Like this site? Help us to make it better.


Not approved! UCI forced to suspend controversial frame sticker programme

…but it hasn't gone away new programme to be announced on Feb 1...

Last week the UCI met cycling industry representatives to discuss its controversial "Approved by the UCI"  frame stickering programme now details of that meeting are emerging and it would seem that such was the level of industry discontent the UCI has been forced to think again and to temporarily suspend the programme.

In a letter written today (full text below) and then posted by its recipient on the forum of the industry website BikeBiz, Julien Carron - the UCI's technological co-ordinar (yes they really do co-ordinate things at the UCI) says that:

"Given the pertinence of the questions, remarks and propositions that came up and following on from the mail we have received since, the UCI has decided to modify certain points of the procedure.

… As a consequence, the procedure in its current form is suspended until 1st February. From this date, a revised version will come into force. "

Monsieur Carron goes on to say that the changes that the UCI will make "In no way questions "the foundations and the objectives of the approval procedure". We will all get to make own judgements on that when the UCI re-presents its approval programme to bicycle industry on the 1st of Feb. More pertinently for the UCI they will have to persuade the industry and the wider cycling public that their proposals do not represent a tax on innovation and smaller cycling companies.

It would seem that the UCI massively mid-judged industry reaction to their proposals possibly calculating that the big players would support, or at least not oppose the frame approval programme. Some observers feared this might be the case with the major bike companies able to absorb the costs of the programme and perhaps viewing the "UCI Approved" frame stickers as a marketing tool the fact that the frame approval programme would hurt smaller companies was also cited as a reason why the big players might back it. However, this does not seem to be the way things went, and certainly has not spoken to anyone from a bike company big or small that has had a good word to say for the UCI's programme - quite a few choice words though. 

The UCI's secretive and arbitrary approach in devising the now suspended programme will not have made it any friends, nor the tight deadline it imposed on companies in the run up to Christmas to get initial drawings to it for the start of the approval process. It may well be that all this combined with the looming prospect of more "approval" procedures for components and even clothing meant the big companies thought it better to hang together now for fear of hanging separately in the future - certainly none would relish the prospect of the UCI tail wagging the bike industry dog. It is also worth noting that the big four: Giant, Trek, Specialized, and Cannondale are all relatively new companies and what it's like to be a small company is well within the management memory of all of them.

It will be very interesting to see what proposals the UCI comes back with, at the very least we would expect them to propose some sort of sliding scale of fees to level the playing field for manufacturers. That is unlikely to be enough to appease their critics because so much of what lies behind the frame approval process and in particular the "clarified" rules on prototypes and testing runs contrary to the benefits the bike companies get from being involved with pro-race teams. Given the level of opposition that their proposals have so far received and how badly misjudged the implementation process has been  it is by no means a certainty the the industry will approve the new approval system either, this may be the first of very many visits back to the drawing board for the UCI. 

That UCI letter in full…

Aigle, 20 January 2011

Modification of the approval procedure

Dear Sirs / Madams,

The meeting organised with bicycle manufacturers at the International Cycling Union headquarters on January 13th and 14th concerning the approval procedure for bike frames and forks, in which a large number of you participated, led to some very constructive discussions and we would like to thank you for this.

Given the pertinence of the questions, remarks and propositions that came up and following on from the mail we have received since, the UCI has decided to modify certain points of the procedure.

We will contact you again before the end of next week in order to inform you of a procedure that has been adjusted to take your contributions into account. As a consequence, the procedure in its current form is suspended until 1st February. From this date, a revised version will come into force. 

We are confident that this process, which in no way questions the foundations and the objectives of the approval procedure, will benefit all concerned. We will endeavour to carry out the necessary modifications as quickly as possible.
Thank you for your understanding.

Best regards.

Julien CarronTechnological Coordinator's founder and first editor, nowadays to be found riding a spreadsheet. Tony's journey in cycling media started in 1997 as production editor and then deputy editor of Total Bike, acting editor of Total Mountain Bike and then seven years as editor of Cycling Plus. He launched his first cycling website - the Cycling Plus Forum at the turn of the century. In 2006 he left C+ to head up the launch team for Bike Radar which he edited until 2008, when he co-launched the multi-award winning - finally handing on the reins in 2021 to Jack Sexty. His favourite ride is his ‘commute’ - which he does most days inc weekends and he’s been cycle-commuting since 1994. His favourite bikes are titanium and have disc brakes, though he'd like to own a carbon bike one day.

Add new comment


BikerBob | 122 posts | 12 years ago

UCI.....still a bunch of t*ssers  4

bikeandy61 | 556 posts | 12 years ago

I personally would like to see every national federation, every registered cycle team of all disciplines and event/race owners all quit the UCI and carry on without them. Total and utter waste of time and space. They almost make national Governments look competent.

Shame it will never happen but I think something like this could only be good for cycling of levels and formats.

bikecellar | 267 posts | 12 years ago

The UCI needs to be kept in it's place and out of the cycle industry, their empire building ambitions have become a joke constantly trying to impose their unwanted ideas on all and sundry.

Latest Comments