Brighton and Hove City Council have come under fire from a number of cyclists for a safety poster intended to highlight the dangers of wearing headphones while cycling. Featuring a man riding with headphones on, it reads: “Headphones can prevent you from hearing traffic. Share the road, share the responsibility.”
A number of cyclists have been critical of the message and an adapted version has appeared on social media reading: “There’s no evidence wearing headphones is hazardous but we’re blaming cyclists anyway. Share the roads, take all the blame.”
Councillor Gill Mitchell, chair of the environment, transport and sustainability committee, defended the poster. She told The Argus that it was part of a larger campaign focusing on the dangers of distraction.
“The council’s road safety awareness campaign is aimed at motorists, cyclists and pedestrians, with six different posters carrying messages about the dangers of distraction from headphones, mobile phones and other devices.
“The campaign was launched following road traffic collision statistics for Brighton and Hove over the last three years which show that failing to look properly is by far the biggest contributory factor. As a new administration, we are committed to improving road safety in the city for all road users and will be looking at new and innovative ways to refresh our road safety campaigns and messages.”
However, Mark Strong, a local cyclist and transport consultant with Transport Initiatives, feels that this approach fails to acknowledge deeper problems on the roads.
“There is a huge imbalance in the level of responsibility which is not shown in the original poster. It looks great but whether it would make any difference to the actual numbers of people getting hurt is debatable.
“All accidents have more than one cause and a poster essentially saying ‘don’t be stupid’ won’t get very far. There needs to be forgiveness in the road environment. The system should be able to cope with that and should not be so on the edge that any mistake can lead to an accident.”
In 2013, London Mayor Boris Johnson said that he would not be against a headphone ban for cyclists while more recently Lord Scott of Foscote called for a ban on cyclists using ‘earplugs’, arguing that “a cyclist’s main protection should be his or her own eyes and ears.”
A 2014 BBC survey found that nine out of ten people were in favour of a headphone ban. However, there has not been much research into the effect of headphones on the safety of cyclists. In one example, research published in 2011 in the journal Transportation Research by academics from the University of Groningen found that ‘very large’ negative effects were found when in-earbuds were used, but that no negative effects were found when listening to music using only one earbud.





















51 thoughts on “Council criticised for ‘headphones can prevent you from hearing the traffic’ poster aimed at cyclists”
Sometimes depending on the
Sometimes depending on the wind direction and your own speed you don’t hear cars until the last moment, that’s not wearing headphones. I’d prefer to have my wits about me, it’s difficult to say… “There’s no evidence wearing headphones is hazardous” when you’re dead. 😕
This subject has been done to
This subject has been done to death on here, personally I agree with the posters.
I do sometimes use headphones when off-road, but never in traffic.
Problem with posters like
Problem with posters like this is that they ingrain in peoples’ subconscious that if you’re driving and you see someone in front of you who is riding and wearing headphones that it becomes ok to drive too close, to honk at them, or cut them off because in some way “its their fault”
Hmmm. Motorcyclists wear
Hmmm. Motorcyclists wear earplugs to protect their hearing – are we to vilify that practice too?
How about we start, as a society, by stopping the dangerous and illegal driving that occurs every day on almost every road? Then we could remove those vehicles that have inherent and dangerous blind spots and replace them with ones that work just as well but have much better visibility. Then we could take the incompetent drivers off the road by retesting regularly. If there are still significant cyclist deaths once those measures have been taken, perhaps *then* we could start to attack cyclists for wearing headphones. Oh, and ban the deaf from cycling.
adamthekiwi wrote:Hmmm.
I have custom made earplugs for use on the motorbike – even with them I have creeping hearing loss and tinnitus, mostly because wind noise on the motorbike. I will certainly continue to wear them and would buy better insulation if I could find it.
My car has double-glazed windows. That feature is one of the reasons I choose that particular car as long journeys in cars increases my tinnitus. Again, I would readily buy a car with better insulation if I find one.
All of this will have to be banned if we are to ban earphones from cyclists.
I’d be interested to know:
1)
I’d be interested to know:
1) How many cyclists wearing headphones are killed annually whilst wearing headphones?
2) Out of these cyclists how many were at fault in the accident?
3) Out of the ones at fault, how many of the accidents were caused as a direct result of not being able to hear the hazard that killed them?
4) Out of these that couldn’t hear, how many would have heard the hazard and had time to appropriately respond if they weren’t wearing headphones?
I’d imagine we have some pretty low numbers that fit all criteria – a campaign aimed at drivers encouraging them to safely pass cyclists would be more appropriate.
As southseabythesea correctly stated, with the wind rushing by your ears you often don’t hear traffic sneak up on you. The shoulder-check is the lifesaver. Why aren’t cars/lorries/taxis etc not targeted for using music systems?
Great quotes from Mark
Great quotes from Mark Strong.
I don’t ever wear headphones, but I don’t understand how they would compromise my safety. Does the car coming from behind that is about to hit me sound different?
cat1commuter wrote:Does the
What a fantastic point – I might use that one whenever this debate comes up with friends.
dunno, but i do know that if
dunno, but i do know that if i’m approaching a crossroad the fact i can HEAR traffic approaching sure does help.
but you know better obviously.
cat1commuter wrote:Great
Or the driver pulling out of the side road who’s not looking properly?
Or the lorry that overtakes you with oncoming traffic so cuts back in early? (as happened to me 3 times recently. Yesterday I had to nip onto the kerb, and I wasn’t even wearing headphones)
The council is just victim-blaming, I’m afraid, because it’s a hell of a lot easier than addressing those responsible for the vast majority of deaths and injuries on the road.
While cycling is a minority activity, conducted only by mamils and people too poor to buy a car, then this mindset will prevail. But it can change.
try riding with them and then
try riding with them and then come back with your thoughts. I’ve tried it and I found I really noticed the loss of one of my senses.
Personally IMHO I think
Personally IMHO I think anyone who wears headphones or earphones whilst out on the street or public highway is asking for trouble. This includes pedestrians, runners, cyclists and motorists. These people all come under the heading Dickheads !
Batchy wrote:Personally IMHO
So presumably you think deaf people are also ‘dickheads’?
pamplemoose wrote:Batchy
Would deaf people be wearing headphones? #justsaying
southseabythesea
Would deaf people be wearing headphones? #justsaying— Batchy
Just to say that deaf or hard of hearing people wear hearing aids That includes me!
I need hearing aids to help me deal with every day experiences including keeping safe whilst out on my bike. Headphones subdue natural senses that are there to keep us safe hearing aids work the opposite way . Smart arse !
Personally I think that all
Personally I think that all road users should be made aware of the dangers of using headphones whilst driving, cycling or even crossing the road.
When I’m cycling one of my best defences is a good shout and if a driver is wearing headphones (and some do) he/she will be unaware of peripheral noises made by other traffic in a way that he/she won’t be if the in car stereo is on.
It’s actually illegal to wear
It’s actually illegal to wear headphones whilst driving. I got pulled over for it in my teens while driving my parent’s Morris Minor which didn’t have a radio.
onlinejones wrote:Personally
Wearing a pair of headphones while driving a car on the road has been illegal for decades, but wearing specifically an earphone on one side is not.
It is only a matter of time before someone uses this as the basis for making bicycle headphones (both sides) illegal.
I am patiently awaiting the moment when someone brings into the argument the fact that it is very, very common for motorcyclists to wear in-ear earplugs (noise reduction ear defenders) under their helmets. Did the council that made this poster not know that?
severs1966 wrote:
I am
I don’t see how ear-plugs used by motorcyclists bear any relevance to the debate over in-ear audio devices.
Ear plugs defend against wind noise at high speed, the effect on ambient noise is pretty minimal.
So no cycling for deaf
So no cycling for deaf people? do the Greens not have something to do with Brighton?
If wearing headphones is so
If wearing headphones is so dangerous because you cannot hear what’s going on around you, then what happens when you are sealed into a metal box with full surround-sound and a Facebook feed?
(Disclaimer: I don’t wear headphones.)
brooksby wrote:If wearing
Because driving a car and riding a bike are exactly the same thing? I know this is a frequent comparison but I think it’s pretty disinegenous. Cars have lots of mirrors but I don’t hear anyone saying that’s a reason that bikes should too.
Same with the ‘deaf people manage’ line. The fact that they do doesn’t change whether it’s a good idea to limit your hearing or not, any more than the fact that blind people manage to walk down the pavement means it doesn’t matter if you walk around with your eyes closed.
Anyway, rant over. I don’t wear headphones personally, and I happen to think that sometimes your hearing can give you useful information about what’s going on out of your field of vision. But each to their own, I can’t say I get particularly upset when I see people using them. And I totally agree that campaigns like this are actually reinforcing misguided notions about who’s actually doing the harm and that’s not helpful at all.
and what about all those cars
and what about all those cars with heavy tinted glasses? We don’t see anything inside, we can’t check if the driver see us. What can they see at night or when it’s cloudy?
Speaking for myself, I can’t understand how you can put earphones when outside, as a pedestrian, a cyclist or worse, a motorist. And frankly, except if they put the volume to the max, what can they hear with all the noise around? People have lost common sense.
I stopped wearing headphones
I stopped wearing headphones not because of an inability to hear, but because a good song often got me too excited and prone to taking risks.
The danger to cyclists from
The danger to cyclists from motorised road users is perhaps so great that only by not wearing headphones can we properly hear aggressive drivers revving their engines preparing to make dangerous passing manoeuvers, and thus take evasive action before we are mown down.
It is for our own safety, but it really shouldn’t be necessary.
I don’t wear heardphones but,
I don’t wear heardphones but, perhaps my ears don’t work as well as the author of this poster because I don’t think Would be able to tell the difference between the sound of an HGV about to pass 3inchs from my elbow (as per f#cking usual) or one that’s going to hit me. I trust my eyes not my hears.
obviously I cant speak for
obviously I cant speak for anyone else, and maybe my hearing is completely shoot to bits, but when Im cycling on the road and especially on built up city roads as it echoes and amplifies off the buildings, I cant hear anything but the noise of my pedalling, the wind and just a general thrum of engines & road background noise.
I cant pinpoint accurately where any individual engine noise was coming from on my bike,its why I always shoulder check because I cant tell if the engine noise is directly behind me, coming towards me,from the car on the opposite side of the road trying to pull out. and thats before you drop aload of road works drilling or digging noise, HGVs, air ambulances, emergency vehicles, buses, pedestrians, loud stereos in cars.
which is why when people do that shouty abuse thing at you from moving cars, its completely pointless, because I havent a clue what any of them are saying.
but there you go, when we all have electric cars there wont be a problem will there 😕
In my London commuting
In my London commuting experience, cyclists (and peds) wearing headphones are a danger to other cyclists so for that reason alone I’d be in favour of a ban, but it’ll never happen.
Also, a headphone-wearing cyclist involved in an accident will more likely have a more difficult time dealing with a claim against an insurer who’ll use the argument that said cyclist is partially to blame for the accident.
Just back from a ride where I
Just back from a ride where I wore EarPods all the way round listening to the test match. Can not see a problem, can hear cars behind, it focuses my mind and is no problem at all.
If using those noise reduction ones there could be a problem though if you cycle wearing those monstrosities I have no sympathy for you !
I have been cycling for 4
I have been cycling for 4 years as a start for fitness, then moved to mtb and now a road cyclist. I wear headphones, currently have wireless ones that Bluetooth to my phone.
I have the sound on low enough to hear traffic coming from all directions, I can hear them easily enough but I have the sound on loud enough to hear the music.
Personally it’s down to that persons balance towards safety and enjoying music whilst cycling. It’s about looking before changing direction & having a 360 degree knowledge of what’s around you. This is whether you are wearing headphones or not, you NEED to know what’s going on around you.
In the 2 years I’ve now gone to full road cycling I have never had an accident or near miss with any other traffic on the road whilst wearing headphones. I base that down to be responsible and having A knowledge of the traffic I’m sharing on the road. Only my personal opinion.
If distraction is their issue
If distraction is their issue then presumably they’ll be doing a poster asking drivers to turn stereos off. Because they’re distracting. Right? I mean, that would be oh never mind.
Bez wrote:If distraction is
don’t talk sensible stuff now … and those drivers who have their phones on loud whilst driving …
Don’t wear any whilst on the
Don’t wear any whilst on the road bike but wear an earbud on the left side whilst Mountain Biking. I can hear traffic and road noise on the important side.
I’ve seen car drivers wearing
I’ve seen car drivers wearing headphones/earphones, so will they be banned?
Bazza155 wrote:I’ve seen car
It’s actually illegal for drivers to wear headphones in both ears when driving – but not in one ear only for some bizarre reason – but that hasn’t stopped an increasing number of numpties driving round everywhere with their crappy iPhone buds in all the time. And don’t get me started on the pedestrians I have to avoid each morning who are in their little zones, headphones in, heads down, looking at facegram or watching videos (that I really don’t get at all)
Insofar as I’m concerned I don’t see why it’s worth introducing the extra risk by wearing headphones while cycling, or not wearing a helmet. Just because you think you’re safe, doesn’t make you safe.
Jeez, you guys! No one cares
Jeez, you guys! No one cares whether you like headphones or not.
The council should be making better infrastructure, roadways that cope with human error, that’s their job, not name-calling or blaming others.
Not what I would have
Not what I would have identified as a prime cause of cycling related road traffic incidents but it does amaze me that people go out into a dangerous environment and choose to block off a major sense be they in a car, on a bike, or as a pedestrian.
I’ll never wear earphones on
I’ll never wear earphones on the road. Just plain dangerous as you can get into your own world, be at higher risk and also be a danger to others.
All I know is that I have 5 senses, 2 of which are highly utilised for safety. While on the bike I have unimpaired vision and 100% hearing.
You can’t equate removing one of these senses to an increased risk but I like to use all the tools available to me.
The mistake many make in this
The mistake many make in this common debate is to assume earphones ‘block out’ the hearing, it removes one of the senses. It doesn’t need to. You can’t tell and it comes down to common sense of those choosing to listen to music when cycling.
Distraction?
What do they
Distraction?
What do they think about the dangers of distraction from the adverts on roundabouts they allow?
Please sign my petition to eliminate advertising signs on roundabouts
http://preview.tinyurl.com/qcsygbx
‘I’ll never wear earphones on
‘I’ll never wear earphones on the road. Just plain dangerous as you can get into your own world, be at higher risk and also be a danger to others.’
I’ve never ‘got in my own world’, been at higher risk or a danger to others when wearing earphones any more than I have when not wearing them.
If you ride like an idiot, you’ll be an idiot, whether you can hear or not. That’s all it comes down to, in the end.
If your ears work, use
If your ears work, use them.
Twice today I shouted to riders on the road that I was overtaking, both, wearing headphones, moved out on me oblivious, thinking they had the the road to theirselves.
I just can’t see (hear) arguments on this, I have no mirrors and need to know what’s behind me without constantly looking backwards.
Hear a vehicle, stay well out, as you year it start to pass, move in, it increases your clearance.
Makes no odds on motor vehicles,they have mirrors.
I use a earphone in one ear
I use a earphone in one ear so I can hear info from Endomondo or Strava, but no other music etc, I hope this would not be seen as an issue.
‘Twice today I shouted to
‘Twice today I shouted to riders on the road that I was overtaking, both, wearing headphones, moved out on me oblivious, thinking they had the the road to theirselves.’
sounds as though they should have used their *eyes*.
andyp wrote:’Twice today I
They only had eyes on the front unfortunately.
Flying Scot wrote:andyp
They only had eyes on the front unfortunately.— andyp
Yes, this is how most humans are designed.
I’ve never worn headphones as
I’ve never worn headphones as such while cycling, but on a few early hours training rides on quiet roads I’ve used bone conduction headphones with the music relatively low. The advantage is your ear canal is open so you can still hear everything else clearly.
The risk of cars on the road was low at this time and I also often use a small mirror on the near side drop so I can check what is moving up behind easily without moving.
Would I use them on busier roads at busier times, probably not, in a group, no, on cycle paths and parks, doubt it.
Councillor Gill Mitchell of
Councillor Gill Mitchell of the Brighton & Hove council stated “The campaign was launched following road traffic collision statistics for Brighton and Hove over the last three years which show that FAILING TO LOOK PROPERLY is by far the biggest contributory factor.
If failing to LOOK PROPERLY is a major factor in accidents, why are the council wasting money by exhorting cyclists to stop using headphones? Do they think cyclists are so stupid they do not understand the function of headphones and are wearing them over their eyes?
This seems to be a classic case of victim blaming.
This very much sounds like
This very much sounds like another case of people who don’t cycle, and who don’t like people who do cycle very much either, doing a ‘cycle safety’ campaign which is targeted more towards motorists to reassure them that we all know whose fault it is really when drivers run over cyclists, and it’s not that of the person behind the wheel.
I sometimes see riders with headphones in my area and always feel they are missing out on part of the experience of being in the countryside by not being able to hear the sound of the wind, or a curlew, of the beck beside the road but I suppose in Brighton it’s all seagulls and lambrettas they’re blotting out so probably a different situation down there.
Hearing is the primary
Hearing is the primary warning sense, which is why I rely more on loud music with vocals rather than bright light to wake me up when asleep.
Ear plugs are fine so long as they don’t block out the wrong frequencies, but most probably do; headphones and earphones are just nuts, you need both ears to pinpoint direction and distance, especially at partly obscured T or cross junctions without traffic lights.
I have an Air horn on my bicycle mostly for people who’s hearing is naturally or artificially impaired, including inside a car with music playing; I’ve even had to use it on slower cyclists who seemed to be deaf to a bell when I wanted to overtake.
If you need to listen to
If you need to listen to music to enhance your ride, you’re doing it wrong 🙂