The New Forest National Park Authority (NFNPA) has defended its record on cycling, saying it has invested more than £2m on improving cycle facilities, reports The Daily Echo. The comments come in response to a suggestion from Cycling UK that local opposition to cycling has often been “entirely irrational.”
Earlier this month, the NFPNA’s head of recreation management and learning reported that the New Forest Cycle Event Organisers’ Charter "seems to have stood the test of time" following its introduction in 2015.
The charter came about following sabotage of sportives, reports of bad behaviour by some participants and problems caused by date clashes with pony drifts.
Citing reasons such as improved communication between organisers and the local community, Nigel Matthews wrote that, “for the majority of the year (as in 2015), cycle events seemed to take place more peacefully than in the past.”
Nevertheless, the New Forest’s cycling reputation remains poor. In 2014, the NFNPA was told to hand back £1.5 million of government money allocated for cycling after the Department for Transport (DfT) rejected two schemes it had planned to spend the money on. One of those, accounting for £1.25 million, was criticised for being more focused on road maintenance than on cycling.
Cycling UK has previously contrasted the attitude to cycling in the New Forest with that in the Yorkshire Dales, suggesting that opposition to cycling events is often “entirely irrational.”
In its September 2016 response to the inquiry by the Commons Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee, the charity recommended that the duty to promote opportunities for outdoor recreation should be enshrined within National Parks’ legislation.
"For years increased access for walkers was opposed on the basis it would lead to devastation in the countryside. Sadly the same arguments are still being trotted out to oppose improved access for cyclists.
"While one national park (the Yorkshire Dales) has recently welcomed the Tour de France, broadcasting 'God's own country' globally, another (the New Forest) has been forced to hand back grant funding to the government after cancelling a public hire bike scheme due to anti-cycling sentiment among local decision-makers.
"This opposition to cycling is often entirely irrational. Extensive research into issues such as wildlife disturbance, erosion and perceptions of conflict has repeatedly disproved the relevant arguments."
Responding this week, the NFNPA's head of recreation, Nigel Matthews, said:
"The Forest’s extensive network of waymarked gravel tracks and superb natural environment make it a great place for a leisurely bike ride.
"Since 2013 we have invested over £2 million to improve the national park for cyclists, including improved cycle hire facilities, miles of new and improved off-road cycle paths and improved infrastructure for storing bikes.
"As a result of our work on the Cycle Event Organisers’ Charter the management of on-road cycle sportive events is also much improved. We remain fully committed to protecting and enhancing the local environment and promoting opportunities for public enjoyment."
Sam Jones, Campaigns coordinator at Cycling UK said that currently cyclists can only legally access less than 100 miles of over 300 miles of the New Forest’s network of off-road gravel tracks, while logging trucks and horse and carts are free to use them.
“That simply doesn’t make sense. If the New Forest is serious about encouraging cycling while minimising conflict, then these unnecessary and unjustified restrictions should be lifted.”
On the issue of conflict, he added: “Unfortunately with any group, whether driving, cycling, walking or horse riding, there will always be the potential for individuals to behave irresponsibly. Such behaviour should never be endorsed, but nor should it be used to tarnish a whole.
“Recently Cycling UK, together with the Ramblers and the British Horse Society, gave evidence to Parliament, where the agreement between all our organisations is that there is no evidence of systematic conflict between our groups.
“It is the perception of conflict which is getting in the way of progress, and we would urge the New Forest National Park Authority not to be swayed by “anecdata” but to emulate other national parks by promoting opportunities for outdoor recreation.”
Add new comment
16 comments
Some good points Bikeshopbloke, but just wondering about the last sentence. Are you talking about the motorists that kill children and ponies?
I wouldn't normally stick up for the monolithic nanny state organisations whose actions sometimes stifle our freedom to enjoy our hobbies responsibly but 'to be fair' again, we have had great support from the NPA for our local cycling business in the New Forest. There are layers of politics to wade through in local government regarding cycling here but we have found the actual officers working on behalf of the NPA and Forestry commission are extremely positive regarding on and off-road cycling but their hands are tied in terms of the organisations they officially represent and there are a number of consultative groups with powers of veto who are often represented by less supportive views. Sometimes they have genuine concerns over access issues but sometimes more nimby-like concerns are apparent. I think with more proactive support and directives from national bodies, aligned with mass local community support, changes can be made in the long-term which could see a greater belief in and acceptance of the benefits associated with increased cycling in the Forest. As always, its the actions of a few that ruin the image portayed of the many and the press do often like to stir things up for their own newsworthiness!
To be fair there has been considerable investment in the path linking Lyndhurst to Ashurst and on to Southampton which means you can access the forest easily from the east. On the west side you've got the Castleman Trailway linking from Bournemouth/Poole to Ringwood.
The off-road riding is bloody excellent - the trails are wide (because logging trucks) and basically empty. Nice rolling terrain and in some cases quicker A-B than using the road network. Unfortunately a few gaps where you get chucked out on to a busy main road and many aren't waymarked/publicised. There's a campaign trying to change that by pressuring for all tracks to be open which will remove confusion - currently its too easy to end up cycling somewhere you shouldn't.
The NPA are obsessed with restricting visitor numbers because it's so accessible - much more than any other NP as far as they're concerned - hence the anti-cycling stance.
I think that the authority and Cycling UK are talking at cross purposes. The authority is saying everything is great and wonderful so long as you only want to ride recreationally on off road / gravel tracks. Cycling UK is saying that if you actually want to ride anywhere else in the Forest then it's all a bit rubbish. Different terms of reference, see?
"The comments come in response to a suggestion from Cycling UK that local opposition to cycling has often been “entirely irrational.”"
Well they are in good company. There are many and various schemes for cyclists which are fairly anodyne, but get opposition completely out of proportion with the proposal.
I can't vouch for improvements to road cycling but the network of off road trails totalling over a 100 miles is superb. Money well spent indeed. If you haven't ever been off road in the last ten years you will have missed these wonderful improvements.
There is a large network of off roads routes, agreed, but these are often not linked without having to take to some of the busier roads which isn't ideal for a family experience especially with the younger non road savvy cyclist, and most of the better riding in the Forest isn't included with these offical routes.
My understanding is the Forestry Commission, who own a large amount of the Forest, want to create more routes, better facilities, and a better experience for more advanced riders (let's face it the gravel track routes in the forest are a bit tame if you want something more than family friendly) are being prevented from doing so by the other authorities in charge. Can't recall if this is the NFNPA, the Verders though.
Here's another link:
http://metro.co.uk/2016/05/22/whats-wrong-with-this-cycle-path-5897967/
http://www.bournemouthecho.co.uk/news/14494655.The_3m_cycle_lane_that_se...
try that link instead
Wow! Even for a local authority, that is cringeingly awful. I hope that the designers have been sacked, and are now working for a consultancy doing exactly the same for twice the money. The standard of design for cyclists in this country is appalling and shows no sign of improving.
How strange. It worked 10 minutes ago!
It's a comedy and potentially lethal bike lane installed in Brockenhurst which served no positive purpose and routed riders into parked cars but no doubt the local council could brag about their investment in cycling. It made it onto Road.cc when first built so have a search on here.
I love the new forest and I visit half a dozen times a year but it's an odd place. People are happy to be stuck in gridlocked tourist traffic in Lyndhurst for hours on end but let them get stuck behind a group of more than one cyclist and they're fuming.
£2 million? They must've pissed that up a wall because I've seen no improvement for cyclists in the 10 years I've lived and cycled in the area.
That's pretty ungrateful. What about the cycle path built in Brockenhurst:
http://www.bournemouthecho.co.uk/news/14494655.The_3m_cycle_lane_that_se...
can't work out if this is satire as the link you post 'cannot be found' or if there is a faculty and you think it's great.
Ah yes, sorry. Please accept my humble apology...
Some initial problems maybe? New Forest National Park Authority is NFPNA in para 2 & NWNPA in para 9.