Jack has been writing about cycling and multisport for over a decade, arriving at road.cc via 220 Triathlon Magazine in 2017. He worked across all areas of the website including tech, news and video, and also contributed to eBikeTips before being named Editor of road.cc in 2021 (much to his surprise). Jack has been hooked on cycling since his student days, and currently has a Trek 1.2 for winter riding, a beloved Bickerton folding bike for getting around town and an extra beloved custom Ridley Helium SLX for fantasising about going fast in his stable. Jack has never won a bike race, but does have a master's degree in print journalism and two Guinness World Records for pogo sticking (it's a long story).
Add new comment
15 comments
I noticed the Paris-Roubaix challenge organisers were still trying to drum up entrants a few weeks ago.
I wondered if their event insurers would pay out more based on number of entrants, e.g. if it was worth their while holding out until the last minute?
I had already cancelled due to having low back surgery, can't say they made it especially easy...
Re: budget
Like immigrants, cyclist are just another minority that the current government at best doesn't give a #### about and at worst would love to get rid off.
Is 40% faster exactly equal to 40% more efficient?
I had the misfortune to accidentally listen to some of the budget speech, and it was an utterly appalling display of schoolboy laughing and jeering, self-congratulatory back slapping, mostly political, with lots of repetition of Boris the Liar's catchphrase "getting it done". It was frankly obnoxious.
As CUK say, there is almost nothing in it for cyclists, despite lots of rhetoric in the speech about being so green they'd disappear on a lawn. Even the amount earmarked for potholes will barely scratch the surface. It was basically is list of everything they'd done for the past ten years inverted, all the cuts reversed, all their own policies annulled and in the glorious Maggie's words, u-turned.
My MP will be hearing from me, but being true blue, he will be pointing out that they've spent some money on paint in Lydney, and ignoring the rest.
EDIT: They are actually planning to spend what labour were called marxists for planning to spend.
It's shocking but not unexpected.
With Covid-19 being especially dire for people with compromised breathing, I'd've thought it would be more logical to get more people involved in active travel and out of motorised vehicles. I was reading just the other day about how tyres are a major source of vehicle pollution (especially large, heavy vehicles) along with the brakes and neither of those are legislated or controlled.
Modulo the catchphrase - this describes much of the dealings in the House, for decades, transport-related or otherwise.
ASO has just cancelled Paris Nice Challenge they also organise Paris Roubaix
https://www.timeto.com/en-GB/sports/cycling/paris-nice-challenge-2020
Re the Budget,tbf the politicians would argue the 500m extra pothole fund does benefit cyclists,and the budget document (always way more important to read than the Chancellors soundbites for news clips speech)also restates the fund for buses/cycling they announced last month and a 1billion fund for transforming cities which includes some cycling infra. So its not alot and whether it's new money or existing announced stuff hard to tell,but it's more than nothing for sure.
Well, I suppose at least the Govt claim they'll make a start on fixing the potholes...
(Although I wonder whether that'll only be on the strategic road network and they'll leave councils to pick up the tab for fixing local roads still...).
(It's sort of relevant to that twitter video clip, so bear with me).
I was in the (painted) cycle lane going up Colston Street in Bristol this morning when a woman tried to pass me in her car.
The painted lane is handlebar width (being generous) and she couldn't move over in her lane at all because of cars queuing for the traffic lights by Colston Hall.
So she appeared behind me, then eveeer soooo slooowly edged forward, forward, forward (all while about a foot at most off my right bar-end), level with me, sloooowly forward (clearly thinking she was being really careful and safe).
And then she had to fall back as she realised the cyclists ahead of me, and then me, were having to move out of the cycle lane because the builders had put the signs warning about the traffic lights for people driving down the hill in the uphill cycle lane (and the triangle warning signs are basically the same width as the cycle lane).
It's the only time I think I've ever been passed so closely that I could have just held onto her wing mirror and got a lift up the hill.
And I think she had no idea that she was doing anything wrong at all...
I had thought that most drivers in Bristol were now used to cyclists and drove accordingly, but perhaps she's not a local. Have the warning signs been reported for obstructing traffic? I once reported an abandoned car in a cycle lane in North Bristol, which was still there a few days later, so I rang the police non-emergency number and pointed out that it was a seriously hazard and very dangerous for cyclists, followed up by reporting it on their website too. I don't know if that's why, but it was moved pronto.
I thought that cycle routes were the ideal place to put motorist only signs.
This is on NCN 4, slightly more paint on the shared use path than the standard triangle.
And isn't it standard practice for road workers to put road work signs in cycle routes, I mean, the've all been told that nobody cycles in them.
I did once complain to my local council for doing that and tbf they did move them...that one time
When it snows, which admittedly isn't very often, my council (Enfield) helpfully piles up all the snow cleared from the roads in the cycle lanes, where it freezes solid and makes the lanes unrideable for days after everywhere else has thawed.