Jack has been writing about cycling and multisport for over a decade, arriving at road.cc via 220 Triathlon Magazine in 2017. He worked across all areas of the website including tech, news and video, and also contributed to eBikeTips before being named Editor of road.cc in 2021 (much to his surprise). Jack has been hooked on cycling since his student days, and currently has a Trek 1.2 for winter riding, a beloved Bickerton folding bike for getting around town and an extra beloved custom Ridley Helium SLX for fantasising about going fast in his stable. Jack has never won a bike race, but does have a master's degree in print journalism and two Guinness World Records for pogo sticking (it's a long story).
Add new comment
11 comments
Now they know how many potholes it takes to fill the Albert Hall.
Those shoes don't fit properly, so he has deliberately cut them at the point where they are too narrow. I've done the same to my cycling shoes. He's added the laces to try to keep a tight fit.
It doesn't really matter whether the cyclist is a policeman or not, because the British driver knows that the sanction is going to be relatively light. In no other sphere of life of which I'm aware, can you in effect deliberately (or negligently) come within inches of killing another person (or crippling him or her for life), and still expect to receive a £100 fine.
The oft-cited example is to compare what would happen to you if you indiscriminately fired a handgun into the crowd, whilst walking down Oxford Street. The drivers' rebuttal is that firearms are illegal in the UK whilst cars are not, and also, that the purpose of a firearm is in fact to kill, unlike motor vehicles.
Well, quite. So let's take the example of an object that is not designed to kill, the ownership or possession of which is entirely legal. I dunno.. a frozen turkey. Buy a turkey, walk down the street swinging it above your head, yelling at people to get out of the way. What will happen? You will be arrested, make the front papers of probably every tabloid in the country, and will receive either a hefty fine, or else a short custodial sentence. If you actually hit and injure someone, that time spent at Her Majesty's pleasure will be appropriately lengthened.
Only in the context of the motor car, is the offender dealt with, with such indulgence.
Bloody whingeing cyclists! Look, we've promised you a thorough review of road law, in 2014, and we've actually done the bit about blaming cyclists, so just shut up will you.
These drivers must have thought they were in west sussex or gloucestershire
or Cheshire perhaps?
Least I know what to do now to get my videos of close passes looked into, application for police force in the post.
Some drivers (generally gammons) really do not give an actual about how dangerous it can be.
I had to take a lane to avoiding some rather extreme pot holes this morning and some old gammon insisted on squeezing past despite standing traffic 50m ahead. Politely (it was hard) asked him why so close and didn’t he see the potholes, his reply...... "yes he saw them and he hopes I die".
Probably still angry over brexit.
Jeez - if plod in full uniform are being close-passed then we are well and truly knackered.
Indeed. A driver who not only close passes (to whom you might give the benefit of the doubt and say they are simply incompetent or ignorant) but actually beeps at a policeman and criticises them shows a whole new level of stupidity and aggression.
Maybe the motorist though it was a 'POLITE NOTICE.'