The campaign group Cycling UK has endorsed the London Mayor’s announcement that he will “ensure the most dangerous zero star-rated lorries are removed from our roads”.
Sadiq Khan has pledged that the most dangerous HGVs will not be allowed in the capital by the year 2020, using a ‘star rating’ from 0 to 5 stars to rate construction and other heavy goods vehicles based on the level of vision the driver has directly from the cab.
Transport for London’s (TfL) Direct Vision Standard is a world first, developed in response to the fact that despite making up only 4% of London traffic, lorries are disproportionally involved in London cyclists’ deaths.
Between January 2008 and July 2015, 56 of the 99 cyclists killed in London were involved in incidents with lorries.
Cycling UK responded to TfL consultation ‘Further improving lorry safety in London’, in February 2016 and called for TfL and all 33 London boroughs to express a preference towards direct vision lorries in all future bids for planning applications and publicly-funded contracts.
Furthermore, Cycling UK urged TfL to adopt a road map for the widespread introduction of direct vision lorries which would make their use a contractual requirement by 2020 for TfL and the boroughs, with a commitment to ban lorries which do not meet direct vision standards from London roads by 2025.
Duncan Dollimore, Cycling UK’s Senior Road Safety and Legal Campaigns Officer said: “Cycling UK is delighted that the Mayor is committed to introducing a road map that will see unsafe lorries off our roads, and safer direct vision lorries the norm. We would now urge TfL and the 33 London boroughs to make safer lorries a contractual preference for all future bids to hasten their uptake.
“Cycling UK called for this back in February through our ‘Safer Lorries’ campaign, and we see today’s announcement as a first step towards removing all unsafe lorries from our roads. We sincerely hope London’s innovative solution to the lorry problem will catch on, and rapidly spread throughout the whole country.”
The TfL website states: “Understanding how much HGV drivers can see from their cab is essential in reducing the risk of collisions. Greater awareness of an HGV driver's direct vision will also lead to an increase in the demand and supply of safer vehicles.
“At TfL, we will work with vehicle manufacturers and invite all HGVs to be modelled and rated against the Direct Vision Standard. This work will help operators and their clients to make informed choices when buying HGVs.”
Earlier this year we reported how a north London waste disposal firm has bought three trucks offering drivers the kind of panoramic view recommended by cycling campaigners.
O’Donovan’s Mercedes Econic vehicles are thought to be the first of their kind used in Britain.
So-called ‘direct vision cabs’ increase the driver’s field of view in front and to the sides of a lorry.
As well as offering a panoramic view, the cube-shaped cabs also feature full-length glass doors to help minimise blind spots.
There are several versions of the £100,000 Econic with O’Donovans to make use of the skip lorry.
Jacqueline O’Donovan, the firm’s managing director, said: “We want to ensure our drivers have the best training and safest vehicles. The Mercedes cabs really are safer.”
O’Donovan also requested a range of additional safety features, including a side scan system, side under run protection, left hand turn audible alarm and conspicuity markings.
Last September London implemented the Safer Lorries Scheme which demands that all HGVs operating in the capital must be fitted with certain safety equipment, including sideguards and improved mirrors. Nevertheless, most campaigners would like to see further improvements.
I'm in the empty car parking zone as defined by the short bay markings, the truck is actually over the centre line from the time of first...
"Not completely waterproof", you say...? That's a no from me.
Interestingly if you ask it for an academic style of writing with references it will produce that, and some of the references may well be relevant...
Do we know if TRL were even in the hat? Or should the commissioning process be bypassed in contentious issues? ...
I'm drooling over those extra large runtimes and solar charging. Could really use those on my multi day long-distance forays, it would save the...
I have alao noticed that and pollitics seems to be the cause quite often.
I don't know about this. It's not exactly a Swiss watch of mechanical complexity. It's less design copying than it is the minimum structural...
Ghost-bikes in prominent places are a London 'favourite' since no human is at additional risk and there's plenty of time for the stationary traffic...
How about air bags on the outside, but not on the inside?
Could be. They've also splashed out and repainted some give way markings where redways cross roads, some at junctions where cyclists often don't....