Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

Near Miss of the Day 284: Punishment pass while riding with a 14-year-old

Video contains strong language

Today’s near miss is a punishment pass of two cyclists in Guernsey. Alex, the cyclist who shot the footage, deliberately stayed outside a friend’s 14-year-old daughter nearer the kerb after noticing how close the car behind was when they pulled away from the lights.

“I was riding home from coaching the children at the local cycling club with a friend’s 14-year-old daughter a couple of weeks ago. We’d just moved away from a set of traffic lights when I became aware of a car pulling up extremely close behind us and the driver repeatedly revving the engine.

“Having passed through the next junction we were subjected to the inevitable punishment pass which, as you can tell from my reaction, despite half expecting it, still caught me off guard with the actual closeness.”

Alex made a formal complaint to Guernsey Police, who interviewed the two cyclists and the driver.

“I was informed by the police shortly afterwards that the file had been submitted for consideration for prosecution to the Law Officers (the local equivalent of the CPS).

“Having had a previous complaint about a close pass thrown out by the Law Officers (when I was left with a broken finger and ended up being told that ‘someone will have to die before anything changes’ ), I looked at the Decision to Prosecute Code of Guidance on their website.”

The Code of Guidance lists examples of common public interest factors tending to favour prosecution:

  • The evidence suggests the offence was premeditated;
  • The offence was committed in the presence of a child;
  • There are grounds for believing the offence is likely to be continued or repeated;
  • The offence, whilst in itself not serious, is prevalent;
  • A prosecution would have significant positive impact on maintaining public confidence.

“Naturally, two weeks later I was informed that, ‘it wasn’t in the public interest’ to prosecute the driver,” said Alex.

“I guess safeguarding the lives of cyclists isn't either.”

> Near Miss of the Day turns 100 - Why do we do the feature and what have we learnt from it?

Over the years road.cc has reported on literally hundreds of close passes and near misses involving badly driven vehicles from every corner of the country – so many, in fact, that we’ve decided to turn the phenomenon into a regular feature on the site. One day hopefully we will run out of close passes and near misses to report on, but until that happy day arrives, Near Miss of the Day will keep rolling on.

If you’ve caught on camera a close encounter of the uncomfortable kind with another road user that you’d like to share with the wider cycling community please send it to us at info [at] road.cc or send us a message via the road.cc Facebook page (link is external).

If the video is on YouTube, please send us a link, if not we can add any footage you supply to our YouTube channel as an unlisted video (so it won't show up on searches).

Please also let us know whether you contacted the police and if so what their reaction was, as well as the reaction of the vehicle operator if it was a bus, lorry or van with company markings etc.

> What to do if you capture a near miss or close pass (or worse) on camera while cycling

> What to do next if you’ve been involved in a road traffic collision

Alex has written for more cricket publications than the rest of the road.cc team combined. Despite the apparent evidence of this picture, he doesn't especially like cake.

Add new comment

17 comments

Avatar
yupiteru | 5 years ago
2 likes

Find the car, drill holes in then sidewalls of the tyres with a cordless drill and superglue the windscreen wipers to the windscreen (at least) or something similar.  They will get the damage repaired obviously but  it will inconvenience them for a day and you will feel a lot better for it, or at least I would.

I wouldn't let someone endanger my daughters life and get away with it, if the Police were not interested then i'm sorry but I would have to do something as my moral responsibility to protect my children.

I would not condone violence, but  my  conscience would keep me awake at night if I didn't feel justice was done.

Avatar
Rick_Rude | 5 years ago
2 likes

Send in legs11. He will find the culprit and bring them to justice.......with extreme prejudice!

Avatar
brooksby replied to Rick_Rude | 5 years ago
0 likes

Rick_Rude wrote:

Send in legs11. He will find the culprit and bring them to justice.......with extreme prejudice!

With extreme prejudice and especially creative use of a paving slab!

Avatar
Hirsute | 5 years ago
2 likes

They are supposed to be green lane - cycle, horse, ped friendly

Still we can remember

https://road.cc/content/news/246199-near-miss-day-165-close-pass-followe...

Shame about the door - I am gutted.

Avatar
kil0ran | 5 years ago
1 like

Small island, should be easy enough to find

Avatar
racyrich | 5 years ago
1 like

Population of 63000 with 86000 vehicles.  Posting it on twitter/facebook/somewhere may well find the owner.  That's if you don't see him again anyway.

Avatar
growingvegtables replied to racyrich | 5 years ago
0 likes

racyrich wrote:

Population of 63000 with 86000 vehicles.  Posting it on twitter/facebook/somewhere may well find the owner.  That's if you don't see him again anyway.

 

86,000 vehicles?  On an island with 260 miles of road?  Naah ... can't be right .

Avatar
BehindTheBikesheds replied to growingvegtables | 5 years ago
4 likes

growingvegtables wrote:

racyrich wrote:

Population of 63000 with 86000 vehicles.  Posting it on twitter/facebook/somewhere may well find the owner.  That's if you don't see him again anyway.

 

86,000 vehicles?  On an island with 260 miles of road?  Naah ... can't be right .

Sadly so https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-guernsey-11211598 it's almost double the number per population head as Jersey. The local gov don't give a fuck, serious road injuries are the same as 10 years ago and fatals are up though there's only two in the last published repeorts. FPN are down massively as are verbal cautions, clearly Guernsey much like everywhere else want to ignore the problem of terrorists using 4 wheeled weapons

Avatar
LastBoyScout replied to growingvegtables | 5 years ago
0 likes

growingvegtables wrote:

racyrich wrote:

Population of 63000 with 86000 vehicles.  Posting it on twitter/facebook/somewhere may well find the owner.  That's if you don't see him again anyway.

86,000 vehicles?  On an island with 260 miles of road?  Naah ... can't be right .

Don't forget Guernsey is a tourist island - quite a few of those vehicles will be hire cars, so I'd be a bit hesitant about payback unless you're absolutely sure it's owned by a resident.

Avatar
grumpyoldcyclist | 5 years ago
4 likes

So it's pre-meditated and in the presence of a child, might be worth asking those Law Oficers why they did not see fit to prosecute, when the police obviously did think there was a case.

Avatar
Simon E replied to grumpyoldcyclist | 5 years ago
6 likes

grumpyoldcyclist wrote:

So it's pre-meditated and in the presence of a child, might be worth asking those Law Oficers why they did not see fit to prosecute, when the police obviously did think there was a case.

If that's their attitude then don't waste your time with the plod, they're part of the problem. Guernsey's a small island. Find the car and slash the tyres.

Avatar
plymouthgreen replied to Simon E | 5 years ago
1 like
Simon E wrote:

grumpyoldcyclist wrote:

So it's pre-meditated and in the presence of a child, might be worth asking those Law Oficers why they did not see fit to prosecute, when the police obviously did think there was a case.

If that's their attitude then don't waste your time with the plod, they're part of the problem. Guernsey's a small island. Find the car and slash the tyres.

It clearly states the CPS(law officers) made the decision not the Police

Avatar
zero_trooper | 5 years ago
1 like

Unfortunately ‘not in the public interest’ covers a multitude of sins.

In these circumstances (vulnerable road users) surely a better explanation was warranted?

Avatar
Judge dreadful | 5 years ago
0 likes

Now that is a Bollox close pass. Absolutely no need for that. Get it reported.

Avatar
growingvegtables | 5 years ago
8 likes

That boils my piss.

1500+kg of vehicle + brain-dead driver's entitlement ... v a 14-year-old on 12kg of alloy?

And it's NOT in the public interest to prosecute? WTAF?

Avatar
burtthebike | 5 years ago
9 likes

Isn't Guernsey one of those anti-cycling places with a helmet law?  I guess the hatred of cyclists must go pretty deep if this clearly demonstrated dangerous, premeditated driving isn't worth prosecuting because it was only cyclists.

Avatar
Sriracha | 5 years ago
10 likes

If other criteria are met (eg premeditation, in the presence of a child), then informing the culprit that their behaviour has been witnessed by police and officially judged to not merit sanction, surely this is against the public interest since it will naturally embolden the culprit to repeat the behaviour and entrench their attitudes against vulnerable road users.

Latest Comments