Police Community Support Officers may not get the power to issue fixed penalty notices to cyclists without pedal reflectors after the House of Lords last night voted to amend the Government’s Anti Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Bill.
The bill would extend to PCSOs the current power of police officers to stop cyclists who don’t have reflectors on their bikes.
However, that’s an almost incidental provision of a bill that is coming under flak for criminalising making a nuisance of yourself.
Even the Conservative Home website has criticised the bill, which seeks to replace ASBOs with the much broader IPNAs (Injunctions to Prevent Nuisance and Annoyance), calling it “dangerous and poorly worded”.
Civil libertarians fear that the provision could be used against many kinds of political speech and protest. The political abuse of the extension of powers to PCSOs also worries the CTC.
The CTC’s Campaigns and Policy Director Roger Geffen yesterday told road.cc: “The risk is that this power simply gets used when a local police force decides to have a politically-motivated crack-down on cyclists: stop them, fine them for anything you spot that they are doing wrong, then tell the local media that you’re clamping down on unsafe cyclist behaviour.
“That risk isn’t limited to the issue of reflectors – it relates to all the powers that this Bill is now proposing to give to PCSOs.”
But while Lord Berkeley was planning yesterday to table an amendment specifically addressing the powers of PCSOs over reflectors, it was an amendment proposed by crossbencher Lord Dear that puts the bill’s future into question.
Lord Dear said the new power “risks being used for those who seek to protest peacefully, noisy children in the street, street preachers, canvassers, carol singers, trick-or-treaters, church bell ringers, clay pigeon shooters, nudists. This is a crowded island that we live in and we must exercise a degree surely of tolerance and forbearance.”
Peers backed Lord Dear’s amendment to replace the phrase "nuisance and annoyance" in the legislation with "harassment, alarm or distress". That’s the behaviour that can trigger an ASBO, making the difference between an ASBO and an IPNA small enough the Government may decide not to take the bill any further.
Further discussion of the bill has been scheduled for next Tuesday, when it's believed the specific issue of PCSO powers and reflectors will be debated.
Yeah I think that's about right....
^^Yes, all of this.^^...
Thanks. I have never had problems with wiggle, as it's big enough to have a base in europe which greatly simplifies things. I was wondering about...
General thought... if the local forces put such ridiculosly limiting criteria in place, why bother with a camera at all? It just brings additional...
I'm a 100% sprinter 😉
Crikey that rear derailleur looks so close to the ground. So odd looking. Good job it only costs £30, It looks like you''ll easilly catch it on a...
The problem for the Ukrainians is that having decided they didn't want to let the Russians run the place, steal their resources and kill them...
BMW on BMW - genuinely surprised that the police swung into action here...
I'm pleased you've noted this. I've missed the importance of this in the past. That said, living in a city I've yet to find anywhere without...
A few years ago I was visiting a garment factory in Tunisia for my job....