The UCI has this evening issued an update on the second meeting of its Athletes' Commission, set up last year and which met this week for its second ever session, held from Monday to Wednesday at the governing body's headquarters in Switzerland.
Given the tumultuous times for the sport, doping-related issues were clearly high on the agenda, ranging from recommending harsher sanctions against rider caught doping, and extending sanctions to teams and riders' entourages.
They also asked the UCI to approach the World Anti-Doping Agency to request it to make its ADAMS Whereabouts software easier to access and use, with athletes in cycling and other sports having criticised the systems inflexibility in the past.
Issues related to working conditions were discussed too - those include increasing minimum salaries, and a salary cap on teams.
The riders, drawn from a range of discplines, both genders and including paracyclists, also called for equal prize money between men's and women's events, and for UCI WorldTour teams to be encouraaged to back women's teams, something only a handful currently do.
The full press release is at the end of this article, and the UCI has also released videos this week of two members of the commission talking about its work - US mountain biker Georgia Gould, and former Team Sky rider, Dario Cioni.
Still an active rider when he was appointed to the commission when it was set up last year, the Reading-born Italian now works as a press officer with the British ProTeam.
Rather improbably, also caught on film is Team Sky's Bernie Eisel talking through the ISO 9000 certification process. Seriously.
Date: 14 November 2012
The UCI Athletes' Commission issues recommendations for the future of cycling
The UCI Athletes’ Commission held a three-day session in Switzerland from Monday to Wednesday to draw up proposals to improve the daily lives of competitive cyclists and enhance the image and operation of the sport.
The members of the Commission, established in 2011, are active athletes who represent all the disciplines of cycling, including para-cycling, with both male and female representatives. The Commission members exchange their ideas without restriction.
The recommendations issued by the Athletes' Commission are directed to all the stakeholders in cycling: the UCI, National Federations, anti-doping organisations, event organisers, professional teams, etc.
After considering the situation of women's cycling, the Athletes' Commission proposed that the prize lists for all women's events should be equivalent to those for men's races, as will shortly be the case for the UCI World Championships.
The members of the Commission want to encourage UCI WorldTour teams to invest in women's squads and the organisers of men's events to also offer races for women, in this way making the women's calendar more global.
The Athletes’ Commission also studied several options to support the battle against doping and improve the image of cycling.
The Commission proposed stiffening the sanctions against riders found guilty of doping in order to have a dissuasive effect. In this respect, the Athletes’ Commission supports the UCI regulations introduced on 1 July 2011 that prohibit any person involved in a doping case from returning to cycling in any post or position of responsibility. Furthermore, the Commission proposed sanctioning the teams and the entourage of riders who test positive and not just the rider him or herself.
In order to fight against the temptation to dope and guarantee all athletes a comfortable standard of living, the Commission recommended that the riders' minimum salary should be increased and a ceiling imposed on teams’ salary budgets in order to reduce the financial differences between leaders and team riders.
The Athletes' Commission emphasised the need to educate young athletes and their team helpers. The Commission supports the training initiatives undertaken in this regard, in particular those held at the World Cycling Centre.
While offering its backing to the fight against doping led by the UCI, the Commission proposed that UCI suggest WADA to simplify the access and use of ADAMS whereabouts software by athletes.
Furthermore, the Commission declared its support for the integration of disabled athletes in non-para-cycling competitions, while limiting numbers for safety reasons. The Commission encourages the development of para-cycling so that the athletes concerned can enjoy accomplished careers.
The Commission suggests that athletes be invited to more commissions and working groups which define the direction of each discipline. The Commission suggests that athletes contribute their proposals via the following e-mail address: athletes.commission@uci.ch
Finally, the Athletes' Commission acknowledged the work conducted by the UCI on improving insurance cover and assisting riders after their sporting careers are over. The UCI has informed the Athletes' Commission of its desire for currently active athletes to transfer their skills by devoting themselves to the various professions of cycling after their sporting careers have concluded.
UCI President Pat McQuaid said: "The exchanges of the UCI Athletes' Commission have been very fruitful and I am delighted that representatives of all disciplines are meeting together in the second year of the Commission and working with the UCI on positive ways forward for our sport. We will now study the Commission’s recommendations and present them to all our stakeholders."
UCI Communications Service
Help us to fund our site
We’ve noticed you’re using an ad blocker. If you like road.cc, but you don’t like ads, please consider subscribing to the site to support us directly. As a subscriber you can read road.cc ad-free, from as little as £1.99.
If you don’t want to subscribe, please turn your ad blocker off. The revenue from adverts helps to fund our site.
If you’ve enjoyed this article, then please consider subscribing to road.cc from as little as £1.99. Our mission is to bring you all the news that’s relevant to you as a cyclist, independent reviews, impartial buying advice and more. Your subscription will help us to do more.
Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.
You can find out whether they're lying about 'taking action' by asking them what they actually did. When they refuse to tell you, citing various...
Blind spots eh. Just a reminder of the lorry driver who was aquitted after killing a cyclist on a roundabout where the jury obviously felt it was...
They give the figures for numbers of all casualties so should be possible to work this out?...
But don't forget to correct for altitude.
Also don't forget - Sustrans are a charity *....
Yes ... but (just due to the large numbers of people affected) this likely would only proceed in the UK at a very ... cautious ... pace....
Arsehole in the van not with standing, how did they manage to get a risk assessment allowing a race (a group not a TT) group to be competing on ...
I think reviewer completely missed the point here trying to match bike's name with what it can do. Ribble is namin git's bike weirdly, the...
Bit of googling gone wrong in the article - the JAT is the Junction Assessment Tool, the Joint Approval Team appears to be a coutner terrorism...