Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

TECH NEWS

Jonas Vingegaard uses 1x gearing for Tour de France opening stages

Team Jumbo-Visma teammate Wout van Aert has switched to a single chainring system too, so what's going on?

Jonas Vingegaard and his Jumbo-Visma teammate Wout van Aert have used SRAM 1x (single chainring) setups for the opening stages of this year’s Tour de France, the defending champion having used the same system during the recent Critérium du Dauphiné, a race that he won.

Jumbo-Visma switched from Shimano to SRAM groupsets at the start of the year, and SRAM says that the decision to run 1x is entirely down to the team and riders rather than commercial considerations.

2023 Tour de France Stage 1 Vingegaared © Zac WiLLIAMS SWpix.com (t-a Photography Hub Ltd) - 1 (1)

This pic and lead pic: © Zac WiLLIAMS SWpix.com (t-a Photography Hub Ltd)

“We don’t push Jumbo to use 1x gearing and there is no marketing around this, although it helps a lot, of course,” says SRAM’s Marie Didier. “The riders have the tools at their disposal, then they do what they want. They control what they do and we couldn’t impose them to use a product if we wanted to.”

We showed you last week how Jumbo-Visma use Wolf Tooth LoneWolf Aero chainguides on their road and time trial bikes to help keep the chain in place without a front derailleur.

> Running 1x? Wolf Tooth introduces LoneWolf Aero chainguide to avoid a dropped chain 

The World Tour has long threatened to turn to 1x (or single chainring) gearing set-ups... but is 2023 the year that it finally takes hold?

Earlier in the season Victor Campenaerts used a single chainring system from Classified, and a few weeks ago Primoz Roglic used a gravel groupset on the final stage of the Giro. With Jonas Vingegaard and Wout van Aert – two of cycling's biggest names –  now using 1x,  has it (once again) become a choice too popular for us amateur roadies to ignore?

EXTU4016.JPG

Is history repeating itself?

Before we take a look at Vingegaard's bike that we spotted this week at the Critérium du Dauphiné, let's cast our minds back to the last time that the pro teams made a concerted effort to ditch the little ring. Some of you might remember it wasn’t exactly a huge success!

> Should you run a 1x set-up on your road bike? 

It was of course the Aqua Blue team five years ago that hit the limelight, often for all the wrong reasons, whilst riding their 3T Strada bikes that could only run 1x set-ups. 

3T Strada 1x Aqua Blue - 3.jpg

The Strada (which is now available with a front mech), promised aero benefits thanks to the lack of front mech mount. However, the SRAM groupsets with 3T cassettes caused an almighty Twitter storm when Rick Delaney, the team owner no less, posted: "This lab rat thing is costing us results". This was following a shipped chain by one of his riders in the Tour de Suisse breakaway.

The here (and the now)

Victor Campenaert Classified

Fast forward a few years, and our next significant development in 1x setups being used for road stages was the Classified system on the bike of Victor Campenaerts at the Omloop Het Nieuwsblad classic. 

As you might have heard by now, the Classified system ditches the front mech in favour of a special rear hub with a reduction gear inside. It’s tech that thoroughly impressed us, so much so that it won our "Money No Object" component of the year in 2022.

Since then loads of wheel manufacturers clearly also see a future with Classified in it, and the likes of Hunt, Parcours, Enve, DT Swiss, Mavic and Reynolds, to name just a few, are now on board.

Victor Campenaert Classified 2

> Review: Classified Powershift Kit & Wheelset

As good as the Classified system is it does still have its cons, especially in the pro peloton. No, we’re not talking about Campenaerts having to walk up the Muur on his 62-tooth chainring setup, but rather wheel changes. Unless everyone chose to use it, which seems unlikely, then spare wheels won’t have the required tech hiding inside.

Oh, and it’s also questionable how much lighter the system actually is. This then raises the question of if it's actually worth ditching the tried and tested front mech.

1x looking pretty in pink!

Primož Roglič cervelo-sram-crank

> Check out Primož Roglič’s Giro-winning Cervelo S5

Arguably 1x’s biggest success in the pro peloton was just a few weeks ago, when Roglic used his SRAM XPLR-equipped Cervelo R5 to climb his way into pink at the Giro, winning the stage by a whopping 40 seconds. 

However, the supposed benefits of a 1x system, such as the weight saving, potential aero benefit and better chain line, were overshadowed somewhat by a chain drop on the steepest section of the course, resulting in a push by Roglic's ex-ski jumping teammate.

Primož Roglič Giro mechanical (GCN+)

Roglic’s setup used SRAM’s gravel XPLR XG-1271 cassette paired with a Red AXS XPLR rear mech to give him some absolutely tiny gears; the 40T chainring upfront and 10-44t gearing at the back resulted in a sub 1:1 gear ratio which certainly kept the eventual Giro winner spinning even on the multiple sections over 22%.

The end of the road for 1x?

APTD9972.JPG

> BMC prototype aero superbike spotted at Dauphine

So after that, did Jumbo–Visma decide that enough was enough? Well, no! In fact, it would appear that the Dutch team has doubled down on single chainrings.

IMG_6945.jpg

Vingegaard used a 1x setup on two stages of the Dauphiné and in both of the first two stages of this year's Tour de France. 

Our shots from the Dauphiné showed Vingegaard using a 50T aero SRAM front chainring paired with a 10-33T SRAM Red cassette.

The ratios

BGKN6781.JPG

> All the gear? Check out the gearing choices of the pros

Jumbo–Visma clearly reckons the gearing is sufficient for at least some stages of the Tour de France, and the first couple of days have hardly been flat. 

The biggest gear that this 50x10 gear combo gives is equivalent to using a 55x11, which seems like more than enough for a rider that rarely contests the sprints.

At the lower end, the 50x33 combo gives a gear ratio of just 1.51 although reports say that Vingegaard has also used a 10-36T cassette.

The benefits of 1x

2023 Cervelo Dauphine 1x Jonas Vingegaard - 3.jpeg

> Lightweight v aero: which is best?

As we mentioned earlier, a 1x setup does bring plenty of benefits, especially to pro teams looking for every marginal gain. For example, there’s the potential aero benefit of removing the front mech and, in Jumbo-Visma's case, replacing it with a Wolf Tooth Lone Wolf Aero chainguide. For me or you this would probably be negligible, but for the pros who spend most of their races averaging more than 40kph, small changes can result in small savings.

In addition SRAM says you can also achieve a better chain line, which might offer better efficiency than a more traditional 2x setup.

They say every pro has a con and that is most likely the case here as it will mean that when not climbing, more time will also be spent down in that 10T cog. The smaller the sprocket, the greater the drivetrain losses. You win some, you lose some...

2023 Cervelo Dauphine 1x Jonas Vingegaard - 3 (1).jpeg

> 8 cheap ways to get a lighter bike — save a kilo or more

Of course, the main reason we suspect Vingegaard has opted to use this set-up is weight.

Not only can you get rid of the front mech, which is 170g including the battery, but you also lose the inner chainring which is another 40g or so. A SRAM spokesperson told us that this means Vingegaard can race on an aero bike (Cervelo S5) that weighs similar to his climbing bike (Cervelo R5). 

That ain’t right

WhatsApp Image 2023-06-06 at 12.03.01.jpg

One other feature of Vingegaard's bike caught our attention at the Dauphiné and that’s the shifters.

Whilst the rest of the team rides around on the taller current generation Red AXS hoods, Vingegaard’s bike has shifters that resemble the later Rival or Force AXS with a much lower profile.

Could these be shifters off a new generation of Red groupset? We wouldn’t mind betting that the new Red groupset will indeed follow this design language, but the larger shifter buttons lead us to believe that these are just modified Force levers with fancy graphics and perhaps a few internal weight savings.

Is 2023 the year that 1x rules the peloton?

Jonas Vingegaard (A.S.O./Aurélien Vialatte)
A.S.O./Aurélien Vialatte

With Vingegaard and Van Aert using it at the Tour de France, 1x's profile has already been boosted. Like it or not, 1x has become a feature of road racing, and perhaps it's here to stay this time. The dawn of 12-speed groupsets has meant that 1x is inevitable, as gear jumps get smaller whilst still providing pro riders with just about enough range.

That said, don't expect every pro rider to be jumping ship from the double chainset. We expect to see 1x being used more often but certainly not on every stage. Yet...

Let us know if you’d consider a 1x road bike down in the comments section below

Jamie has been riding bikes since a tender age but really caught the bug for racing and reviewing whilst studying towards a master's in Mechanical engineering at Swansea University. Having graduated, he decided he really quite liked working with bikes and is now a full-time addition to the road.cc team. When not writing about tech news or working on the Youtube channel, you can still find him racing local crits trying to cling on to his cat 2 licence...and missing every break going...

Add new comment

49 comments

Avatar
Global Nomad | 1 year ago
2 likes

We all know that the pro bike / race situation is very different than consumer sitautions, so odd that articles are still over-relating the two....thought we had got past that. Having a setup changed or tuned by a race mechanic everyday for a specific stage and rider takes these conversations far from the amateur consumer, even race support and changing wheels has no relevance to us.  I am interested in race tech but less so for its realtionship to how we use bikes everyday - my choices are very different. 

Avatar
martfarg | 1 year ago
2 likes

There's lots of restrictions with 1x and I feel they're not user friendly. I've messed around with 1x using a 36t, 46t, 48t, 50t 52t and 54t on various bikes and now have to pick my bike for the terrain...definitely say that 1x is for a specific ride and not a utility bike situation

Avatar
matthewn5 | 1 year ago
2 likes

On the club ride on Sunday one of the riders lost her front mech changing. At the coffee stop I had a look. First I thought it had slipped down the front mech bracket, so we pulled it up and tightened up the bolt. No joy, it slipped down and behind the big ring again.

Then I noticed that the front mech mount itself was loose. It's on a fairly new bike, carbon frame, from a major manufacturer, and so they can offer a 1x model without a front mech, it's held on with two tiny M4 bolts with dome heads that I first thought were rivets. Tiny screws, bound to get loose.

So, pull off the front mech, tighten the two tiny bolts as best I could (marked '4 Nm', so not too tight without a torque wrench handy), and reinstall the front mech and adjust. It held up for the rest of the ride.

But the tiny screws didn't feel great, and front mechs handle some big forces, why build in a potential failure mode like this? Just rivet or weld the bracket on for 2x, or supply a 1x-only frame, don't muck about with a bound-to-fail system like a screwed-on front mech mount. /rant

Avatar
marmotte27 replied to matthewn5 | 1 year ago
3 likes

Not a problem with front mechs this incident though, is it, as they worked just fine for what 9 decades on metal frames.

P.S.: Thinking about it, is this what is actually happening, are we being saddled with all this disc brakes, electronic shifting, one-by and whatnot shit, because carbon is such a shit frame material?

Avatar
wycombewheeler replied to marmotte27 | 1 year ago
1 like

marmotte27 wrote:

Not a problem with front mechs this incident though, is it, as they worked just fine for what 9 decades on metal frames. P.S.: Thinking about it, is this what is actually happening, are we being saddled with all this disc brakes, electronic shifting, one-by and whatnot shit, because carbon is such a shit frame material?

40,000km on my 2016 felt Z5, no issues with the front mech mount, or any other issues with the frame. Ridden on some pretty shocking roads and even occasionally on unsealed surfaces, with few concessions to the material.

Carbon done right is just fine. Well maybe press fit bottom brackets are sub optimal. electronic shifting and hydraulic brakes are certainly not a result of carbon frames.

If anything hydraulic brakes are harder for frames, as the forces are no longer central and provide a twisting moment.

Of course one of these is at the fork and almost all bikes have carbon forks whether the frame is titianium, aluminium or carbon. Even the majority of steel frames come with carbon forks.

 

Avatar
IanEdward replied to marmotte27 | 1 year ago
3 likes

No, we're being saddled with all this shit because they've run out of other things to sell.

Road bikes were probably already pretty much perfected, I'd argue that wide yet still lightweight and supple tyres are the most significant advance in recent years, and we already had the tech to accommodate these.

Discs, Di2, 1x should have remained niche, expensive kit for people that really needed or wanted it, rather than becoming as rapidly ubiquitous as they have become. It wouldn't be so bad but each example requires a wholesale upgrade to your bike, tools and even maintenance routine etc. that previous new technology probably didn't, have you noticed how different shop workshops look now? My old shop workshop now looks like a scene from the matrix as they try to reboot electric gears and diagnose motors etc. etc. 😂

Avatar
SimoninSpalding replied to IanEdward | 1 year ago
0 likes

Ironically the move to wider tyres is the one thing that is causing me problems keeping my 2008 Colnago running. I can just about squeeze 25mm tubeless tyres in (max 70psi), but they are becoming more difficult to come by.

Avatar
lio replied to marmotte27 | 1 year ago
1 like

We're getting pushed to 1x not because carbon is a bad material but because engineering a good front derailleur is hard.

i don't think SRAM have ever cracked it.

SRAM are very good at making cassettes though.  If they move everyone over to 1x they can avoid poor front shifts and put all their design effort into electric rear mechs where they have an advantage.

Avatar
check12 | 1 year ago
4 likes

If jumbo can't get a Cervelo S5 down to 6.8kg with a 2x setup they need to get their drills out. Welcome to disc bloat weights 

Avatar
Simon E | 1 year ago
2 likes

"Is Vingegaard going 1x for the Tour de France?"

...

"for Stage 2 of the Dauphine, Vingegaard was back on a 2x setup."

So that's a no.

Failing to win the Dauphine if his single ring gearing is somehow inadequate (not small enough, big gaps or whatever the reason) is nothing compared to tossing away a Tour de France win.

"Like it or not, 1x is coming to the road"

It's already here, Trek women's team have already been running 1x since 2021 though interestingly Canyon//SRAM team appear to run 2x. This really is a bit of a weak article.

Roglic's 1x setup for the mountain TT to clinch the Giro was a great idea (though a 2x system could get the same or even lower gearing) but Adam Blythe had some choice words to say about 1x on the 3T for WorldTour racing.

Avatar
Miller | 1 year ago
2 likes

The Dauphine heads into real mountains in the next few days, I can't see Vingegaard sticking with 50 x 33 low gear for those. We will see.

I have used Ekar 1x13 a lot on road this year and for me that works very well. It does provide a decent low gear, 40 x 42.

Avatar
tubasti replied to Miller | 1 year ago
0 likes

What kind of jumps between gears are you getting on the slow end of the cassette?

Avatar
Miller replied to tubasti | 1 year ago
0 likes

Can't remember the exact ratios but I get on with them fine. The cassette is closely spaced on the fast gears, wider on the slow gears. My only quibble is I feel a slight gap around 30kph. I can live with that but obviously the real answer is 14 speed  1

Avatar
Secret_squirrel replied to tubasti | 1 year ago
0 likes

tubasti wrote:

What kind of jumps between gears are you getting on the slow end of the cassette?

Why would most recreational riders care?

Avatar
IanEdward replied to Secret_squirrel | 1 year ago
1 like

Define 'recreational'.

I'm a thoroughly mediocre, desk-jockey, family man who barely scrapes 4 or 5 hours riding a week.

But I ride as hard as my undertrained legs allow, and if you're pushing hard on a rolling section of road or up your local big climb, big gaps ARE annoying. Even in the garage mid-winter, with an 11-28 cassette on a 2x system trying to do basic sweetspot workouts, I always seem to be 'between' sprockets.

I'd say that anyone who enjoys the endorphins and fun of pushing hard, especially on a road bike, benefits from closer ratios.

Avatar
lio replied to Secret_squirrel | 1 year ago
1 like

Because when you're blowing out you're arse on a club run with a group you can only just keep up with being a gear that's slightly too high or too low could make all the difference.    3

Avatar
wycombewheeler replied to lio | 1 year ago
0 likes

lio wrote:

Because when you're blowing out you're arse on a club run with a group you can only just keep up with being a gear that's slightly too high or too low could make all the difference.    3

perhaps join a slower group more appropriate to your abilities? since if you can only just hang on as you describe, then you are not capable of taking a turn on the front.

Avatar
NickSprink replied to Miller | 1 year ago
0 likes

When I have looked at 1x for road I have felt that Ekar is the only useable option for us mere mortals where we need one set up for everything.

Avatar
wycombewheeler replied to Miller | 1 year ago
0 likes

Miller wrote:

The Dauphine heads into real mountains in the next few days, I can't see Vingegaard sticking with 50 x 33 low gear for those. We will see.

I have used Ekar 1x13 a lot on road this year and for me that works very well. It does provide a decent low gear, 40 x 42.

whats the fast gear though 40 x 9/10/11 even if the little sprocket is 9 teeth it's slower than a 2x system running 52x11

Pages

Latest Comments