Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Segregated bike lane sends delivery drivers “straight towards cyclists”

“It’s more dangerous than not having the barriers there,” said one commuter of the cycle lane, which provides access for a delivery bay

A segregated cycle lane in Manchester which provides access for delivery drivers – purportedly resulting in motorists driving head-on towards cyclists – has been slammed as “dangerous” and branded “messed up” by a commuter.

The protected bike lane on Deansgate in Manchester’s city centre was installed as part of temporary measures introduced during the initial stages of the Covid-19 pandemic. Those changes were made permanent over the summer, with new taller, fixed bollards added to protect cyclists from other traffic as part of Manchester City Council’s Streets For All scheme, which aims to increase walking and cycling routes in the city.

However, Dominic Parry, a 3D construction modeller from Prestwich who uses the Deansgate bike lane on his commute to work, told the Manchester Evening News that the council was “installing unsafe infrastructure”.

According to the 47-year-old, as the bike lane also provides access to a delivery bay and is only wide enough for vans in places, cyclists using it have been left with “nowhere to go”.

> “We’re being taken for fools”: Manchester Bee Network blasted as motorists filmed driving into cycle zone 

“It’s dangerous, it’s more dangerous than not having the barriers there,” he said. “There could be a van parked in the delivery bay that tries to set off and it’s coming straight towards you. It seems to me that’s what’s been designed in.

“There is a dotted entrance and exit for the lane. At one point it’s as narrow as a cycle lane so if someone is parked there, where do you go?”

Manchester City Council confirmed to the newspaper that the delivery bay, which is available for loading between 6am and 10.30am according to the active travel plans, can be accessed by the cycle lane, a situation Parry described as “messed up”.

However, the council has defended the cycle lane’s layout, pointing out that a camera is set to be installed to enforce the delivery bay’s restricted loading times and to “ensure that the safety of cyclists is maximised”.

“The implementation of the revised cycling infrastructure went through a robust design process and was taken to statutory consultation where the public were able to feedback on the scheme,” a council spokesperson said.

“A Road Safety Audit was also carried out with no adverse comments received in opposition of the road’s revised layout.

“Loading is currently restricted to 6.00-10.30am, a restriction which will shortly be enforced through the use of a camera to ensure that the safety of cyclists is maximised.”

After obtaining a PhD, lecturing, and hosting a history podcast at Queen’s University Belfast, Ryan joined road.cc in December 2021 and since then has kept the site’s readers and listeners informed and enthralled (well at least occasionally) on news, the live blog, and the road.cc Podcast. After boarding a wrong bus at the world championships and ruining a good pair of jeans at the cyclocross, he now serves as road.cc’s senior news writer. Before his foray into cycling journalism, he wallowed in the equally pitiless world of academia, where he wrote a book about Victorian politics and droned on about cycling and bikes to classes of bored students (while taking every chance he could get to talk about cycling in print or on the radio). He can be found riding his bike very slowly around the narrow, scenic country lanes of Co. Down.

Add new comment

11 comments

Avatar
Safety | 2 years ago
4 likes

”the council has defended the cycle lane’s layout, pointing out that a camera is set to be installed to enforce the delivery bay’s restricted loading times"
How on earth will this make it safer? Perhaps may assist a post accident conviction. That'll be a great conseletion to a grieving family.
Even if it will make it safer surely it's an admission it's not safe now. And how do they not have working from day one? Imagine selling a car and saying bring it back sometime and we'll fit the seatbelt and airbags.
Rant over, sorry.

Avatar
HarrogateSpa | 2 years ago
7 likes

It sounds as though the problem is the loading bay, not the wands.

I find it frustrating that whenever motor vehicles cause danger, the instant reaction from some people is 'take out the cycle infrastructure'.

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to HarrogateSpa | 2 years ago
5 likes

Yup - things can only be installed where it doesn't inconvenience motorists.  Even if that's "cause problems when a motorist did something illegal / they weren't supposed to do"  - like driving in a cycle lane.

I think there has been a change in some places - cycle infra isn't seen as a complete waste of money and some councils are making it less badly.  But still not at the expense of the drivers... (Which in the UK will need to be the case.  We've gone so far down the route of making all available space driveable we have to take some away from motorists - there's often no other space).

Avatar
wtjs replied to chrisonabike | 2 years ago
5 likes

Yup - things can only be installed where it doesn't inconvenience motorists

You abject villain! You failed to write hard-working motorists

Avatar
zeeridesbikes | 2 years ago
1 like

State of the road surface is pretty shocking too. 

Avatar
ktache | 2 years ago
7 likes

So it will just be unsafe in the mornings then?

Avatar
Beryl replied to ktache | 2 years ago
10 likes

Employers will be cool with people starting their cycle commute after 10:30 in order to arrive at work in one piece, I'm sure

Avatar
jpj84 | 2 years ago
4 likes

In a proper country, a city centre shopping street like Deansgate would have been closed to traffic decades ago. Why is the English speaking world so bad at this?

Avatar
Older and sadder replied to jpj84 | 2 years ago
0 likes

Is that closed to all traffic or just the evil motor vehicles? I'm all in favour of pedesrian zones as I have been clipped three times by cyclist ignoiring pedestrian only signs and zooming through our local shopping centre. 

Avatar
AidanR | 2 years ago
5 likes

What is the point of a road safety audit if it doesn't pick up stupid, dangerous road design?

And restricting loading to most of the morning, including rush hour, is not the answer.

Avatar
Flintshire Boy | 2 years ago
0 likes

.

But, but, but - cannot be. It's a Lay Bah Council. A LAYYYY Bah Council.

.

This report must be wrong.

.

Latest Comments