- News
- Live blog

“Daily threat to me is two-wheeled”: Pedestrians being “terrorised” by “arrogantly dangerous cyclist idiots”, says Lib Dem peer – after claiming “there is no culture war against cycling”; Five star reviews for Vuelta’s hail hotel + more on the live blog
SUMMARY

“Daily threat to me is two-wheeled”: Pedestrians being “terrorised” by “arrogantly dangerous cyclist idiots”, says Lib Dem peer – after claiming “there is no culture war against cycling” in response to viral floating bus stop clip
A Liberal Democrat peer says there is “outrage and anger” that pedestrians are being “terrorised” by “arrogantly dangerous cyclist idiots” on a daily basis – but insists there is “no culture war against cycling”, as social media users accused the former MEP of using Reform-style language against people on bikes.
Sarah Ludford (that’s Baroness Ludford to you) made the comments as part of a debate on X over a clip showing cyclists riding through a floating bus stop in London.
The video was initially posted on the social media platform over a year ago, but was reshared last week by the National Federation of the Blind of the UK, going viral in the process and racking up over 13 million views.
.@cityoflondon these floating are not safe or accessible for blind people… pic.twitter.com/GueglZkF25
— NFBUK (@NFBUK) August 18, 2026
Responding to the video, the pro-active travel page Bob from Accounts wrote: “You will never guess what Floating Bus Stops are called in Europe: Bus Stops. They work fine everywhere else; the real danger is cars. Here in the UK, we have a culture-war bias against people who cycle.”
Baroness Ludford, however, wasn’t having any of that.
“There is no ‘culture war’ against cycling,” she wrote.
“There is outrage and anger that pedestrians are being terrorised on pavements and road crossings, with disabled people trapped at home too frightened to go out, by arrogantly dangerous cyclist idiots. Where’s the social justice in that?”

Ludford, a former Islington councillor, was made a life peer in 1997, before being elected as a Liberal Democrat MEP for London in 1999. During her time in Brussels, she criticised the European Commission’s decision to shelve a proposal on HGV blind spot cameras, after a cyclist was killed by a lorry driver in the capital.
However, her current stance on cycling has attracted criticism from cyclists on social media, who accused her of stealing Reform’s pro-motoring clothes.
“If you were Reform, I’d get your tone and language,” West Yorkshire Cycling said. “If MPs don’t want to be abused, then perhaps you shouldn’t lump all cyclists in with the ‘arrogantly dangerous cycling idiots’.
“If you want people to stop at these crossings, why not spend your time asking for the Highway Code to be updated? The Highway Code claims zebra crossings have flashing beacons.”

In response to West Yorkshire Cycling’s complaints, Ludford said: “I am not an MP. I did not do that. For others knocking me who have failed to read my other replies: I have commented on my experience as a non-driving pedestrian; thoroughly aware of the huge danger of cars and lorries, but the daily threat to me is two-wheeled.”
“You used language your party would be appalled by if a Tory or Reform had used those same words,” the cyclist replied.
After another X user accused her of “stoking a culture war against cyclists”, linking anti-cycling rhetoric to the fatal assault in Leicester this week, Ludford said: “Your slurs are tedious, untrue, and completely unjustified.
“My work on cyclist safety as an MEP is easily findable by googling… Maybe stop the defensiveness and accept that some criticism of modern cyclists’ behaviour is valid.”
“Towel service provided two minutes after 180 cyclists came unannounced”: Vuelta peloton dishes out glowing five star reviews to hotel that provided shelter after horrendous stage-cancelling hailstorm
’Twas in another grand tour, one of toil and blood
I was buried in the hail and the road was full of mud
I came in from the wilderness, a racer void of form
“Come in,” she said, “I’ll give you shelter from the storm”…
(I’ve been told I’m not allowed to do the whole song, but I reckon the ‘In a world of marginal gains and men who are fighting to be warm’ is a goer. Ah, well.)

Yesterday’s hail-induced cancellation at the Vuelta a España did at least result in two positive outcomes: a gallery of brilliant photos and some unexpected five-star reviews for a local hotel.
Stage three of this year’s Vuelta, in case you missed it, was brought to a grinding halt around 15km from the finish in Font-Romeu as large chunks of hail battered the peloton, some of whom, including Felix Gall, had already ducked for cover in a handily located hotel near the top of the Col de Mont-Louis.
As word filtered through that the stage had been suspended, red jersey Tadej Pogačar carried out his patron duties and waved the group to a halt. The rest of the peloton soon joined their colleagues in the old-school environs of the IGESA Village Club Mont-Louis Les Sorbiers, where they were quickly informed that the stage had been abandoned altogether.
The sight of a full grand tour peloton, soaked to the skin and shivering, inside the IGESA Village Club – as some hotel guests looked warily on – invariably resulted, in my opinion, in some of the best photographs of the entire season.
Come on, these two are practically renaissance paintings:


Majestic. Though, I have to say, my personal favourite is of Wout van Aert – who initially sheltered in a roadside van before making his way to the hotel – standing in the lobby as an older couple sit at the side, disapprovingly glaring at these bloomin’ bike riders who’ve interrupted their lovely afternoon in the Pyrenees:

I reckon the IGESA Village Club – whose staff were quick to dish out towels and hot drinks to keep the riders warm – won’t be too displeased with the disturbance, the hotel’s Google reviews piling up glowing five star references in the aftermath of yesterday’s stage.
“Warm and welcoming reception area with friendly staff, and a nice place to be able to shelter from any inclement weather in the area,” the Picnic PostNL team posted yesterday.

“Perfect location in hailstorms, and even towel service provided two minutes after 180 cyclists came unannounced. They deserve every star they can get!” added Uno-X’s Tobias Johannessen.
An account claiming to be Urška Žigart’s boyfriend even got in on the act, but I think we’ll need verification on that one.
It wasn’t long, however, before the peloton’s resident hotel reviewer, Magnus Cort, chipped in, with a rare seven out of seven review from the moustachioed accommodation expert:

The place will be booked up until 2030 at this rate.
Help us to bring you the best cycling content
If you’ve enjoyed this article, then please consider subscribing to road.cc from as little as £2.49. Our mission is to bring you all the news that’s relevant to you as a cyclist, independent reviews, impartial buying advice and more. Your subscription will help us to do more.
3 Comments
Read more...
Read more...
Read more...
Latest Comments
It's poor that so many people are ignoring the crossing, and frustrating and inconvenient for the pedestrians. That said, though, in all those clips I only see two incidents where a pedestrian was arguably 'endangered' (plus two more where someone ran into the back of someone else who'd stopped for the crossing, and an unexplained and seemingly unrelated Lime bike coming-together).
@lesterama In most cases - whether you like it or not - the cyclists are not to blame. Floating bus stops, courtesy crossings (like you see in supermarket car parks etc) are NOT zebra crossings. They are often hard to see until you are up close in many cases. This is quite clearly a very busy thoroughfare and as such its a failure of the council to put in suitable infrastructure. A lot of these are not given much thought process as to how it will impact people moving in all directions no matter their mode of travel. Its so easy to blame the cyclists but they didnt install the crossing. If this were a proper Zebra (or even a pelican crossing) it would be much more suitable in this situation. I tire of cyclists being to blame for poorly designed roads and paths. The ones who created this problem should receive the ire of the public.
Shocking behaviour by so many people on bikes in that vid. Unshocking behaviour by someone in power lumping all cyclists together.
Fair take on the Erola Jons controversy from Orla Chennaoui: "It’s too easy to blame the woman. It’s what we always do. But if the Vuelta is going to bring an influencer who has built a huge following with her brand of flirty interactions, is it her fault if that’s what she brings to the job? Or is it bad branding which is someone else’s call entirely? Just be careful about ripping a young woman to shreds. She doesn’t deserve that."
I'm a french resident. Please could you tell me where to find the silky smooth bike paths and the considerate drivers. And those signs which you saw (chausée déformée) have probably been there for years.
@Bungle_52 If he broke the NZ equivalent of GDPR rules that would be a very different matter, but the report here implies that he was originally investigated for the CCTV matter but sacked for the comment. You'll notice above that nowhere have I condoned or excused the "joke", I simply said that I don't think it's sufficient grounds for someone to be sacked. How many of us can say that we've never said something like, for example, on being overtaken on a blind brow, "Shame there wasn't a truck coming, that might have taught the bugger some sense" or similar? Would that warrant dismissal from your job if someone heard you say that at work?
@Rendel Harris wrote That may be the case but if management are "out to get you" you would be well advised to watch your step and stay well within the rules. In my opinion there is no excuse for this person's comment to impressionable youngsters. To condone this is akin to supporting the likes of Messrs Clarkson, Liddle and Parris. "Well it was only a joke." The other point made in the article is that he showed the cctv footage without obtaining authorisation and if GDPR in NZ is anything like here you need to be very careful in this respect.
@Xenophon2 I agree. I tried a different route from Garstang to Leeds on Saturday to avoid the Death Highways from Barnoldswick to Skipton. I had to turn off Hazard warnings on the 1040 because people have ruined the hazard facility by warning about every pothole, instead of only the bad ones. UK roads are full of them, and the red Hazard was turning up constantly. Similarly, radar is useless in the UK because nutter drivers are everywhere and the alarm will be going off all the time. I'm convinced this is a good radar and it's what I'd get if I had any use for it. I'm pretty sure it would have warned me about this Stagecoach bus on The Lancashire Terminator Express, and lots of the other vehicles as well- then what? ttps://upride.cc/incident/px12dnv_stagecoach41_closepass/
It's just the same on cucumber growers websites. Only last week, a Tuesday I think it was, there was an article on growing courgettes. I don't grow courgettes. I was livid and thought I was going to spontaneously combust. Luckily my wife knows the signs - steam rising from my boots, speaking in tongues- and was on hand to throw a bucket of water over me. She always seems to have a bucket of water handy. And as for red tomato growers websites? Don't get me started.
What size of golf balls though?
3 thoughts on ““Daily threat to me is two-wheeled”: Pedestrians being “terrorised” by “arrogantly dangerous cyclist idiots”, says Lib Dem peer – after claiming “there is no culture war against cycling”; Five star reviews for Vuelta’s hail hotel + more on the live blog”
Shocking behaviour by so many people on bikes in that vid.
Unshocking behaviour by someone in power lumping all cyclists together.
@lesterama In most cases – whether you like it or not – the cyclists are not to blame. Floating bus stops, courtesy crossings (like you see in supermarket car parks etc) are NOT zebra crossings. They are often hard to see until you are up close in many cases.
This is quite clearly a very busy thoroughfare and as such its a failure of the council to put in suitable infrastructure. A lot of these are not given much thought process as to how it will impact people moving in all directions no matter their mode of travel. Its so easy to blame the cyclists but they didnt install the crossing. If this were a proper Zebra (or even a pelican crossing) it would be much more suitable in this situation.
I tire of cyclists being to blame for poorly designed roads and paths. The ones who created this problem should receive the ire of the public.
It’s poor that so many people are ignoring the crossing, and frustrating and inconvenient for the pedestrians. That said, though, in all those clips I only see two incidents where a pedestrian was arguably ‘endangered’ (plus two more where someone ran into the back of someone else who’d stopped for the crossing, and an unexplained and seemingly unrelated Lime bike coming-together).