There is a lot to unpack about the case of Jerry Ross, who in May decided to drive into a group of cyclists.
We could firstly ask whether a man who we now know suffers from a multitude of severe health conditions should be driving in the first place; but then again, his health conditions almost certainly weren’t anything to do with why he drove into a group of cyclists. He did it deliberately and calculatedly because, in his words: “You know, just tired of it, man. They just, you know. Do what the hell they want.”
View this post on Instagram
Is it a story about delusion? Possibly, after all he claims “I’ll take this to the Supreme Court,” and that he will not spend a day in jail.
However, rather than this simply being the story of a delusional, bigoted man, I believe this is a tale charting the progression of the dehumanisation of cyclists. It’s an attempt to create another ‘us vs them’ narrative by a media ecosystem in the US that focuses on clicks and outrage over justice, or holding the powerful to account.
On this occasion, that narrative has been reaffirmed by a senior reporter writing for the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, who published a bizarre article titled ‘A driver passed too close to cyclists. Now he could die in prison.’
Rather than opening the article by describing the video that unequivocally shows Ross leaning on his horn and deliberately driving into a group of cyclists, knocking one down and fracturing his spine, we have this:
“Ross is 73 years old, weakened by stroke and heart attack, with a scar down the middle of his chest and a collection of pills on the kitchen counter. Beta blockers, blood thinners and so forth. Sometimes he gets dizzy coming up the stairs in the garage and he leans so hard against the wall that he scrapes his arm and leaves a little trail of his thinned-out blood.”
I know the US has a lot of awful people in it, with most of them feeling particularly emboldened at the moment, but trying to make a martyr of a man who has been caught bang to rights trying to hurt people because they decided to ride a bike seems particularly disgusting. What is the material difference between this and somebody mowing down pedestrians because they disagreed with something they were doing? Not much, but I can’t imagine the writer would be interviewing the person who hit three pedestrians outside a bar in Atlanta on the 10th of October with such soft gloves.
The article isn’t packaged in the shock jock style you’d expect from how I’ve described it so far, but that doesn’t stop it from perhaps being the most egregious case of othering I’ve ever seen regarding cyclists in my 16 years of writing about bikes and cycling. It’s not entirely surprising that it’s coming from the US, given the quality of journalism that we’ve seen there in the last decade.
Here’s what worries me: although the old adage that ‘when America sneezes, the world catches a cold’ traditionally refers to economics, I think it’s increasingly becoming true with social and media trends too. Think about how the Telegraph seems to have gone from something a bank manager buys for the crossword to a far right-supporting rag, and how that esteemed TV and radio channel GB News is just Fox News in a bowler hat.
So, while I can say that in my opinion the writer of the hideous Atlanta Journal article is a shill who’s moral compass is more skewed than a certain building in Pisa, and that Jerry Ross has a conscience you’d need a sniffer dog to find, and a temper you’d need a bomb squad to defuse, the real problem is that both appear to have a willing army of nodders agreeing with them.
There has been so much programming done about cyclists in the media that driving into a group of people who have the audacity to exist on a road, is expressed as a story with equal blame on both sides. That is morally repugnant, and whilst I hope we don’t see this kind of garbage come to the UK, we are seeing the seeds being sewn already. Whether that’s the nonsense Rupert Lowe spouts about e-bikes, the seemingly constant harassment of cyclists by Telegraph journalists, or the thousands of videos online showing people abusing cyclists.
Unfortunately, we are living during a time where anger sells, and cyclists are an easy target. While this may be in Atlanta today, we need to call it out now, or it might be happening in Abingdon before we know it.

18 thoughts on “The disturbing attempt to martyr a US hit-and-run driver needs to be called out far and wide before it happens in the UK”
It’s already here on a milder level. Every time someone holds cyclists mutually responsible for the behaviour of bad cyclists. Every time someone talks about how arrogant cyclists are, how they think they own the road, and other instances of projection. Every time some journalist makes a joke about beheading cyclists with piano wire, a joke that wouldn’t be made about any other road user, and every time someone goes ahead and stretches wire across a bike path.
@the little onion You’re right!
I hope we don’t see this kind of garbage come to the UK, we are seeing the seeds being sewn already
Yes, by the police. They’re happy to send out the despicably insincere ‘thoughts and prayers’ when a cyclist is killed, but actively work against anything being done about the close-passing we’re enduring day in, day out. They refuse to do anything about the hordes of vehicles being driven around without MOT, and this forgiving nature persists even when the vehicle has failed MOT for serious safety defects.
ttps://upride.cc/incident/kv69ztm_vivaro_closepass/
etc. etc
@the little onion Yep, there’s a certain troll of this parish (not, to be fair, the regular idiot but another one who turns up occasionally) who, in addition to stating that there’s no point in sending drivers to prison if they kill or maim cyclists unless they were speeding or drunk frequently asks us to “have sympathy for the driver who will suffer the trauma of this unfortunate event for the rest of their lives.”
@Rendel Harris Whilst a large number of drivers who have killed & injured others may shed crocodile tears (your legal advisor will certainly advise you to do so). They all have to live with the consequences. This will obviously weigh more heavily on some than others.
I know someone who was involved in an accident, in their youth, where someone was killed. They were not at fault. They have not driven since. They did not want to be in the position where they felt responsible for another injury or death, even if it wasn’t their fault.
Having said all that, I don’t see why an expression of remorse (or hardship) is a mitigating factor in sentencing.
Lack of remorse, I would suggest, should be seen to be an aggravating factor.
@ChrisA – at sentencing ‘lack of remorse’ is indeed an aggravating factor which is why any advocate worth their salt is at pains to say how the incident has left their client tangled up in blue.
@ChrisA Absolutely, that is definitely the case. However the person of whom I’m thinking, and many others I see online, more or less blatantly say we should have more sympathy for the driver than the deceased cyclist, the attitude being almost how dare the cyclist by riding on an A road or at night or in fog or whatever have taken such risks that have now saddled the poor driver with a lifetime’s trauma.
Gaining credit for ‘remorse’ for an attack against a cyclist in a UK court is as simple as declaring ‘yeah, yeah, remorse, remorse’. If you conjure up a few tears, you’ll be established as a ‘humanitarian’ and be sent home with an award, and that’s only if you can even get the case past the established resistance from the police.
Has anyone else ever looked so self righteous and arrogant on a police mugshot?
@Mr Blackbird one comes to mind.
https://apnews.com/article/mug-shot-donald-trump-indictment-839920116a244df3e55bdedf33820a80
@Mr Blackbird Smugshot?
Is that a mixed media metaphor?
@mdavidford sequins, surely? 😉
@mdavidford should be ‘seeds being sowed’, I think
@mdavidford it is now!
Report from the front: it’s already here – just check out any of many ‘articles’ on the Oxford Mail site, or some of the comments on the Abingdon Blog any time cycling is mentioned.
I had a strange one the other day. I was waiting at a red light on my bicycle when a woman crossing the junction in her car, lowered the window and with a face demented with hate and rage screamed at me ‘you are meant to stop at a red light’. I was so dumbfounded I couldn’t even muster the energy to tell her to eff off.
@Rome73
I assume You don’t have video evidence.
As it would be worth submitting to the DVSA to let them know that driver’s eyesight is poor enough to have their licence revoked.
Motornormativity is fuelled by ignorant journalists writing lies for click bait revenue. There is zero redress for this, they just publish any garbage. This is par for the course for antisocial media and the rot it spreads. Complicit are the police, CPS and judges who all drive and read the same garbage. They are not independent thinkers, and have almost zero moral compass where people who use a bicycle are injured by dangerous arrogant drivers.
A broad powerful media campaign from the government could address this, but they don’t have the courage to do what is morally correct.