test

And this Ladies and Gentlemen is how councils up and down the land waste your money. The contracts will have been costed and awarded. Penalties will now be owed by the council to its contractors for cancelling the start of works at short notice - likely funded out of the original active travel budget.

@Rendel Harris Not everything that is publicly (co-)funded is a public good and even fewer of those are indispensable. Just because it was partly funded from the public purse does not mean it's meant to be free - and especially if there are other benefits for the public. If we assume otherwise, there should be no obligation to pay for bus rides. And let's not fool ourselves - if the ceremony was free, the organisers would simply charge the local govt even more for the event overall. Of these two imperfect options I'd rather shift at least part of he burden on the rich spectators willing to pay for the tickets.

@tomlew The Tour is very much more than just a private event, it has taken nearly £100M in public money to come to the Uk. If it was self funding like a rock concert, fine, charge what you want, but having taken such a vast sum of money from the public and expecting their goodwill in terms of putting up with road closures etc said public have every right to be disgruntled at the attempt to sting them for even more to see part of an event that they’ve already paid for. As the article notes, other Grand Depart presentations have been free, why shouldn’t this one be? Your statement “it’s easy to spend other people’s money” would appear most apposite for ASO, with the addendum “then expect them to give you even more whilst you trouser the enormous profits.”

Road.cc staff all ride like Pogačar? Sounds dubious to me.

@Rome73 I assume You don't have video evidence. As it would be worth submitting to the DVSA to let them know that driver's eyesight is poor enough to have their licence revoked.

@Rendel Harris If only you'd read my previous comment more carefully... I clearly justified my position by appealing to the concept of a public good. The TdF isn't one, so why are you demanding to decide how the investor should spend their money? That is exactly the middle ground you're talking about — leaving control in the hands of the owners when the goods in question are not indispensable, while retaining control over essential ones. BTW, monopoly? I imagine there are hundreds of other public events in most UK towns. Are you going to hire an army of public officers and introduce price regulation for rock concerts as well?

@tomlew Yes, there's absolutely no middle ground between disgracefully exploitative overcharging and giving things away for free, is there? Just sit back and accept whatever private companies want to charge once they have achieved a monopoly of something and be happy, marvellous. Don't complain or ask for fair pricing because that would be "spending someone else's money". It's worked so well with water and power and fuel and rent, hasn't it?

@Rendel Harris So where's my new bike? I feel I deserve it, so I guess you owe me one now. It's always so easy to spend somebody else's money, isn't it?

@tomlew Ah, good old "market forces", the excuse for price gouging everywhere. Just because you can get away with charging stupid prices doesn't mean you should or that it's right to do so.

I bought mine more than 4 years ago and have used it many times, flying all over Europe - exclusively with BA. The baggage handlers have given them a good thumping. We've had the frame itself dented significantly and pierced (one assumes - and Ed from Buxumbox confirms - this is hard to do on the shell cage!) The sides are dented, as expected, and were pierced on one occasion. We witnessed a baggage handler at Tenerife airport lift and throw our boxes onto the conveyor belt single handed. It bounced off the edge of the belt at least once. One of the boxes also started to behave like a shopping trolley so I have replaced the front wheels (now a new design) and I was told that this is due to the box being dropped onto them. The bikes have - up to now - always survived this handling. Does anyone have any tips on how to dissuade a single baggage handler do this? Do you overestimate the weight so that they might be inclined to get two baggage handler to move them? They are certainly great for quick disassembly and re-assembly, albeit a pain to get a taxi for. A Mercedes Vito with the rear seats down or removed, a Renault Scenic likewise. Two (with two small cases) also fit inside a Dacia Jogger with the rear seats down - perhaps we should have a database...?