Like this site? Help us to make it better.


Cycling the fastest way around UK's most congested cities, finds new report

Latest annual Global Traffic Scorecard from Inrix includes cycling metrics for the first time

Cycling is the quickest way of getting around some of the UK’s most congested cities, according to the latest annual Global Traffic Scorecard from traffic data experts Inrix – which, for the first time, includes metrics relating to travelling by bike or by public transport.

Several of the UK cities included in the global ranking such as London, Birmingham and Manchester, are in the midst of developing extensive cycle networks, including protected lanes for bikes as they aim to cut traffic congestion and improve air quality.

London, ranked the third most congested city globally last year, drops to eighth on the 2019 scorecard, with the capital’s motorists spending an average of 149 hours stuck in traffic jams during the year and an average last-mile speed of just 10 miles per hour.

Following it in the list of the 10 most congested UK cities, in ranking order, are Belfast, Bristol, Edinburgh, Manchester, Cardiff, Birmingham, Southampton, Nottingham and Hull.

The fastest average last mile speed in the ten cities is Birmingham at 16mph, meaning for the vast majority of us - depending on the traffic lights and various other factors - cycling will be faster than driving in all of these cities.

The fastest last-mile speed is found in Birmingham, but even then, at 16 miles an hour it’s one that many regular cycle commuters would be able to exceed.

The West Midlands city recently unveiled plans to ban through traffic from crossing the city centre by dividing it into zones, similar to the approach taken by cities in the Netherlands elsewhere.

> Birmingham heralds end to “golden age of cars” by banning trips by private motorists across city centre

London and Edinburgh – which has the highest levels of cycle commuting in Scotland and has unveiled a scheme to make its Georgian New Town safer for people on foot and on bike – are the only two cities where public transport is quicker than driving.

Among the other cities on the list, Nottingham, which has a workplace parking levy that has attracted interest from city authorities elsewhere in the country, saw a 17 per cent reduction in congestion.

Meanwhile, Manchester is the focal point of Transport for Greater Manchester’s Bee Network of cycling and walking network championed by Chris Boardman, while Cardiff recently introduced segregated cycle lanes close to its university.

> Greater Manchester 'can be national blueprint’ for cycling and walking, Boris Johnson told

Trevor Reed, transportation analyst at Inrix, commented: “Congestion costs drivers, businesses and the UK economy billions of pounds each year. With the rising price of motoring, consumers are getting hit hardest.

“With the UK budget due soon, hopefully the Chancellor will take the opportunity to address this issue with continued investments in transport networks.”

Inrix, which says that traffic congestion costs the UK economy £6.9 billion annually, has recommended major improvements to public transport and rail networks as one solution to stop hours being wasted in traffic jams.

It has also said that making streets safer for people on bikes would help persuade many motorists to switch to cycling and thereby ease congestion.

Simon joined as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment


grumpyoldcyclist | 4 years ago

Who'd have thought? Inrix, who are used by the Highways Agency and which is totally anti cyclist, has said that cycling is the fastest way around some of our major cities.

The irony, but sadly they will probably dig their heels in deeper and not change policy. Still good though to hear yet more organisations stating what has been obvious for ages and ages and ages........

ktache | 4 years ago

But don't cycle routes cause congestion?


Philh68 replied to ktache | 4 years ago

Of course they do, look at the Netherlands. Their cycle routes are chock a block full of people cycling, it must be so frustrating yes

pmurden | 4 years ago

No shit springs to mind. How much did that report cost?

srchar | 4 years ago

Anyone who swings a leg over a bike has known this for yonks... it seems this report uses it as a reason to justify spending money increasing average speeds for cars, rather than to encourage people to switch to cycling:

"With the rising price of motoring, consumers are getting hit hardest."

No, people who make the choice to drive a privately owned car through congested cities are.

eburtthebike replied to srchar | 4 years ago

Why am I only allowed to like this comment once?

Hirsute replied to srchar | 4 years ago

It's like that Bristol Post race where the bike came first.

Conclusion: public transport is too slow.

(thanks to brooksby for noting that one).

MrGear replied to srchar | 4 years ago

I never really understood this "war on the motorist" narrative. It's never been cheaper to drive. You can buy cars that have zero road tax and do 70mpg really cheaply.

Drivers are massively subsidised by the huge cost of the infrastructure they have access to, and you only get a parking or speeding ticket if you break the law.

There is no war on the motorist - they've had it far too easy for far too long. If drivers get stuck in traffic and waste their lives sitting there, it's their own stupid choice, not a personal assult on their liberties.

Latest Comments