A cyclist has told of how he confused Google’s self-driving car – by trackstanding at a junction. Google says it welcomes the incident, as it helps the software behind the technology learn about bike riders' behaviour.
Posting on the Road Bike Review forum, site user Oxtox described his encounter with the vehicle as he rode his fixed-gear bike.
He wrote:
A Google self-driving Lexus has been in my neighbourhood for the last couple of weeks doing some road testing.
Near the end of my ride today, we both stopped at an intersection with 4-way stop signs.
The car got to the stop line a fraction of a second before I did, so it had the ROW [right of way]. I did a trackstand and waited for it to continue on through.
It apparently detected my presence (it's covered in Go-Pros) and stayed stationary for several seconds. It finally began to proceed, but as it did, I rolled forward an inch while still standing. The car immediately stopped ...
I continued to stand, it continued to stay stopped. Then as it began to move again, I had to rock the bike to maintain balance. It stopped abruptly.
We repeated this little dance for about 2 full minutes and the car never made it past the middle of the intersection. The two guys inside were laughing and punching stuff into a laptop, I guess trying to modify some code to 'teach' the car something about how to deal with the situation.
Google has been testing driverless technology in a variety of vehicles including its own prototype ‘pods’ for several years, with one of its features being the ability to predict the behaviour of road users including cyclists and pedestrians.
The vehicles - or rather, the tech and software behind them - are, understandably, cautious to the extreme. The firm has said that there have been 11 minor road incidents in the six years in which they have been tested and that all bar one were caused by the drivers of other vehicles. In the sole incident caused by a Google car, it was being driven in manual mode by a member of staff.
Dmitri Dolgov, the head of software for the self-driving car project, has said Google's software is getting better at predicting the behaviour of pedestrians and other road users and cited one example in which a Google car paused when a cyclist ran a red light, while another car, driven by a human, continued and nearly hit them. The firm’s co-founder, Sergey Brin, says the goal is to create something that is safer than human drivers.
Earlier this year, it emerged that the company had patented technology that recognises cyclists’ hand signals as the technology evolves to assess and predict the behaviour of vulnerable road users with the overarching goal of improving safety for all.
The learning curve has now apparently expanded to include cyclists who are trackstanding.
A spokeswoman for Google told the Washington Post that the incident provides a good example of the feedback the company, now trialling the concept in areas such as Austin, Texas as well as near its headquarters in Mountain View, California, wants to get.
As for the trackstanding cyclist’s opinion of the encounter, Oxtox added:
The odd thing is that even tho it was a bit of a CF, I felt safer dealing with a self-driving car than a human-operated one.
Here's mine, which is just cycling outside no zwift
Left pub...crossing road to get sweets...police unable to determine if traffic light green or amber......
Not sure this is a taxi. The vehicle doesn't appear on the list of registered taxis in Oxford, plus one of the vehicles at their depot has "Private...
I have absolutely no idea what you are getting at there . . . . . .
yes porpoising has been around since well before CFD existed, its a well known ground effect phenomenon, but I do think the worst extremes we are...
I purchased a Ribble on Jan 6th 2022 and it finally arrived on the 22nd June 2022....A painful wait!
And just like that, probably not PBU but another of the same set of drive-through opinions did precisely that on t'other thread.
This is quite right , frankly I don't think the plod want to be bothered with these pesky cyclists, they actually have the affrontery to take up...
"Feel" / "had to"....
Thank you, most enlightening.