Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Council refuses to light city centre cycleway that has seen spate of collisions and a robbery

St Albans cycle route is popular with commuters, but the council says it's too expensive to light...

Sy Albans council has said that it has no plans to light a popular cycle route that has recently seen collisions and even a robbery.

The Alban Way is a city centre route that conveniently runs around St Albans and Hatfield.

It is used by commuters and pedestrians, including cyclist Phil Fletcher.

He told the Herts Advertiser: “I have recently moved to St Albans, and one of the nicest things here is the Alban Way, like an arrow through the heart of the city, conveniently connecting various shopping centres and going beyond to Hatfield.

“One can avoid congested roads and simply go about one’s daily business on a bike.”

But, he said, after dark he recently came off the path when he was forced to swerve as a cyclist came towards him.

He said: “I don’t know whether there are plans to widen the pathway, to install lighting along at least part of the Alban Way, or to mark the edge of the path, making it easily visible at night.

“For that matter, I do not know what funding is available to carry out these measures or any other improvements to cycling infrastructure.”

It was more sinisterly the location chosen by assailants in November who threatened and robbed a young woman in the early evening.

Head of community services at St Albans council Debbi White said: “We have investigated lighting the Alban Way but the cost is prohibitive. It is more than six miles long and lights would cost many hundreds of thousands of pounds just to install.

“Lights are not a guarantee of a complete end to the occasional cycling accident or any other incident.

“Thankfully such events are extremely rare and thousands of cyclists, pedestrians, and dog walkers enjoy using the Alban Way every week.

“The Alban Way encourages people to use green transport and take healthy exercise while plants, birds, insects and other animals can thrive.

“If anyone feels unsafe after dark, then they can use the surrounding lighted streets and take an alternative route.”

It’s not the first time this piece of infrastructure has been criticised.

Back in 2015 we reported how cycling campaigners spoke out about work to widen the Alban Way, a 3m shared footpath and cycleway to form part of the Green Ring. Campaigner Peter Wares said that the path still wasn’t wide enough.

“It should have been widened by 2m as 0.5m is not enough. It is going to be even more used when it becomes part of the planned Green Ring route. Some people feel we shouldn’t be chopping down the trees as they are oak and are of some value but they will still have to come down in a few years’ time because the problem is going to get worse,” he said

“The trees will continue to grow out across the path, which will inevitably lead to further narrowing and I feel at least one of the trees should have been removed as a compromise.”

 

Add new comment

11 comments

Avatar
BehindTheBikesheds | 7 years ago
3 likes

We are stressing about cost of lighting a cycle path and yet there's a shit ton of money to light the main roads and motorways across the country even when there's no bugger on them and lights it up like daytime.
As for glare, with the modern LED street lights this isn't an issue and the Dutch kids manage somehow with their low level lights on their cycle lanes to school in the winter months.

Avatar
spen replied to BehindTheBikesheds | 7 years ago
2 likes

BehindTheBikesheds wrote:

We are stressing about cost of lighting a cycle path and yet there's a shit ton of money to light the main roads and motorways across the country even when there's no bugger on them and lights it up like daytime. As for glare, with the modern LED street lights this isn't an issue and the Dutch kids manage somehow with their low level lights on their cycle lanes to school in the winter months.

 

Any light shining into your eyes rather than on to the path surface is a problem.  Do agree though that solar lights are a much better solution on cycle paths, certainly much cheaper.  We have some on a path near me and I've heard that they turn off around 1am and comeback in around 6 isn't so they don't need massive storage 

Avatar
janusz0 | 7 years ago
0 likes

@ crazy-legs

Actually solar powered lights in the pedalway can work very nicely.  The lights along the bike track south of Addebrookes' Hospital, Cambridge, are a good example.  They are more than adequate to warn you of cyclists without lights approaching.  They must be a lot cheaper than laying cable and erecting lamp standards.  It's a pity they don't have a LASER option to disable lights that are blindingly bright.

Avatar
Gavin_H | 7 years ago
0 likes

Good. There's too much energy being wasted on wrecking the night skies, less streetlights the better.

Avatar
crazy-legs replied to Gavin_H | 7 years ago
2 likes

Gavin_H wrote:

Good. There's too much energy being wasted on wrecking the night skies, less streetlights the better.

It's a disused railway path track, it doesn't need full streetlights. You could put in some much lower level (3m) LED lights, rather than the 6m streetlights you get along roads. Could even have them solar powered, they'd be basically self-contained.

One of the reasons people don't walk and cycle is because they feel unsafe and having a nice safe traffic-free route rendered unsafe / unusable doesn't help with sustainable transport or crime figures.

Avatar
spen replied to crazy-legs | 7 years ago
0 likes

crazy-legs wrote:

Gavin_H wrote:

Good. There's too much energy being wasted on wrecking the night skies, less streetlights the better.

It's a disused railway path track, it doesn't need full streetlights. You could put in some much lower level (3m) LED lights, rather than the 6m streetlights you get along roads. Could even have them solar powered, they'd be basically self-contained.

One of the reasons people don't walk and cycle is because they feel unsafe and having a nice safe traffic-free route rendered unsafe / unusable doesn't help with sustainable transport or crime figures.

 

The problem with using a 3 m column would be that they much more prone to suffer vandalism and the lower the column the less the spread of the light, the greater the number of columns needed and the angle of the head would have to tilted away from horizontal to cover the width of the path, increasing the likelihood of dazzle

Avatar
sam_smith | 7 years ago
2 likes

Why don't they convert to LED lights? LED lights are low voltage, cheaper and more reliable too but too many councils are stuck in the past street lighting and cycle provisions being obvious examples.

Avatar
Hirsute replied to sam_smith | 7 years ago
1 like

sam_smith wrote:

Why don't they convert to LED lights? LED lights are low voltage, cheaper and more reliable too but too many councils are stuck in the past street lighting and cycle provisions being obvious examples.

Eh? There are no lights to convert...

Avatar
Grahamd | 7 years ago
5 likes

In Monmouthshire the council deemed lighting their own car park to deter thieves a greater priority than street lighting for safety. Who says politicians have lost touch with the electorate?

Avatar
Metaphor | 7 years ago
6 likes

This is Britain 2017. A failed state. No money for lighting in St Albans, no money for paint in Oxford

Avatar
Hirsute | 7 years ago
0 likes

Where I live the street lights are turned off at midnight everywhere !

Latest Comments