- News
- Live blog

Tadej Pogačar filmed “recklessly” veering into oncoming traffic and overtaking cars on bends riding in Monaco; Junior prodigy Ezra Bateman wins British hill climb champs but denied national title after not entering open category + more on the live blog

Tadej Pogačar's choices
We receive lots of emails about things related to the best cyclist in the world. What gels he’s using, when he is next jumping on an indoor trainer, what bird he spotted on a training ride up the Col de la Madone. One of those might be made up, but you get the gist about the sort of PR that fills our inbox.
But none of it captures road.cc’s quintessence quite like a video of the Slovenian riding through his Monaco home, taking rather a few liberties on his commute. Swipe along below to see what all the fuss is about.
Interestingly, the original person who uploaded the videos, a Dutch junior called Noah Alfrink, doesn’t have the same clips seen above on his Instagram anymore, and has instead made a series of edits of his wheelsucking set to some frankly horrendous music.
Anyway, that’s enough background, our first video shows Pogačar rounding a bus on the outside into a turning lane whilst the road curves naturally to the right, making quite a blindspot.
A similar thing happens in the second video, although with the caveat that he overtakes the car before the turn or oncoming car. The same cannot be said for Alfrink however, who on both clips ends up accelerating frantically to avoid riding into the path of oncoming drivers, desperate to stay on Pogačar’s wheel and scoop up more content for the socials. A quick look at his Instagram feed suggests he’s posted versions of the same video six times in three days, albeit set to slightly different TikTok music slop each time.
The comments on the post suggesting Pogačar’s own riding was “reckless” seem to shut down the suggestion, which isn’t exactly what we were anticipating:
“If you stop going for a gap that exists, you stop being a racing driver!”
“So what, he’s quite literally the best cyclist of all time, I reckon he knows how to dodge traffic”
“The real problem is the camera snitch”
“Just let him ride his bike, he’s not putting any lives in danger.”
And on it goes. What none of this seems to identify is that this is not a race, and there is serious danger to a cyclist being hit by a driver. Pogačar here is putting himself in greater danger, whilst the “hype” and “aura” he brings to social media is making riders like Alfrink ride recklessly in pursuit of his slipstream.
It reminds me of when Jonas Vingegaard crashed earlier in the year when he was followed by an amateur and felt intruded upon.

It seems in this case as though Pogačar gave permission for Alfrink to follow him, at one point posing for a photo, though that by no means makes him responsible for his behaviour. But it’s another story where we’re left questioning the behaviour of a pro, an amateur, and the safety of the roads they race on.
You’ll be pleased to know, because we’re very serious people, we’ve contacted UAE Team Emirates-XRG for comment…
Cyclocross miscalculation
Manifesting a jump perhaps?
Blog: Driver martyrdom must stop

Help us to bring you the best cycling content
If you’ve enjoyed this article, then please consider subscribing to road.cc from as little as £2.49. Our mission is to bring you all the news that’s relevant to you as a cyclist, independent reviews, impartial buying advice and more. Your subscription will help us to do more.
No Comments
Read more...
Read more...
Read more...
Latest Comments
@Rendel Harris If only you'd read my previous comment more carefully... I clearly justified my position by appealing to the concept of a public good. The TdF isn't one, so why are you demanding to decide how the investor should spend their money? That is exactly the middle ground you're talking about — leaving control in the hands of the owners when the goods in question are not indispensable, while retaining control over essential ones. BTW, monopoly? I imagine there are hundreds of other public events in most UK towns. Are you going to hire an army of public officers and introduce price regulation for rock concerts as well?
@tomlew Yes, there's absolutely no middle ground between disgracefully exploitative overcharging and giving things away for free, is there? Just sit back and accept whatever private companies want to charge once they have achieved a monopoly of something and be happy, marvellous. Don't complain or ask for fair pricing because that would be "spending someone else's money". It's worked so well with water and power and fuel and rent, hasn't it?
@Rendel Harris So where's my new bike? I feel I deserve it, so I guess you owe me one now. It's always so easy to spend somebody else's money, isn't it?
@tomlew Ah, good old "market forces", the excuse for price gouging everywhere. Just because you can get away with charging stupid prices doesn't mean you should or that it's right to do so.
I bought mine more than 4 years ago and have used it many times, flying all over Europe - exclusively with BA. The baggage handlers have given them a good thumping. We've had the frame itself dented significantly and pierced (one assumes - and Ed from Buxumbox confirms - this is hard to do on the shell cage!) The sides are dented, as expected, and were pierced on one occasion. We witnessed a baggage handler at Tenerife airport lift and throw our boxes onto the conveyor belt single handed. It bounced off the edge of the belt at least once. One of the boxes also started to behave like a shopping trolley so I have replaced the front wheels (now a new design) and I was told that this is due to the box being dropped onto them. The bikes have - up to now - always survived this handling. Does anyone have any tips on how to dissuade a single baggage handler do this? Do you overestimate the weight so that they might be inclined to get two baggage handler to move them? They are certainly great for quick disassembly and re-assembly, albeit a pain to get a taxi for. A Mercedes Vito with the rear seats down or removed, a Renault Scenic likewise. Two (with two small cases) also fit inside a Dacia Jogger with the rear seats down - perhaps we should have a database...?
I know many a mechanic who feels fear every time one of her branded cycles is presented for a service. They are astoundingly bad quality; cheap components, shoddily put together, difficult to adjust and usually not worth it. The Pendleton e-bikes are exceptionally cr@p. Why do people put their names to such rubbish?
@Rendel Harris Market forces, probably. But I'm no expert. I realize some of us here love cycling, but what would make forfeiting extra income excusable? And even if the tickets were cheaper, how would you prevent extra demand so that people prevented from participating would not complain about being treated unfairly? Why don't we simply acknowledge TdF is not a public good, it is just another commercial event. With a bit of luck you can probably survive without it.
@slownomad From the DVSA/DoT Guidance Notes that your link refers to: "To be classified as an EAPC under the EAPC regulations[footnote 1], the cycle must:" etc. . It then goes on to say: "If an EAPC does not comply with the regulations, it is treated as a motor vehicle under the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 and the Road Traffic Act 1988" So no, it does not say that the only EAPC is a legal EAPC. As you say bike may refer to pedal cycles or motorbikes. E-bike logically follows the same usage and includes EAPCs. "Electrically Assisted Pedal Cycle" is a technical description. The EAPC Regulations 1983 allow for some EAPCs to be treated in law as pedal cycles. The Guidance Notes finish with a disclaimer: "This guidance is a summary of DfT’s understanding of what the law requires." etc.. & finishes with "You are therefore advised to consult the relevant legislation and, if necessary, seek independent advice." So even the DVSA & DoT don't actually know what it all means.
Not noted in the review but the old Crux was a CX - gravel racer whereas this new one seems to be pure gravel, taking inspiration from road race bikes more than anything. What’s happening with specialized and CX? Is it just being left behind or is this the bike still for CX?
@RayG In my experience many of the people who attend overpriced events like these aren't genuine fans but people with high disposable incomes who like to go "for the experience" and to say that they were there. In any case, even if every ticket was sold to a dyed-in-the-wool cycling fan who was prepared to pay silly money because it's a once-in-a-lifetime chance to see the Depart in their home town/country, why would that make charging exploitative prices excusable?