Forum Replies Created
-
Replies
-
For mobile phone use, how
For mobile phone use, how about removal of thumbs as a punishment?
It’ll be a month on Monday at exactly 17:25 since BTBS and his old sparring chum Don Simon (or is it don simon?) last logged in. Wouldn’t be surprised if they were back again at round 17:26 😉
Like to think they’ve spent their time away on a tandem road trip together…but I’m guessing that’s fairly unlikely. Shame, would’ve been interesting to find out how they’d settled the captain/stoker question.Sounds like you’ve banned them for a month!
Put some extra lamps on and this is about as far as cars needed to evolve.
I had one of those!!
Gutted when I had to sell it
You could try going to Woking
You could try going to Woking on the Railair link coach that drops you at Woking Station.
It is 150 yards from a Travelodge.
Woking also has direct trains to Exeter it certainly used to be cheaper from Woking to Exeter.
Has the definition of the
Has the definition of the word private changed recently?
So far, no question of why wasn’t the pedestrian using the official, safe, crossing infrastructure (provided at great expense for her convenience) that was a mere 30 feet away?Double standards, much?
Pedestrians are under NO obligation to use pedestrian crossings or to even cross only the green man is shown.
It cannot be classed as jaywalking as the offence does not exist in the UK.
Therefore it cannot be double standards.
Highway Code Rule 56
Highway Code Rule 56
Dogs. Do not let a dog out on the road on its own. Keep it on a short lead when walking on the pavement, road or path shared with cyclists or horse riders.
Seems fairly clear to me
Wine tasting in Gigondas
Nice easy cycling through vineyards to get there. Not that I’m suggesting you drink and ride of course
Is that because you may spill some?
wycombewheeler wrote:
If I was the Marshal I would just stop traffic at the checkpoint. 2 minutes is all it would take. They had no problem doing this for pedestrians at Kingston. Why have Marshall if they don’t have the authority to close the road in a clear emergency?Something that has not been mentioned any where by the hosts. Even though I did contact them earlier today (4th August 2016) about it.
http://www.getsurrey.co.uk/news/surrey-news/ridelondon-2016-mothers-frustration-trying-11690152
Precisely, more to the point why were plod being so spineless?
It would perhaps help that when the organisers have investigated they actually published their findings publicly.
Something that has not been
Something that has not been mentioned any where by the hosts. Even though I did contact them earlier today (4th August 2016) about it.
http://www.getsurrey.co.uk/news/surrey-news/ridelondon-2016-mothers-frustration-trying-11690152
I was always under the
I was always under the impression that ALL road users should obey the Highway Code. It is not just for pedestrians or motorists.
I think it may be something
I think it may be something to do with broadcast rights, not all programmes are on catch up on the other channels.
However I appreciate is too late for this year but for the future you could try one of these;
More concerning is that the
I bet he wouldn’t have done that to a police rider or someone on a motorbike.Take it from me as a motorbike rider yes he would. We get the same shit!
ianrobo wrote:
Actually I
Actually I want out of this mean narrow minded country just a shame I can not speak French or Dutch :-(May I suggest evening classes perhaps?
Nice easy cycling through vineyards to get there. Not that I’m suggesting you drink and ride of course