Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Man convicted of punching fellow cyclist in road rage attack

Graeme Brankin carried out a second attack 11 months later

Herald Scotland reports that a Dundee man who punched a fellow cyclist over a right of way dispute is facing a ‘lengthy’ jail term after also being found guilty of a similar attack 11 months later.

In the first incident, which took place on September 2, 2013, 49-year-old Graeme Brankin cycled after his 70-year-old victim for around a mile after the two had argued over who had right of way in the city’s High Street.

When the man became aware that he was being followed and stopped, Brankin hit him so hard that his glasses and hearing aid fell off. Brankin cycled off and the man, a retired artist, was left with a fractured eye socket and cheekbone, which required an operation to insert three metal plates into his face.

On August 9, 2014, Brankin carried out a similar attack at the pavement entrance to Claypotts Park on Arbroath Road. A witness described how ‘super angry’ Brankin screamed at the man, rested his bike against a wall and then punched him in the face. As the man fell, Brankin struck him twice more before cycling off.

The witness moved the unconscious, blood-covered victim into the recovery position, fearing he would choke and he was later taken to Ninewells Hospital.

Following a three-day trial at Dundee Sheriff Court, Brankin was found unanimously guilty of both attacks.

Sheriff George Way deferred sentence until February 20 to allow time for criminal justice social work background reports.

In December 2013, a man who asked a fellow cyclist not to ride on the pavement spoke of how he was pushed against a wall and then had his head banged against a set of railings. However, on this occasion the assailant made off after the victim said he would call the police.

Alex has written for more cricket publications than the rest of the road.cc team combined. Despite the apparent evidence of this picture, he doesn't especially like cake.

Add new comment

19 comments

Avatar
3wheelsgood | 9 years ago
0 likes

A violent, arrogant, cowardly bully viciously attacks an elderly man and is defined as a ''cyclist''? I think the journo may have a distorted view of this individuals finer qualities in their sadly cynical attempt at sensationalism in the headline.
More to the point - why the delay in sentencing? This vile excrescent excuse for a human being should not be permitted to roam freely with the opportunity to inflict his appalling communication skills on the vulnerable.

Avatar
FluffyKittenofT... | 9 years ago
0 likes

Well if I had to choose a narrow definition I'd define 'cyclist' as anyone who uses a bike as their primary means of practical transportation. Being into cycling as a sport just means you are into sport, which isn't the same thing.

But I don't see the point of such a narrow definition anyway, especially as even sporty cyclists tend to use the public roads.

And surely the point of this story is less that the puncher was on a bike, than that the punched was on one?

Avatar
levermonkey | 9 years ago
0 likes

KiwiMike said: "I said nowt regarding age, beauty or svelticity. Have you *seen* some of the recent shots?"

Oh! Yes you did.

KiwiMike said: "Pretty much every picture of a person on Road.CC on a bike includes lycra and a BMI under 20*. That, by definition, immediately rules out 99% of the UK, let alone the world who use bikes / are 'cyclists'."

Oops!  4

Avatar
KiwiMike replied to levermonkey | 9 years ago
0 likes
levermonkey wrote:

KiwiMike said: "I said nowt regarding age, beauty or svelticity. Have you *seen* some of the recent shots?"

Oh! Yes you did.

KiwiMike said: "Pretty much every picture of a person on Road.CC on a bike includes lycra and a BMI under 20*. That, by definition, immediately rules out 99% of the UK, let alone the world who use bikes / are 'cyclists'."

Oops!  4

Where in my statement do I mention age or looks?

svelte: Adjective (comparative svelter, superlative sveltest)

Attractively thin; gracefully slender.
Refined, delicate.

None of those definitions apply to blokes wearing bib shorts. Unless you're Mr F. Cancellara. I asked the missus.

And to stick to the obvious point instead of wandering off down imagined paths of exclusion, I maintain that the subsets of 'wears lycra' and 'has BMI under 20' do absolutely define well under 1% of the UK population.

The point being not to say anyone outside that group is 'bad' or whatever - far from it. Just that they are highly unlikely to find Road.CC worthy of patronage, given its (perfectly sensible) focus on riding (relative to what lurks in 99% of UK sheds) expensive bikes, (relative to how 99% of the UK could/would ride a bike) fast.

Of course there will be Road.CC readers who don't fit that particular demographic - maybe they ride only in Tweed*, less than 10MPH*, or do not fit the Italian sizing stereotype*. That's not to say they want to read about criminals who happen to ride bikes (probably BSO's to boot).

*** I fit two of these definitions depending on weather/objective, and one constantly.

Avatar
pakennedy | 9 years ago
0 likes

Apparently I'm no longer a cyclist then. Neither of my bikes have narrow wheels and I don't compete in anything. My mountain bike only gets used for going cross country these days where the worst treatment it gets is a bit of a pounding through hills and getting chucked over stiles. The bike that I stay (mostly) on the roads with only does a few hundred miles a month according to the app tracking me.

I own no lycra. Damn. I'll just scrap them and buy a car.

Avatar
brooksby replied to pakennedy | 9 years ago
0 likes
pakennedy wrote:

Apparently I'm no longer a cyclist then. Neither of my bikes have narrow wheels and I don't compete in anything. My mountain bike only gets used for going cross country these days where the worst treatment it gets is a bit of a pounding through hills and getting chucked over stiles. The bike that I stay (mostly) on the roads with only does a few hundred miles a month according to the app tracking me.

I own no lycra. Damn. I'll just scrap them and buy a car.

Me too. Never ride competitively (or even, sportive). Never wear lycra skin suits or aerodynamic helmets. My one (yes, one!) bike is a hybrid with mudguards and panniers. But apparently I'm not a cyclist so should please shuffle off and patronise another website.

Can't we all just get along?

Avatar
fast as fupp | 9 years ago
0 likes

so by this logic anyone who commits a crime whilst wearing training shoes and/or a tracksuit etc should be referred to as an 'athlete'?

Avatar
pakennedy replied to fast as fupp | 9 years ago
0 likes
fast as fupp wrote:

so by this logic anyone who commits a crime whilst wearing training shoes and/or a tracksuit etc should be referred to as an 'athlete'?

Victims are also athletes, of course, if they are wearing trainers. They may be 'amateur' or 'failed' athletes if they didn't manage to run away fast enough.

Avatar
darrenleroy | 9 years ago
0 likes

Cycling enthusiasts? i.e. those who are enthused by things bike related.

Avatar
levermonkey | 9 years ago
0 likes

KiwiMike

Just out of interest but just for a bit of fun - What are you going to call all those 'cyclists' who are not now 'cyclists'?  4

Oh! Your response did raise one question. If you look at a clothing catalogue, all the clothes are modelled by young, attractive, slim and svelte people. Does this mean that us 'uglies' are not allowed to be interested. Just asking.  19

Avatar
KiwiMike replied to levermonkey | 9 years ago
0 likes
levermonkey wrote:

KiwiMike

Just out of interest but just for a bit of fun - What are you going to call all those 'cyclists' who are not now 'cyclists'?  4

Oh! Your response did raise one question. If you look at a clothing catalogue, all the clothes are modelled by young, attractive, slim and svelte people. Does this mean that us 'uglies' are not allowed to be interested. Just asking.  19

A1: Cyclists. Just not the sort of Cyclists interested in the schizzle discussed hereon. That's a special* kind of Cyclist.

A2: See disclaimer at bottom of previous post. I said nowt regarding age, beauty or svelticity. Have you *seen* some of the recent shots?  3

* Meaning 'different'. Not special meaning 'gets to jump queue at café' or 'should not be approached'.

Avatar
KiwiMike | 9 years ago
0 likes

@ Beefy, Levermonkey: Sorry, I'll try to clarify.

Yes, the whole of humanity can and should ride a bicycle.

By your logic, Road.CC should attempt to be relevant to the whole of humanity. It's not. If it was it would be useless for the current target audience, as it would then have to encompass things of interest to the whole of humanity and the fruity stuff about new 105 or discs or reflective materials or whatever would be drowned in the dross of an all-encompassing oeuvre.

You could also find yourself excluding a lot of children, mountain bikers, buycyclists and utility cyclists.

Damn straight. If I want to read about MTB (which I do) I go elsewhere to a specialist MTB site. Ditto kids cycling, and for maintenance tips on our small fleet of Dutch utility bikes.

Road.CC is specifically focused on what most would consider high-end, competitive or endurance cycling, bikes and accessories. Pretty much every picture of a person on Road.CC on a bike includes lycra and a BMI under 20*. That, by definition, immediately rules out 99% of the UK, let alone the world who use bikes / are 'cyclists'. I have friends who cycle every day. They would find Road.CC utterly irrelevant to their 'cycling'. They certainly don't consider themselves 'cyclists' in the UK context (For the Dutch you might as well be called a 'toaster owner', but that's a different pannier of stroopwafel.).

This is not about snobbery, or claiming more right to the term 'cyclist' or to the road, or anything. It's about preserving the relevance of this website to its community. And some thug who happens to use a bike in the course of his crimes is simply not relevant and adds *zero* value to the lives of readers.

What, exactly, am I supposed to DO with this article's information? I can't buy it, or think about booking a holiday there, or decide to shop there or elsewhere. There's no call to action to petition my council, or MP. I can't donate to it. I can't express an opinion saying when I had one back in the day they lasted longer/were lighter/heavier/itchier/shinier.

No-one ever asked to read dross like this. No-one would ask to read more of it. Given the option would you like more crime reporting or more insight into tuning rear mechs, likely developments in tubeless, developments in water/windproof fabrics etc etc etc...there's a bajillion genuinely cycling-related topics that should be investigated/reported ahead of some bloke punching people then riding off on a bike.

aaaaand breathe...

* Guess. But you get the point.

Avatar
brooksby replied to KiwiMike | 9 years ago
0 likes
KiwiMike wrote:

Road.CC is specifically focused on what most would consider high-end, competitive or endurance cycling, bikes and accessories.

Is it? I thought it was a news site for cycling-related news items. Obviously, I was wrong, and need to take my hybrid and panniers elsewhere...

Avatar
Beefy | 9 years ago
0 likes

I think a cyclist is anyone on a bicycle, kinda like a driver is any one in a car? I think mtb,Brompton, riders and even poor people God piity them who can't afford anything other than a tesco, asda, ect bike are cyclists. I nod and say hi as I pass them all regardless of there bike as do my club mates.

We can't accept nice people as cyclists but say no your not a cyclist because you a knob. I'm ashamed this idiot is a cyclist though hope he meets a nice big boyfriend who looks after him in prison.  21

Avatar
KiwiMike | 9 years ago
1 like

Any chance Road.CC can please define 'cyclist', which should then remove the necessity to print articles like this?

Here's a starter for 10:

Anyone on a bike with 700c or 650b tyres narrower than 30mm
Anyone on a dedicated CX bike, who uses it off-road
Anyone who cycles on the road, velodrome or CX track for competitive purposes
Anyone involved in campaigning for improved cycling facilities

Basically, I want to see a definition that removes 'Anyone on a bike because they weren't in a car or walking at the time'. I'm sure the above definition won't be perfect, but it should exclude thugs like the above bloke, and the many other petty or serious criminals Road.CC has considered newsworthy over the years, the ONLY similarity with the site readership being the functionality of the two spinny things and saddle under their arse. If it's not immediately clear that the person concerned was actually a 'cyclist' as we'd define it, then assume they were simply 'a person on a bike at the time' and move on.

I'm sure Runner's World don't publish articles about criminals, based purely on the fact the person 'ran off' using their 'feet'.

A common urban design definition of 'a bicycle' is 'faster shoes'. I agree with this. My Dutch bike is exactly that - I don't change a single thing between stepping out of the house on foot or on that bike, I just get there faster. However when Road.CC use this definition to define what the community might consider worthy of a click and a read it does us all a major disservice. Please, please stop it. Let's make 2015 the year Road.CC focuses on the community it serves and what might interest them, not on bringing us down with irrelevant, negative stories.

Road.CC doesn't review Tesco's MTB/BSO range. Why? The target audience couldn't care less about them. Please get the message guys: WE DON'T CARE about some yob punching someone else, who simply happened to be on a bike at the time. Be selective. Don't waste your time on this crap. Please.

Avatar
levermonkey replied to KiwiMike | 9 years ago
0 likes
KiwiMike wrote:

Any chance Road.CC can please define 'cyclist', which should then remove the necessity to print articles like this?
Here's a starter for 10:
Anyone on a bike with 700c or 650b tyres narrower than 30mm
Anyone on a dedicated CX bike, who uses it off-road
Anyone who cycles on the road, velodrome or CX track for competitive purposes
Anyone involved in campaigning for improved cycling facilities

Although I sympathise with your position I must agree with you that your definition is not perfect because if you use this narrow definition then someone who just wants to ride their bike for the sheer joy and love of cycling could find themselves regarded as a non-cyclist. You could also find yourself excluding a lot of children, mountain bikers, buycyclists and utility cyclists.

Not all cyclists are saints, in any group you will find dickheads. Should road.cc report these stories? Yes, part of the appeal of road.cc is the fact it does cover more than just competitive cycling. It is unfortunate that just because a miscreant uses or escapes by cycle then the story is always "Cyclist..." or "...by cyclist" but that is something we will just have to try and change over time.
[Part of me is now plotting how to get miscreants-in-trainers stories reported as "Runner..." or "...by athlete".]

A cyclist is a cyclist, is a cyclist. We can't pick and choose.

n.b. For those who have never come across the term buycyclist before and are curious then please click the link below.
http://www.systemcomic.com/2013/05/03/the-system-643-buycycling/

Avatar
Kadinkski | 9 years ago
0 likes

Imagine the damage that angry freak could do in a car....probably lost his license a long time ago.

Avatar
mad_scot_rider | 9 years ago
0 likes

I hope a wee while in pokey will help him calm the f**k down!

Avatar
jacknorell replied to mad_scot_rider | 9 years ago
0 likes
mad_scot_rider wrote:

I hope a wee while in pokey will help him calm the f**k down!

Or that he inevitably upsets someone and gets the kicking he so rightly deserves.

Latest Comments