An uncannily on-point story for this Black Friday — the only thing is that this discount isn’t born out of a place of corporate greed or any capitalist shenanigans.
Ricky Feather, the craftsman behind Feather Cycles from York known for making custom frames and winner of Bespoked Bristol, has shared the story of how he was duped for the third time this year by a customer who failed to pay for the frame, after all the fabrication was completed.
Despite having a pre-fab payment system in place, Ricky thought he would start building the frame as it was for someone he knew, giving them the benefit of the doubt. His goodwill didn’t pay much dividends unfortunately, as it marked the third time he was left “completely stuffed” this year.
> Meet the Maker: Ricky Feather video
“This frame is a perfect example of why around two years ago I was forced into a corner to not start any work without full payment for fabrication,” he wrote on social media. “It was a decision I didn’t take lightly as I really feared it would affect business.”
“The decision came after I was left broke, three Christmases in a row due to customers not paying invoices on completion of their frame.
“Luckily, my customers have been really understanding of the situation. Without cash flow, it’s impossible for small businesses to exist.
“Over the last 15 years, I have overcome a lot of hurdles and have had to make changes accordingly. It’s been tough, but I’m super stubborn and don’t let anything stop me. After all, I have no degree or qualifications to fall back on, no money sat in a pot, this is it for me. For nearly three-quarters of my working life, all I have known is Feather Cycles. I work way too much. It affects me both physically and mentally, it affects family life, even on holidays I don’t relax. It’s the first thing I think about in a morning and the last thing I think about at night.
“For the third time this year, I have been completely stuffed by a customer. I started this frame without the fab fee being paid, I gave it the benefit of the doubt as it was for someone I know and thought he was good for it.
“I want to use this as an opportunity to point out how important it is for independent businesses to be paid when invoices are raised. I don’t care if it’s me or the local seamstress, I’m speaking for all of us. I’m talking for everyone who builds bikes, it’s an incredibly hard business to sustain no matter how talented or resilient you are.”
> No discounts! Bike shops boycott Black Friday as majority of independent bike shops 'believe event negatively impacts their businesses'
Feather Cycles is now selling the frame at a massive discount, if anyone would like to purchase it and have the remaining work on it be finished by early spring. Ricky wrote: “It would normally retail for £4260 plus paint. £2500 plus paint and it’s yours.
He added: “It has tons of extras, including integrated headset, carbon ISP, T47,integrated flat mount bosses, hooded dropouts and custom stealth Di2 routed rear dropout. I can make an ISP topper tailored to your position on the bike, 0-25mm setback. It is designed around the new Columbus integrated cockpit (not included in the price).”
Several cyclists commented on Ricky’s post, offering him consolation. One person wrote: “There are some real tossers around but thought the cycling fraternity were ok. How wrong I am. Hope it works out on this frame for you. It’s s*** that you have to go through this. Your work is just the best and worth every penny,” while another added: “It's s*** you can't trust anybody to do the right thing.”
Here’s the dimensions for the frame if anyone’s interested in a little Christmas N+1 gift for themselves (or someone beloved). According to Ricky, the frame should be good for 5’8” - 5’10”-ish…
Add new comment
23 comments
So it seems it's now Heidi Alexander.
Not sure how this will change things, but a) she's been a Shadow Secretary of State for Health b) has had transport experience in London c) there's this thread on the Platform Formerly Known As Twitter from 4 years back (which I therefore can't read all of). I hope it ended well...
NSL, blind bend. 4 seconds later 2 vans came the other way !
My only hope is when the inevitable happnes that the one coming towards me ends up in the ditch and not spinning towards me.
Honestly, someone performs a perfect pass and you still complain...
(Also the folks doing the road markings could usefully have made that line "no overtaking" from that point or before. But then you probably would have simply had a closer pass...)
"Pro cyclists and their love for cars… Never fails to baffle me".
Uhm, same reason the top pros are wearing ridiculously expensive watches while racing. Cause they're getting paid to. Lamborghini - and the specific Belgian dealer - are getting wads of free publicity in the Belgian press (and further afield) thanks to Matthieu. Who hasn't seen the photos of Matthieu rocking up to muddy cyclocross races in the Lambo and pulling his Canyon out the back? PR gold in cycling mad Belgium, where Pro cyclists are front-page news. BMW will get the same from Evenepoel.
They're not /buying/ these cars, you know that right?
Note that, AFAIK, it's really only Belgium where pros are being gifted the use of very expensive cars (+ whatever other money comes as part of what is effectively a sponsorship deal).
Well arguably Cav is no longer a pro rider, but I do believe he has been given a nice Aston Martin.
I know Skoda often lend cars to pro riders of all ranks, ie not just big name riders for column inches in media, too
So, the transport secretary, Louise Haigh, has resigned.
Not because of policy differences but lying to police over a stolen work mobile in 2013.
Fkn politicians, all the same...
a "mistake" that happened in 2013, investigated and charged at the time, pleaded guiilty, given a caution (lowest sentence a magistrate can give I believe) declared to autorities as required, "forced to resign" because someone in the media decides to make a thing of it.
This minor infraction has been in the public domain since before she was elected (if they had cared to look) and the elecotrate have been happy to vote her in several times over.
Feels like she's been properly done over.
As a Labour supporter, or at least a socialist (not necessarily the same thing these days of course), it gives me no pleasure to see a member of the cabinet getting into trouble, but I'm not sure committing fraud by false representation is really a minor infraction and the circumstances as reported do look extremely dodgy, including not reporting having "found" the allegedly stolen phone to her employers, refusing to answer any questions at police interview and pleading guilty in court. If her story is true why didn't she just tell the police about it at interview and clear it all up then and there? There's also the question of the fact that her employers apparently/allegedly were investigating her for several other instances where she claimed her phone had been lost/stolen and asked for a replacement (something her representatives have not denied when asked to do so). It doesn't add up to a very pretty picture and the fact that Starmer was prepared to accept her as a minister originally but is now happy to accept her resignation implies there may be more to the case (which already looks pretty dubious, frankly) than is currently known.
I understand your point; however the punsihment for the offence proves it was a minor infraction, the lowest possible punishment does not inidcate there is more to this than that declared. However because the previous administration was so corrupted by self interest and resignations that were justified, by convention, did not happen, if the new Government is to reset standards, she had to go, even though the "controversy" is media manufactured.
I don't think anyone who has even a passing acquaintance with the sentences handed down to drivers as reported in these pages can have any doubt that it is possible for there to be significant discrepancies between the seriousness of an offence and the sentence handed out by a magistrate. Look at it in another way, if she was convicted of injuring somebody when drink-driving but given the lowest possible sentence for that offence, would we say that proves it was a minor infraction? It's the offence itself that is the important question rather than the punishment received.
If she is guilty of the offence, and she pleaded guilty, then she is guilty of lying to the police and her employers about an event in order to obtain a gain for herself (for fraud to exist in law there has to be an attempted gain to the fraudster or a loss for another party), and that's quite serious. I'm afraid I have to revert to the fact that she refused to answer questions about the matter from the police and pleaded guilty in court, why would you do that if you've done nothing wrong?
I did read her solicitor advised he not to answer.
"My solicitor advised me not to comment during that interview and I regret following that advice,"
The problem is that we're just hearing her side of that discussion (it certainly wouldn't be appropriate for her solicitor to comment on it) and there was likely very good reasons for her to not comment during an interview. I'd guess that her comments could then be proved false in a court of law and lead to a worse outcome than simply pleading guilty.
The Sun has an article today: "Keir knowingly let convicted criminal into heart of government while preaching about ethics - he has questions to answer"
Pretty sure they weren't so concerned about 'ethics' under the last how many Tory prime ministers…
Very different actually; reading the detail, this is a minor offence, previously declared, but the Minister has resigned. Compare and contrast this to the number of times Ministers breached the ministerial code without resigning, and the number of MPs accused of in inappropriate behaviour, that still retained the support of the various Prime Ministers over the last 10 years and you will be forced to agree that this is a step to restore standards and integrity.
Crap - she was shaping up to be the least-bad transport secretary for quite some time!
She talked alot about stuff, but not much in the way of action after nearly 6months was there?
So the bill to bring the railways back into public ownership is nothing to do with her then?
Slagging off P&O probably didn't help. Seems like a lot of fuss over what was probably a genuine mistake that happened over 10 years ago.
It is very very disappointing, because she was shaping up to be the best Transport Secretary in a long time.
I bet they're not getting a Xmas card this year…
Will be a lovely frame for the right person, it's very enjoyable getting to select paint colours. Too small for me!
It's perfect size for me - if my "friends" in the road.cc comments section fancy having a whip round in recognition of all the "entertainment" I give them through the year I would accept graciously!