Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

Phil Gaimon responds on Fabian Cancellara 'motor doping' row

American former pro insists comments in his book have been taken out of context

American former professional cyclist Phil Gaimon has issued a statement seeking to clarify comments he made in his newly-published book, Draft Animals, regarding Fabian Cancellara in which he said the Swiss rider “probably did have a motor” when winning certain major races.

As we reported yesterday, lawyers acting on behalf of Cancellara, currently on his way to Las Vegas for a corporate event, have insisted that the book be withdrawn from distribution.

> Fabian Cancellara's lawyers demand recall of Phil Gaimon's book and apology over motor doping claims

The Swiss rider’s manager, meanwhile, has called on Gaimon, who like Cancellara retired in 2016, to issue a public apology for his remarks.

Tweeting a link to the page on his website where his statement has been published, former Cannondale-Drapac rider Gaimon said that the person who handles his PR is on holiday this week.

He insisted that the passage about Cancellara, who has vehemently denied using illegal mechanical assistance since accusations were first levelled against him after his Tour of Flanders and Paris-Roubaix double in 2010, had been taken out of context.

“In Draft Animals, I repeated a rumour that’s well-documented and many years old, and I presented it as such,” Gaimon wrote.

“I stand by my opinion, but it’s exactly that, and anyone who actually opened the book would know that what I said was far from an ‘accusation’.

“Put a gun to my head and that’s what I believe so I’d be a liar if I left it out, but I claim no revelations or proof, so I don’t see it being ‘taken off the shelves’ except by the folks buying it.

“Ironically, that part in the book is dismissing conspiracy theories about motors today as clickbait, and it’s now been turned into clickbait.”

He continued: “My friendship with Tom Danielson is a big part of the story, so usually when I get hate mail, it’s calling me a hypocrite for not being enough of a ‘doper hater’.

“I didn’t expect this to be pulled out of context or turned into mudslinging, and I’m sorry for anyone who’s wasted time or energy on it. That’s not how I wanted to sell books, and it’s not worth this headache.

“There were some things I had to get off my chest and some tough times to share to give a picture of the sport as I experienced it, but if a juicy tell-all is what you’re looking for, don’t bother buying it.

“I don’t reference any scandal you haven’t heard before, and I’ll probably show empathy towards dopers that you want me to hate,” he added. “I expect that type of reader will be disappointed.”

Gaimon’s comments about Cancellara have been widely reported in the specialist cycling press and beyond, and the UCI has said that it may investigate the allegations.

> UCI may look into motor doping claims against Fabian Cancellara

In his book, he wrote:

I dismissed it [talk of a hidden motor] until I heard his former teammates talk about certain events where Cancellara had his own mechanic, his bike was kept separate from everyone else's, and he rode away from a ‘who's who’ of dopers.

When you watch the footage, his accelerations don't look natural at all, like he's having trouble staying on the top of the pedals.

That fucker probably did have a motor.

What will no doubt exercise the minds of lawyers on both sides, should the argument continue, is how much of what he wrote reflected what was already in the public domain – the fact that Cancellara was accused of using a concealed motor several years ago – and to what extent Gaimon was expressing an opinion that he believed that to be the case.

In the meantime, Draft Animals, published last month in the US by Penguin Books, remains on sale through Amazon and other outlets.

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

17 comments

Avatar
alansmurphy | 7 years ago
0 likes

So who puts the original story in the public domain without evidence? Is it there now because it's been said here, Fab could say he read it on road cc. .

Avatar
Bob F | 7 years ago
0 likes

All I'm hearing is noizzzzz....

 

Avatar
Anthony.C | 7 years ago
0 likes

This is all just great publicity for his book at Cancellara's expense, it's shameful.

Avatar
philhubbard replied to Anthony.C | 7 years ago
0 likes
Anthony.C wrote:

This is all just great publicity for his book at Cancellara's expense, it's shameful.

 

Gaimon never asked for this comment to be picked up by the media and splashed around, I'm sure you can find several other comments similar to this in his books if you tried

Avatar
Anthony.C replied to philhubbard | 7 years ago
0 likes
philhubbard wrote:
Anthony.C wrote:

This is all just great publicity for his book at Cancellara's expense, it's shameful.

 

Gaimon never asked for this comment to be picked up by the media and splashed around, I'm sure you can find several other comments similar to this in his books if you tried

How do you think the media picked that line out of the book ? That's why he has a publicist.

Avatar
Jimmy Ray Will | 7 years ago
2 likes

Still on the side of Gaimon here, I also share theview that the wording used in the book is a lot cleverer 'legally' than it may initially look. 

I am sure things will carry on for a few more days before going quiet and get forgotten. 

Avatar
ColT | 7 years ago
3 likes

Fair play to Gaimon. Needs more like him to cut through all the bullshit clouding the truth about pro cycling.

Probably

Avatar
Nuclear Dan | 7 years ago
3 likes

Gaimon would easily win in court, the allegations first surfaced in 2010.

Cancellara has had seven years to sue anyone making them.

It would be difficult to demonstrate loss of earnings or reputation for a story that old or that well known.

Secondly he could claim "honest opinion" this is a UK specific defence with analogues in other domains. This provision is that an "honest person" could have held this opinion.

Thus the defence is, I looked at the videos, his attack is beyond what I think a person could have done unaided. This is my opinion.

The plaintiff would have to show that an honest person with the information available to the person making the statement could not come to that conclusion. Or that the statement had a reckless disregard for the truth.

I think there is enough "evidence" for someone to hold this opinion.

Avatar
The_Vermonter | 7 years ago
2 likes

It was a flippant comment about something that has long been discussed. Luigi, his lawyers, and everyone else need to chill. 

Avatar
atlaz | 7 years ago
0 likes

He makes comments about other former pros too which are equally likely to get him into trouble. Not least because one of them shares a sponsor, Mavic, with him. 

Avatar
alansmurphy | 7 years ago
0 likes

And that continued to be the problem, he says he's standing by his opinion and would with a gun to his head but it's not an accusation.

What if someone's opinion of him equated to those about many in the US movie industry at the moment, would Fabio be able to state "he's probably a bit of a fucking sex offender"?

Strangely, I've been watching Gaimon's YouTube and enjoyed it, thought he was a bit of a laugh. May have to hit unsubscribe.

Avatar
Carton replied to alansmurphy | 7 years ago
0 likes
alansmurphy wrote:

would Fabio be able to state "he's probably a bit of a fucking sex offender"?

I think Fabio could probably get away with being a bit of a sex offender. 

As for Fabian, I still don't think that he did it, but the way he has dealt with the whole thing from the beginning (see the answer he gave Caley Fretz way back when), isn't exactly making me a fan.

Avatar
Nuclear Dan replied to Carton | 7 years ago
0 likes
Carton wrote:
alansmurphy wrote:

would Fabio be able to state "he's probably a bit of a fucking sex offender"?

I think Fabio could probably get away with being a bit of a sex offender. 

As for Fabian, I still don't think that he did it, but the way he has dealt with the whole thing from the beginning (see the answer he gave Caley Fretz way back when), isn't exactly making me a fan.

In short, no Cancellara could not get away with making up a story about Phil Gaimon being a sex offender.

There is no Gaimon sex offender allegations in the public domain.

Thus stating an opinion on them would be to make a false allegation with zero evidence and given the current situation lots of evidence for malice. Hence pretty much a text book libel case.

Avatar
Miller | 7 years ago
0 likes

Gaimon must always have known that sentence was going to be controversial, being a slanderous claim against a major rider. It's a bit late to be retreating from the statement.

Avatar
fukawitribe replied to Miller | 7 years ago
1 like
Miller wrote:

Gaimon must always have known that sentence was going to be controversial, being a slanderous claim against a major rider. It's a bit late to be retreating from the statement.

He's not.

Avatar
Woldsman | 7 years ago
0 likes

Am I missing something here? Surely it’s one thing to pass comment on a matter, say in the pub with mates, but quite another to put a damaging comment in a book and shrug off the concerns of the other party’s lawyers by saying it’a just an ‘opinion’. What the actual flip? 

Avatar
HalfWheeler | 7 years ago
1 like

"True story: my PR guy is on vacation this week"

Which explains the clueless response.

Latest Comments