A Royal Marine has told a court that he has been put off cycling for life after being hit by a turning delivery driver while waiting on his bike to join a main road.
Devon Live reports that Adam Fradley was at the junction of Nutwell Road waiting to turn right towards Exmouth on July 19 last year when Mark Bettridge, driving a Vauxhall Zafira, turned right off the main road and smashed into him.
“He was sat in the middle of the junction when the defendant turned right and for reasons unknown failed to see the cyclist and collided with him,” said Lyndsey Baker, prosecuting.
“He caused the cyclist to be thrown into the air onto the windscreen and onto the ground. He suffered multiple fractures including ribs and clavicle.
“He was taken to the Royal Devon & Exeter hospital then taken to Derriford, spending eight days in total, four of those in the intensive care unit.”
Fradley said he didn’t notice the van until it crossed the central white line and cut across the corner of the designated turning area. “I could hear the motor revving as he came at me, making no attempt to stop,” he said.
Bettridge said he did not see Fradley until he heard a “massive bang” and saw him go over his front window.
Fradley, who tended to cycle five or six times a week during the summer months, said he would never be able to ride on the road again.
“It is a void I’m going to struggle to fill – it’s put me off cycling for life,” he said.
Bettridge pleaded guilty at Exeter Magistrates’ Court to one charge of driving without due care and attention. He was handed six penalty points and fined £350 with £120 in costs.
District Judge Stephen Nicholls said the incident had been serious but was the result of a momentary lapse in concentration.
“The effect was that you collided with a cyclist, causing him severe injuries which have had a long-lasting impact.”






















41 thoughts on “Marine was put off cycling after being hospitalised by corner-cutting delivery driver”
What? No ban?! Sigh.
What? No ban?! Sigh.
‘The result of a momentary
‘The result of a momentary lapse in concentration’
BOLLOCKS. He was driving carelessly, and clearly didn’t look. At all.
Judge is a Grade A Wankpuffin.
STiG911 wrote:
Have you got copyright on this?
Ah, the all-purpose “excuse”
Ah, the all-purpose “excuse” that works every time: “I didn’t see him”.
reliablemeatloaf wrote:
Should’ve worn hi-viz, spoke reflectors and a helmet.
reliablemeatloaf wrote:
You’d think it would be treated as an admission of guilt, not as an excuse…
I got a bigger fine than that
I got a bigger fine than that for driving too close to the car in front; he put somebody in feking intensive care.
Oh, but I was endangering a motorist……….
If you have demonstrated that
If you have demonstrated that you cannot see something as large as a cyclist in front of you in broad daylight there should be no room for discussion ever: “Sorry mate, you are banned from operating a vehicle ever again. And, in addition, if you are involved in any other incident of any sort in which your visual perception is the evidence, then that evidence shall be discounted as provably unreliable.”
I suspect the driver may wish
I suspect the driver may wish he had secure walls around him when a group of marines pay him a visit.
Wonder whether anyone
Wonder whether anyone bothered to check his phone for use?
I set off 3seconds early from
I set off 3seconds early from a traffic light on my push bike and got fined £250. Maybe I’d have been better off getting in plods car and running him over…
alansmurphy wrote:
But plod do care if you drive at a policeman, for some reason.
To misquote The Clash:
You don’t have the right to not be run over,
Running over someone is not a crime,
Unless you run over … a policeman.
depressing…simply
depressing…simply depressing.
“Bettridge pleaded guilty at
“Bettridge pleaded guilty at Exeter Magistrates’ Court to one charge of driving without due care and attention. He was handed six penalty points and fined £350 with £120 in costs.
District Judge Stephen Nicholls said the incident had been serious but was the result of a momentary lapse in concentration.”
British justice at its finest. Six penalty points for being so incompetent that he couldn’t even see a stationary object in front of him in broad daylight, exactly where it should have been, but he can get back in his van and drive again tomorrow. You can kill someone in a car and still drive; this is insanity and the law is an ass.
This wasn’t by any definition driving without due care and attention, or a momentary lapse of concentration, it was dangerous behaviour with a deadly weapon and it is only luck that the victime isn’t dead.
When is the government inquiry into safety on the roads reporting?
burtthebike wrote:
‘momentary’ my left B)**($k
this was a bad habit of his that he’d gotten away with many times before…
Six points. You get that for
Six points. You get that for driving without insurance. Pitiful.
Luck for the driver. If the
Luck for the driver. If the Marine wasn’t injured as badly, he’d have kicked sebmveb shades of shit out of the driver. Don’t want to go upsetting RMs, they’re hardy feckers.
I’m lost for words at how
I’m lost for words at how much of a piss poor ‘justice’ system the UK has. A measly fine and points on his licence for putting someone in intensive care is nothing short of an insult.
The driver cut the corner, as
The driver cut the corner, as so very many do. I can almost accept the momentary lapse of concentration but the fact he entered the junction incorrectly could only be a premeditated action. That therefore negates any momentary lapse of concentration in my book.
1961BikiE wrote:
Well, exactly. Twats that cut corners when turning right really boil my piss. I turn right onto a main road every morning and the number of wankers who swerve across the junction is ridiculous. Mind you, it doesn’t help that some cunt parks his BT van half on the pavement near the junction just make visibility that bit worse.
I’m living in the US, at the
I’m living in the US, at the moment, and as much as I dislike the tendancy to file law suits here over nothing, if this crash had happened here, the cyclist would be able to get a huge payout (which would fall to the drivers insurance company).
Cutting a corner like that is crazy. I’ve had the same thing happen when in a car, and the car cutting the corner used the left side of my lane as the apex for his cut … so his car went between my left hand wing mirror and the left hand foot path. I was in a red honda accord, so very very clearly visible. The driver had just decided that the public roads were his private race track and he was going to do a Lewis Hamilton.
Drive like a knob, ten year ban. Drive like a knob twice, lifetime ban!!!!
Glad to see the ‘strict laws
Glad to see the ‘strict laws we have in place’ to ‘ensure’ justice is done coming into full effect again. And why can seemingly no fucker turn right properly anymore, for the sake of what, two seconds.
Bunch of cock.
Well, we will keep on
Well, we will keep on employing judges with syphilis.
Get well soon Frads. Shame
Get well soon Frads. Shame you’re still at Headly Court while the RMCC is out on the 28th. Bet your gutted. Probably would get free wets all night.
I hope the judge’s dearest
I hope the judge’s dearest get mown down by some imbecilic prick like this. What a disgrace.
Yup. 3 points and £100 for
Yup. 3 points and £100 for this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WMD-aRyLrtU
Cyclists fault. OC had
Cyclists fault. OC had warned them about cycling in camo suits….
BarryBianchi wrote:
they should make hi-viz camouflage
ConcordeCX wrote:
They do …
CygnusX1 wrote:
Wow. Makes your entire cock & balls disappear. Takes an ambient temperature of less than 23c to make mine do that.
How the hell can this be seen
How the hell can this be seen as “momentary lapse in concentration” when the knob had made the deliberate decision to cut across the Corner??? It is clearly dangerous driving.
lindow_man wrote:
That’s all that’s required when one is drifting the corner at 60…
I see corner cutting all the
I see corner cutting all the time. It is not a lapse in concentration, it’s a choice and a dangerous one; therefore dangerous driving.
Another rant: quote prosecutor “He was sat in the middle of the junction”. He wasn’t SAT, he was sitting. I despair when people who’ve had a university education can’t speak English.
Quote:
A momentry lapse in concentration you say? Well that’s all right then.
In my (very limited) knowledge of the law – I understand that the cyclist can still make a civil action for damages (that is probbly badly pharased) – if he has insurance, then he should get help in doing this. The gilty verdict from the legal case should essentially prove liability.
Must be Mad wrote:
it’s the gold standard…
Holy crap. “a momentary
Holy crap. “a momentary lapse in concentration.”? Just “driving without due care and attention”? Oh, that’s all right then.
This sounds like one for the CDF to appeal, to be honest. A Marine, who doubtless has showed courage while acting in the service of the country, no longer feels able to cycle on the roads of the country because of some prick who “couldn’t see” something right in front of him? It’s a fucking disgrace.
Unfortunately its about as
Unfortunately its about as good a result as can be expected.
Had a driver pull out of a junction in front of me, winters evening, I did everything to make myself visible (lights/hi-viz) and they still pulled out in front of me. Result – cyclist face plants onto car, bike written off, helmet written off thankfully no significant injuries to me….. and the driver gets 3 points and £100 fine for driving without due care and attention.
Stuff like this is enough to
Stuff like this is enough to make you join the Mail brigade and petition for super prisons to be built, and a tripling of the UK’s prison capacity. The desire not to overload prisons apart from the worst offenders lies behind much of the sentencing leniency.
rliu wrote:
should be far easier, killing a human being through reckless action (how you ‘carelessly’ kill someone I’ll never know!) should be given a similar punishment, a death penalty means no extra cost to society for the worst in our society, similarly other serious criminals, why should tax payers stump the costs of these animals!
Seriously injuring someone should see them shamed in public and put on a register and castigated like a paedophile, banned from driving a motorvehicle for life, chipped so that they have to register every week with plod to submit to checks. Afterall the impact of harming a human being in this way does and has a lifetimes impact.
Our so called ‘justice’ system just allows those that kill and maim back into society to carry on as before without batting an eyelid, if their crime was using a large mass with an engine as their weapon of choice. This has to stop as the lack of action is a crime against society/humanity and is proven to be so.
BehindTheBikesheds wrote:
should be far easier, killing a human being through reckless action (how you ‘carelessly’ kill someone I’ll never know!) should be given a similar punishment, a death penalty means no extra cost to society for the worst in our society, similarly other serious criminals, why should tax payers stump the costs of these animals!
Seriously injuring someone should see them shamed in public and put on a register and castigated like a paedophile, banned from driving a motorvehicle for life, chipped so that they have to register every week with plod to submit to checks. Afterall the impact of harming a human being in this way does and has a lifetimes impact.
Our so called ‘justice’ system just allows those that kill and maim back into society to carry on as before without batting an eyelid, if their crime was using a large mass with an engine as their weapon of choice. This has to stop as the lack of action is a crime against society/humanity and is proven to be so.— rliu
crucifixion gets my vote – nail them up, nail some sense into them!
beezus fufoon wrote:
“Well, at least it gets you out in the open air.”
/Python