Specialized Bicycle Components is being sued for $10 million by a Colorado man who claims that his cycle helmet failed to protect him when he came off his bike, sustaining serious head injuries.
Victor Moreno, aged 50, was left with a permanent brain injury when he crashed while cornering and also sustained a fractured skull and lacerated scalp, reports Bicycle Retailer and Industry News (BRAIN).
The Denver resident was wearing a Specialized Max helmet, sized XXL, which he had bought from Wheat Ridge Cyclery the previous year. The range is specifically aimed at cyclists with larger heads.
He is being represented by personal injury lawyers Dormer Harpring, with his complaint, filed in June, stating: "Mr Moreno bought the helmet because it was one of the few designed to fit his head and because he trusted that it would keep him safe during typical bicycle accident scenarios.
The complaint states that the helmet was sold to Mr Moreno with the undertaking that it complied with relevant safety standards as well as what Specialized is claimed to have said were its “more rigid criteria.”
The lawsuit also alleges that the helmet “was not designed and manufactured such that it could comply with the requirements of its certifications and testing” – BRAIN notes that it does not go into detail about how it is claimed not to have met them – and that Specialized’s testing and manufacturing decisions “resulted in the helmet being cheap instead of reasonably safe during common bicycle accidents.”
It alleges that one of the decisions was that of not using Multidirectional Impact Protection System (MIPS) technology, which seeks to counteract rotational forces and thereby try and prevent brain injuries, on the model of the helmet purchased by Mr Moreno.
> All you need to know about MIPS
Specialized filed a response last month denying the allegations.
Earlier this week, the US District Court in Denver rejected an application by both parties to prevent confidential trade information disclosed during the process from being made public.
I use unconventional mixtures of road and MTB equipment on my road bikes because the big brand groupsets don't recognise that avoiding traffic...
Since it's still a BSO, I don't the slightly compressed version being accepted as luggage.
Don't be daft, I'm not getting the mankini out until the mercury hits 17℃
As it's a parallel crossing, the driver does of course have exactly the same obligation. Though I think perhaps you are being ironic. HWC195.
I won a set of the Aces in a BC competition a few years ago (before I moved to Cycling UK). Used them a couple of times before giving up for above...
Yes I missed the daylight saving. Hope I didn't advantage anyone. Had to disappear well before race start so I didn't pick it up. All times were...
you just cant believe anyone operating one of those things on the road, can remotely believe thats an acceptable standard of driving....
Yeah! Get a couple more wheels (or a motor) - that's the way to freedom / romance / sex....
It says on their website "Small leakages can be sustained by continuously adding air via our patented kinetic air pressure system (KAPS)" so for a...
To give the council their due the consultations were torrid affairs. Part of me thinks that they might have been a little less, had they done a...