Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

US church says bike lane would infringe upon its ‘rights of religious freedom’

Proposes alternative route which would pass three other churches

A church in Washington DC has objected to a mooted bike lane near its property on the grounds that it would infringe upon “its constitutionally protected rights of religious freedom.”

The District Department of Transportation (DDOT) is looking into where it can install a protected bike lane on the east side of downtown. The United House of Prayer is located in the 600 block of M Street NW and three of four possible bike lane routes would run along 6th Street NW on the same block.

- Campaigners welcome two new bike lanes for Leicester, at £3m

The WashCycle blog reports that the church has written to the director of DDOT claiming that restricting free parking on public streets nearby "would place an extreme burden on the free exercise of religion". The church says that DDOT lets cars park diagonally on the street during busy times and that this would be impossible if a protected bike lane were on the street.

The possibility that people might cycle to the church would appear to be so unlikely as to not even warrant acknowledgement.

"The encroachment is entirely unnecessary to achieve DDOT's goal of increasing bicycle rights of way," said the church, adding: “As you know, bicycles have freely and safely traversed the District of Columbia throughout the 90-year history of the United House of Prayer, without any protected bicycle lanes and without infringing in the least on the United House of Prayer’s religious rights.”

The church outlines an alternative route which would see the bike path take a detour to avoid the parking spaces. The detour in question would pass no fewer than three other churches.

- Pedestrian crossings and painted bike logos on asphalt: Westminster's latest "Quietway"

This is, apparently, not the first time that a DC church has objected to a bike lane. St John's Episcopal Church complained on similar grounds in 1995 and in the early stages of this same project, the Metropolitan AME church made the same claim. In the latter case, the city eventually agreed to make the bike lane unprotected in front of the church – a decision cycling campaigners said would set a dangerous precedent.

DDOT spokesman Terry Owens told the Washington Post that the bike lane study will last until the end of the year.

Alex has written for more cricket publications than the rest of the road.cc team combined. Despite the apparent evidence of this picture, he doesn't especially like cake.

Add new comment

15 comments

Avatar
Matt eaton | 8 years ago
0 likes

Motorists assume the god-given right to park whereever they fancy without consideration for anyone else. Hardly news is it?

Avatar
InvisibleVisibleMan | 8 years ago
1 like

To the people saying, "burn the church to the ground," I'd point out that this church is a historically black church and that many of these churches have recently apparently been victims or arson attacks by racists. So it's not a tremendously tasteful thing to write.

That said, there are some real issues here (which I wrote about here: http://invisiblevisibleman.blogspot.com/2015/07/an-old-fashioned-prejudi... ). Many US urban churches (including, to some extent, the one to which I cycle every Sunday) serve a population that once used to live near the church but has since either been priced out or fled to the suburbs. My own church has large numbers of African-Caribbean members who used to live in Park Slope, the area round the church. Barely any of them live there any longer, since it's now become one of the most expensive areas in the entire city.

The people that attend these churches - relatively new members of the comfortable middle class, living in suburbs, often relatively old and commuting many miles to more central areas for services - are, unfortunately, exactly the kind of people that don't cycle in the US. It is, apart from anything else, pretty terrifying to cycle in most suburban areas over here. Cars also remain a symbol of respectability for many such people.

I imagine that the people in the church look on parking outside the church as vital to their communal life. The people are probably commuting in from Prince George's county in Maryland and such areas and it's the only time in the week they spend back in the old neighbourhoods in central Washington. I think, obviously, that the cycle lane should go in, as an interrupted cycle lane is pretty useless. I also think that all kinds of religious organisations should think harder about the morality of driving. But I think what I've described is the context for this case.

Avatar
Bmblbzzz | 8 years ago
1 like

“As you know, bicycles have freely and safely traversed the District of Columbia throughout the 90-year history of the United House of Prayer, without any protected bicycle lanes and without infringing in the least on the United House of Prayer’s religious rights.” 

At what point in that 90 year history did the majority of worshippers start arriving by car? 

Avatar
tourdelound | 8 years ago
1 like

Maybe they could park on the "sidewalk"?, seems to have caught on in the UK fairly well. 

Avatar
OldRidgeback | 8 years ago
0 likes

Is the cycle lane only for use by agnostics, atheists or people of other faiths then?

Avatar
don simon fbpe | 8 years ago
0 likes

Quote:

The WashCycle blog (link is external) reports that the church has written to the director of DDOT claiming that restricting free parking on public streets nearby "would place an extreme burden on the free exercise of religion" - See more at: http://road.cc/content/news/168986-us-church-says-bike-lane-would-infrin...

There's something ironic going on here that I can't quite figure out.

Avatar
Iamnot Wiggins | 8 years ago
3 likes

Burn the church to the ground.

Avatar
PaulBox replied to Iamnot Wiggins | 8 years ago
0 likes

Iamnot Wiggins wrote:

Burn the church to the ground.

 

This.

Avatar
aladdin pain replied to Iamnot Wiggins | 8 years ago
0 likes

Iamnot Wiggins wrote:

Burn the church to the ground.

Per esteemed podcaster Scott Carrier, thirty churches burn down in the U.S. each week.  Cyclists can probably preserve the scant goodwill afforded them by the larger community by simply waiting a few weeks for a dickless southern racist or crack-smoking fundamentalist to do the burning for them. 

Avatar
Ziptie | 8 years ago
5 likes

They have a point  3

Voighticus 22:14: "... and yea the Lord did say that only those who drive a car to church shall have salvation. Spies, apostates and children of the lycra shall not be permitted to seek salvation through worship, they shall be cast aside to the nearest independent coffee shop that does nice cakes after smashing out a few dozen k's on a Sunday morning."

Avatar
Wolfshade | 8 years ago
0 likes

Psh, rubbish reason is rubbish.

Parking ones car is not a religious expression.

It is the same argument that shop owners say when 20 zones, or pedestrianising,  and other cycling infrastructure is put outside their shops that it will limit the visitors.

Of course if this church were truely concerned for its congrgation then it would have a shower block and cycle parking as Jem PT points out, looking after its congregations physical as well as spiritual well being.

Avatar
riotgibbon | 8 years ago
1 like

I've always maintained that the 'parsons bike' is the ultimate machine of all time - ancient, rusted, never once maintained, yet travels forever across all forms of terrain in the service of the faithful and the needy

possibly matched with the ultimate mechanic ....

Avatar
Jem PT | 8 years ago
2 likes

Only in Amnerica! How about the congregation cycles to church (possibly using the new bike lane) and then the parking spaces wouldn't be needed? The congregation would lose weight/be fitter and the air around the church and the town in general would be cleaner. Win win situation!!

Avatar
Orbea Mike | 8 years ago
13 likes

As a Vicar (and Methodist Minister) I use my bike to go between (often) three churches on a Sunday morning.  Perhaps someone should point out to the church in question that freedom of religion (Christian version) existed for the best part of two millenia before cars were invented, so the use and parking of motor vehicles would not seem to be vital to its continuing existence.  1  

Avatar
notfastenough replied to Orbea Mike | 8 years ago
0 likes

Orbea Mike wrote:

As a Vicar (and Methodist Minister) I use my bike to go between (often) three churches on a Sunday morning.  Perhaps someone should point out to the church in question that freedom of religion (Christian version) existed for the best part of two millenia before cars were invented, so the use and parking of motor vehicles would not seem to be vital to its continuing existence.  1  

I have a vision of you finishing a sermon, whipping off the robes to reveal full lycra, clip-clopping out to an Orbea road bike, and smashing it to the next venue.  Fab.

Latest Comments