil your fun, but have you heard the saying “Let him who is without sin cast the first stone”?
What’s that old saying about
What’s that old saying about a foolish consistency being the hobgoblin of small minds?
I’m reminded of it every time people wheel out their high-horses to proclaim against ex-dopers.
Apart from the fact that I really enjoy his commentary and found his book a good read, I also wonder if cycling as a professional dport is slightly better off for D.M. having doped and then come out about it later OR would cycling be better off for him having not doped at all and having been that little bit more anonymous to begin with.
Sure, morally he made the wrong decision, potentially depriving clean athletes of a chance at success, but perhaps he has atoned for that?
Cycling has the most
Cycling has the most ridiculous sets of fans I know of……
He doped, was caught, and has spoken about it, and has campaigned for clean sport. I don’t know what the problem is?
Footballers dive, cricketers use sandpaper, cheating happens in all sports……
The critics should get back in the box they crawled out of……
A few nobodies who represent
A few nobodies who represent no one but themselves. They’re not worth worrying about. Before the advent of “social media”, they would have gone unnoticed.
He was only interested in
He was only interested in campaigning against doping after he got caught. He didn’t give it up voluntarily.
Now his company bost about their supposed eco-credentials while he advertises the world’s most pointless SUV.
The man’s a massive hypocrite and needs to be called out for it.
According to his
According to his autobiography he did give it up voluntarily. He was caught when French police found two old syringes in his house, at which point he was no longer using. Of course that might not be true but you have no evidence to the contrary, and if he was still using why didn’t the same search turn up clean syringes and needles and fresh vials of epo?
I agree with Matt Hannon,
I agree with Matt Hannon, promoting mindless consumption is a much bigger issue than seeking career advantage.
I don’t have a problem with
I don’t have a problem with him telling his story but platforming a doper is bollocks. Even if I did, the new Governement rule of accepting apologies and heartfelt contrition applies…….. but he doesn’t have to slip me £15m in donations…. unless he really wants to.
Want to try that again in
Want to try that again in English ……….?
TROOPER74 wrote:
There could maybe be a “but” between “story” and “platforming”, apart from that the post makes perfect sense. If you don’t understand it it’s your reading comprehension rather than their English that’s a problem.
Flag wavers, what can you do!
Flag wavers, what can you do!
Ah, welcome to the cognotive
Ah, welcome to the cognotive dissonance of ‘true cycling fans’, for whom the purity of the sport is all, the Velominati isn’t satire, and doping is basically okay as long as you fall on sword when caught and never talk about it.
Millar was a bit of dick when pro, and anecdotally can still be a bit of a dick these days – however, the personality type required to get to the top flight of any professional sport does lend itself to being a bit of dick.
Indeed, that seems to be the underlying problem for those that dislike him – since retiring Millar has been quite a bit of a dick to the percieved sanctity and purity of the sport by rightly pointing out that doping wasn’t, isn’t, an individual rider’s choice – it takes a quite a large team of people to put PEDs into a pro rider’s blood.
That the sport was systemically rotten is not a message the puritanical want to hear, not least because it raises the very awkward question of whether the sport is clean right now.
Far better for the bogeymen such as Millar, Armstong, and others to quietly STFU so the purtians can go back to hero worshipping the martyrdom of Pantani and Simpson.