John has been writing about bikes and cycling for over 30 years since discovering that people were mug enough to pay him for it rather than expecting him to do an honest day's work.
He was heavily involved in the mountain bike boom of the late 1980s as a racer, team manager and race promoter, and that led to writing for Mountain Biking UK magazine shortly after its inception. He got the gig by phoning up the editor and telling him the magazine was rubbish and he could do better. Rather than telling him to get lost, MBUK editor Tym Manley called John’s bluff and the rest is history.
Since then he has worked on MTB Pro magazine and was editor of Maximum Mountain Bike and Australian Mountain Bike magazines, before switching to the web in 2000 to work for CyclingNews.com. Along with road.cc founder Tony Farrelly, John was on the launch team for BikeRadar.com and subsequently became editor in chief of Future Publishing’s group of cycling magazines and websites, including Cycling Plus, MBUK, What Mountain Bike and Procycling.
John has also written for Cyclist magazine, edited the BikeMagic website and was founding editor of TotalWomensCycling.com before handing over to someone far more representative of the site's main audience.
He joined road.cc in 2013. He lives in Cambridge where the lack of hills is more than made up for by the headwinds.
Add new comment
5 comments
I looked into using one of these for cycling but the lenses arent much good for variety; photochromatic etc...
But they are a good idea for cyclists..I look down at my garmin means I take my eyes off the road.
A helmet mirror can take the eyes off the road just like a google glasses can soo this aint any different - more a HELP than a hindrance.
HUD's are all very well if you've been trained by experts. you're in wide open airspace and not close to other objects with your whirling rotors - but on public roads with no training - and possibly a bowl of cereal in your hands? Noooooooooooo.
It will be interesting. I have seen a motorcycle hemlet with a hud which was translucent which was quite clever, displaying a map and the route you were on. Certainly on some tours such a device would be useful rather than hoping you remember the route or stopping and checking on the map.
I agree with Neil that if there is a crash and a cyclist is wearing one it will be scapegoated. But who knows, there might be some sensible legislation as to where any display appears in the standard FOV.
The Department for Transport says,
"We are aware of the impending rollout of Google Glass and are in discussion with the police to ensure that individuals do not use this technology while driving.”
I can see this technology being used on closed roads, maybe the track too, but this won't be allowed on public roads and lawyers will be quick to point the finger at any cyclist having a crash when wearing such a device.
How would that work with in dash car entertainment systems? They cannot be operated while the vehicle is in motion but they are still visible