Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

“We want to put women's cycling in the position it deserves”

UCI vice-president Tracey Gaudry talks about the need to improve women’s cycling from youth cycling up

The first-ever female UCI vice-president Tracey Gaudry, has established her intention to “put women’s cycling in the position it deserves”, six weeks after being appointed.

In an interview posted on the UCI website, Mrs Gaudry outlined her plans to improve the state of women’s cycling at every level with the help of her Women’s Cycling Committee (WCC) which she aims to have set up by the end of the year.

“In order to develop women’s cycling it needs, among other things, better visibility,” Mrs Gaudry said. “The rise of women’s cycling must involve everybody.”

Involving everybody, according to the UCI vice-president, starts with improving the environment for young cyclists. Mrs Gaudry believes that her WCC's vision must draw on the experiences of initiatives like the World Cycling Centre's programme for women coaches to address the gender imbalance within cycling which she suggests is a "dissuasive" factor for young women looking to get into the sport.

“For a young woman wanting to get into a cycling career, a male dominated environment can appear for some, let’s say, ‘dissuasive’. This stumbling block can be overcome if women are part of the entourage: coaches, doctors, mechanics etc.

“The [World Cycling Centre] programme for women coaches encourages [a] sharing of knowledge. It also helps to provide women cyclists with career pathways beyond their career as an athlete. This type of initiative, which helps structure the environment of women’s cycling, will help us establish the vision that our sport needs in order to look to the future with confidence.”

And the UCI have shown that they are looking forward with confidence in women’s cycling. Mrs Gaudry highlighted the UCI's decision to appoint a woman in each of their commissions as a huge showing of support, as well as president Brian Cookson’s abolishment of the age cap, which prevented teams from breaching an average age of 28 within their competitive squads.

“I was a cyclist and I know from experience that you can still achieve great things over a wide age range. Marianne Vos, who is a member of the Athletes’ Commission, proposed that this regulation made no sense. It is a simple proposal that received unanimous support.”

The UCI are not only looking to improve the state of women’s cycling for the younger and older riders, they are also targeting the UCI Women’s Road World Cup for improvements in competitive cycling. New classifications for the best young rider, sprinter and climber will be introduced to the competition in 2014.

“It is a decision that will motivate the riders as well as the organisers, sponsors, broadcasters and public.” Mrs Gaudry said. “It will provide multiple competitions within a competition like in a stage race. The calendar will be more exciting for everyone.

“We will have 8 World Cup rounds that will provide opportunities throughout the season for many styles of rider.

"I’m only sorry that I don’t race anymore.”

Add new comment

37 comments

Avatar
JonD replied to massspike | 10 years ago
0 likes
massspike wrote:

It's a competitive sport (aka meritocracy) so fund Women's cycling at the same level as Junior Men -- their equals.

That's bloody moronic comparison.

I shouldn't *have* to point this out but clearly in your case it's necessary.
It's a huge catch-22. Women's sport generally - and road racing in particular - doesn't get much coverage. Sponsors want media coverage, therefore aren't gonna put money into the sport without it. Without money, it's hard to form/maintain teams from year to year, and equally the women that want to race - and have the ability - can't afford to race at that level as a career. Everyone needs to pay the bills at the end of the month.

Track cycling's been far more evenly treated, and it shows.

You're not going to improve the state of women's professional cycling - which will have a knock-on-effect further down the scale - by sticking yer head in a bucket.

You only have to look at the effect of the 1921 ban on women's football in FA grounds to see how far it put the sport back.

And FWIW, the 2012 Olympic women's road race was one of the best bits of racing I've ever seen on tv.

Avatar
GoingRoundInCycles replied to massspike | 10 years ago
0 likes
massspike wrote:

It's a competitive sport (aka meritocracy) so fund Women's cycling at the same level as Junior Men -- their equals.

The only reason why we men cycle faster than women is because our bodies naturally produce more testosterone.

That isn't an 'achievement' that justifies extra funding IMO.

Avatar
Joeinpoole replied to GoingRoundInCycles | 10 years ago
0 likes
GoingRoundInCycles wrote:
massspike wrote:

It's a competitive sport (aka meritocracy) so fund Women's cycling at the same level as Junior Men -- their equals.

The only reason why we men cycle faster than women is because our bodies naturally produce more testosterone.

That isn't an 'achievement' that justifies extra funding IMO.

You're missing the point. Men's cycling doesn't need "extra funding" because it actually generates a massive surplus ... which goes to support junior and female cycling ... which don't generate a surplus. Far from it.

The money generated (and therefore the funding made available) is not determined by testosterone levels but by the commercial success of the hard-nosed business enterprises involved.

I appreciate you wanting to be ever so 'politically correct' in your musings but it isn't commercial reality, which is what actually counts.

If women spent anything like as much as men on their sport, in equipment, in tv subscriptions and in supporting their events ... then they would generate a similar income. But they don't and therefore the earnings potential of their elite athletes is correspondingly less.

Don't blame men for the lack of commercial success of women's sport. It's women themselves that aren't providing for their sisters with their support and their cash in their involvement with their sport.

Avatar
velobetty replied to massspike | 10 years ago
0 likes
massspike wrote:

It's a competitive sport (aka meritocracy) so fund Women's cycling at the same level as Junior Men -- their equals.

Well done. You've absolutely nailed the sexism that's inherent in cycling.

Avatar
VeloPeo | 10 years ago
0 likes

Yup - there's some great things being done in Women's cycling on shoestring budgets already. Needs to push on - it's entertaining racing

Avatar
Ush | 10 years ago
0 likes

I really hope this takes off. The difference between the way male and female athletes are treated is shocking.

Avatar
Stim | 10 years ago
0 likes

/

Pages

Latest Comments