Forum Replies Created
-
Replies
-
It asked for a ram-raiding
It asked for a ram-raiding offence to be taken into account.
I always struggled a bit with
I always struggled a bit with this one.
There’s a complaint to be
There’s a complaint to be investigated; the result of that investigation determines whether they think that there’s a crime to pursue charges for.
Tadej Puddycat?
Tadej Puddycat?
Being interviewed (even under
Being interviewed (even under caution) is very much not the same as being charged.
Yes – it seems entirely
Yes – it seems entirely vexatious, and I imagine it won’t get any further than going through the motions.
stonojnr wrote:
I’d question how did the driver heard the swearing to make such a complaint.Presumably the police played them (or their lawyer) the video. It appears the complaint only came after the police pursued the driving offence.
Sounds like a box ticking
Sounds like a box ticking exercise to me – a complaint’s been made, so they have to go through the motions of talking to you before concluding that there’s nothing to see here.
Probably best to get the advice of someone more qualified than internet lawyers, though.
I would assume they’re coming
I would assume they’re coming from the far end of that view and falling down the steps, rather than trying to drive up them, but even so…
A bollard or two would fix that
Yup – then they can get stuck on the bollard instead.
Quote:
The signage is said to be 40cm too close to the kerb…because it’s not nearly obstructive enough of the footway as it is now.
Well here’s an unusual
Well here’s an unusual celebrity edition for the collection.
Is the error the saddle
Is the error the saddle height?
Is the outrage that the
Is the outrage that the council hasn’t done something about this clearly dangerous bog?
I assumed it would be a large
I assumed it would be a large number and its prime factors.