Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

TECH NEWS

Updated: UCI officially suspends disc brake testing

… while bike industry insists disc brakes will still become an important part of road racing

The UCI, cycle sport’s world governing body, has confirmed that it has formally suspended the use of disc brakes in road racing, and the WFSGI, a body representing much of the bike industry, has reacted to this move.

We told you last night that reports were coming out suggested this was the case and now the UCI has issued this statement:

 

The Union Cycliste Internationale (UCI) today announces that it has decided to suspend, with immediate effect, the trial of disc brakes currently being carried out in road races.

This decision follows a request to do so made by the Association Internationale des Groupes Cyclistes Professionnels (AIGCP) – which represents all professional cycling teams – following the injuries suffered by Movistar Team rider Francisco Ventoso at Sunday’s Paris-Roubaix Classic. This request is supported by the Cyclistes Professionnels Associés (CPA), which represents riders.

The first tests of disc brakes were carried out in August and September 2015. UCI WorldTeams were given the possibility to test bikes mounted with these brakes at two events of their choice. After in-depth discussions with stakeholders, the UCI then decided to authorise riders from all categories of professional road teams to use disc brakes in 2016, and to closely monitor their use during the year.

The UCI will now continue its extensive consultations on this subject by way of its Equipment Commission, which is made up of representatives of teams, riders, mechanics, fans, commissaires and the bicycle industry – via the World Federation of the Sporting Goods Industry (WFSGI) – all the while reaffirming that rider security has always been and will always remain its absolute priority.

 

The UCI has not put a timescale on how long this consultation process is likely to take or given any indication as to the precise content of these discussions.

Merida Scultura Disc 2016 launch - 4.jpg

We’ve been in contact with the WFSGI. That body, which represents many of the biggest brands in the bike industry as well as brands from the wider sports world, told us that it would release an official statement soon.

There’s no doubt that the big bike brands want to sell disc brake equipped road bikes and they clearly use the pro peloton as a shop window for their high-end race products.

Team Roompot Isaac Element SL Disc.jpg

On the other hand, it wouldn’t do them any good at all for riders to be seen to be injured as a result of using disc brakes, so it’ll be interesting to see how the WFSGI reacts. We’re expecting a review of the evidence and an examination of whether disc brakes can be made less likely to cause damage in the event of a crash.

Check out our article: Have disc brakes really led to injuries in peloton? 

The reaction from the WFSGI has just come in. Again, we'll print the statement in full.

 

The WFSGI, as representative body of the bicycle industry, would like to make a statement on its position regarding the suspension of the trial of disc brakes in road racing.

Following the accident which happened to Spanish rider Francisco Ventoso from Team Movistar last Sunday at Paris-Roubaix, the UCI has decided to suspend the trial of disc brakes in road racing with immediate effect. The WFSGI would like to clearly state that the safety of riders has equally highest priority for the industry.

WFSGI Secretary General Robbert de Kock said: “The suspension was decided by the UCI for safety reasons and can be supported therefore. Nevertheless the WFSGI asks the UCI to immediately start the collaboration with all stakeholders on the future of disc brakes and safety in road racing.”

As a base for any future decisions, the WFSGI requests the UCI do a full investigation on the accident happened at Paris-Roubaix on Sunday. The WFSGI supports clear and proper investigations and analysis of such accidents and making important decisions for several stakeholders in road racing based on the results of them. The WFSGI already expressed its full support to the UCI for any collaboration which will appropriately manage the risks associated with all aspects in road racing.

The industry is confident that disc brakes continue to be one of the products of the future and will become an important part of road racing."

 

This one looks set to run and run.

Mat has been in cycling media since 1996, on titles including BikeRadar, Total Bike, Total Mountain Bike, What Mountain Bike and Mountain Biking UK, and he has been editor of 220 Triathlon and Cycling Plus. Mat has been road.cc technical editor for over a decade, testing bikes, fettling the latest kit, and trying out the most up-to-the-minute clothing. He has won his category in Ironman UK 70.3 and finished on the podium in both marathons he has run. Mat is a Cambridge graduate who did a post-grad in magazine journalism, and he is a winner of the Cycling Media Award for Specialist Online Writer. Now over 50, he's riding road and gravel bikes most days for fun and fitness rather than training for competitions.

Add new comment

55 comments

Avatar
Mungecrundle | 8 years ago
0 likes

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/fil...

2014 accident stats from the Dep't for Transport. Plenty of nuggets here to support many sides of the argument and of course it's very difficult to prove a correlation between cause and effect outside of the reproducible lab controlled experiment. However, my reading is that even though overall numbers killed are now lower, cyclists are the only group for whom current overall casualty rates have increased since the 2005 - 2009 baseline figures even after taking account of increased cycle miles over that time.

Personally I don't discount theories of increased risk taking being a result of an increased perception of personal safety and that has to quite literally impact on vulnerable road users. However I would also contend that whereas most of the current improvements in car design and safety features are for the benefit of passengers in those vehicles or to put it another way, systems that help reduce injury in the event of an accident, that the newer technologies are being developed to avoid collisions in the first place, and that has to be better news for vulnerable road users.

If nothing else, the continued (relatively) high incidence of pedal cyclist injuries should be used as a stick to beat the road planners and to demand better Police enforcement of speed limits, mobile phone usage, close passes and other stupidity / aggression occuring on our roads. At the same time, it's still obviously dangerous enough out there to take a few precautions, so I'll be continuing to use my lights and hi viz as part of my overall survival strategy.

Avatar
imajez | 8 years ago
0 likes

If you prefer rims brakes for aesthetics or extra fractional weight saving that's just fine as they are good valid reason. But please do not come out with flat earth claptrap that they work just as well. They. Do. Not.  

When testing various road bikes last year I found the perfect bike. Light, perfect fit, very comfy and oh so very fast. Luckily it rained lightly during the ride and I quickly remembered how reallly, really crap rim brakes are in the wet. Did the same route straight after with a heavier bike [not because of the discs BTW] and had zero issue stopping.
I also rode Col De la Madone shortly after on a lovely light road bike and sadly had to descend the very twisty road quite cautiously in the very hot and dry conditions. Why? The rim brakes were so inferior to discs, they simply could not slow me enough. I would have descended faster on my mountain bikes.
V- brakes are way more powerful and effective than the caliper brakes that one person claimed were so much better than canti brakes that discs were unnecessary and yet V-brakes vanished from mountain bikes. I've ridden the Alps off road quite happily with v-brakes, as they are very good indeed. But and this is a big but, it was bone dry at the time.

I rode road bikes before I got an MTB and yet like many MTBers, now I will not buy a road bike with braking from the last ecentury. I live somewhere with lots of steep hills and with this being the UK it can rain heavily at any time of the year and being able to brake consistently, controllably and powerfully is a must. My girlfriend's road bike which I also ride at times is lovely and fast, except for downhills where I dare not go the speed I do on a road bike with discs because it simply has nowhere near the stopping power, so can be a  tad scary to ride as a result.

 

Avatar
700c replied to imajez | 8 years ago
0 likes
imajez wrote:

I rode road bikes before I got an MTB and yet like many MTBers, now I will not buy a road bike with braking from the last ecentury.

 

Great. Each to his own eh?!

Some of us -and you'll like this - have gears you change mechanically with levers as well!

Luddites the lot of us, with our inferior 20th century technology! We should all remember to be fearful and cautious the next time we encounter a descent without the latest disc technology. We must be out of our tiny minds. It's a miracle we're all still alive!

Avatar
imajez replied to 700c | 8 years ago
1 like

700c wrote:
imajez wrote:

I rode road bikes before I got an MTB and yet like many MTBers, now I will not buy a road bike with braking from the last ecentury.

 

Great. Each to his own eh?! Some of us -and you'll like this - have gears you change mechanically with levers as well! Luddites the lot of us, with our inferior 20th century technology! We should all remember to be fearful and cautious the next time we encounter a descent without the latest disc technology. We must be out of our tiny minds. It's a miracle we're all still alive!

 

Good of you to not quote the relevent parts of my post to make your non-point. 
It's really easy to think you've won a debate when you simply  avoid the points actually being made.
You'd make a wonderful politician.

Avatar
700c replied to imajez | 8 years ago
0 likes

imajez wrote:

700c wrote:
imajez wrote:

I rode road bikes before I got an MTB and yet like many MTBers, now I will not buy a road bike with braking from the last ecentury.

 

Great. Each to his own eh?! Some of us -and you'll like this - have gears you change mechanically with levers as well! Luddites the lot of us, with our inferior 20th century technology! We should all remember to be fearful and cautious the next time we encounter a descent without the latest disc technology. We must be out of our tiny minds. It's a miracle we're all still alive!

 

Good of you to not quote the relevent parts of my post to make your non-point. 
It's really easy to think you've won a debate when you simply  avoid the points actually being made.
You'd make a wonderful politician.

 

LOL. Your post was quite long, hence why I didn't quote all of it and respond point by point. My point was that you were scaremongering about rim brakes and implying those who prefer using them on road bikes are somewhat backward, but here goes the long version:!

imajez wrote:

please do not come out with flat earth claptrap that they work just as well. They. Do. Not.  

true, discs probably stop you quicker, particularly in the wet, but not everyone agrees with that point, ergo they must be backward and believe the earth is flat?! You neglect to address the nuances of why people may prefer rim brakes on road bikes and it's not simply to do with aesthetics. I refer you to my earlier post but also note that the maintenance, set up and compatibility implications of discs may also affect how well people percieve they 'work' with their equipment when making buying decisions.

imajez wrote:

When testing various road bikes last year I found the perfect bike. Light, perfect fit, very comfy and oh so very fast. Luckily it rained lightly during the ride and I quickly remembered how reallly, really crap rim brakes are in the wet. Did the same route straight after with a heavier bike [not because of the discs BTW] and had zero issue stopping. 

could have been down to many factors, not just the brakes. Maybe rider skill played a part? Agreed that disc brakes will stop you more easily in the wet, though the difference will be more marked on a mountain bike than on a road bike, since the limits of grip are higher, particularly in the wet, with wider tyres.

imajez wrote:

I also rode Col De la Madone shortly after on a lovely light road bike and sadly had to descend the very twisty road quite cautiously in the very hot and dry conditions. Why? The rim brakes were so inferior to discs, they simply could not slow me enough. I would have descended faster on my mountain bikes.

I daresay rider skill, experience or confidence  was also a limiting factor, as well as perhaps the brake type, sorry. Possibly poor equipment too from what you've described here? Not all rim brakes are the same of course.  Descending abilities vary widely amongst us and amongst the pros -  I assume you've seen riders such as Nibali, Sagan or Evans descend quickly and confidently on rim brakes using the best equipment available to them.  An extreme example, of course, but illustrates that rim brakes can be used effectively to descend fast and confidently and may not be the limiting factor you describe in all cases.

imajez wrote:

V- brakes are way more powerful and effective than the caliper brakes that one person claimed were so much better than canti brakes that discs were unnecessary and yet V-brakes vanished from mountain bikes. I've ridden the Alps off road quite happily with v-brakes, as they are very good indeed. But and this is a big but, it was bone dry at the time.

I've had brake cables snap on v braked mountain bikes under hard braking. Not all v brakes/ disc brakes/ caliper brakes/  are equal and this is a generalisation.

imajez wrote:

I rode road bikes before I got an MTB and yet like many MTBers, now I will not buy a road bike with braking from the last ecentury.

yes I've ridden both and enjoy the disc brakes on mountain bikes for that type of riding. Each to his own though and you should respect individual choice.  Your refusal to use 'braking technology from the last century' suggests you might also reject anything that's not the latest tech, hence my facetious comment about electronic shifting etc. 

imajez wrote:

I live somewhere with lots of steep hills and with this being the UK it can rain heavily at any time of the year and being able to brake consistently, controllably and powerfully is a must.

 

I respect your choice and priorities when choosing equipment. I've never had particular problems stopping in the wet but no doubt discs would be better for bringing you to a stop. There are compromises and cost implications, however, as above.

imajez wrote:

My girlfriend's road bike which I also ride at times is lovely and fast, except for downhills where I dare not go the speed I do on a road bike with discs because it simply has nowhere near the stopping power, so can be a  tad scary to ride as a result.

 

You tend to get used to your equipment over time , again with this comes confidence, skill etc.  It doesn't follow that all caliper brakes are crap because you are nervous when using them.

Avatar
matthewn5 | 8 years ago
0 likes

Quote:

To take the example of the motor car: 'teching' your way out of trouble has coincided with a rather considerable reduction in road traffic related casualties amongst all groups of road users.

What happened as they made cars 'safer' is that drivers took more risks, resulting in more vulnerable road users being killed. That in turn made people think cycling was dangerous, and that letting their kids walk to school was dangerous. So it wasn't all great.

Avatar
mattydubster | 8 years ago
0 likes

My discs look lovely on my bike  1

Avatar
Mungecrundle | 8 years ago
1 like

SP,

To take the example of the motor car: 'teching' your way out of trouble has coincided with a rather considerable reduction in road traffic related casualties amongst all groups of road users. All cars now come equipped with safety devices from the humble seat belt, airbags and ABS equipped disc brakes to a myriad of unseen electronic driver aids such as traction and stability control. Some newer vehicles can be ordered with radar controlled collision avoidance systems. Even if you feel you don't need such aids I'd much rather you (and everyone else) did have them. Whilst I agree wholeheartedly with your premise that responsibility for the vehicle rests with the driver and commend your attitude in relation to being constantly aware of the car's ability to injure and kill, I hold out no such hope for the majority of fallible human beings in possession of a driving licence. Personally I welcome every advance that allows for the vehicle to mitigate a potential incident and look forward to the widespread use of self driving vehicles and all the 'driver aid' spin off technologies along the way.

As to the disc brakes on my bicycle? Well the way I look at it is that my bike needed some method of stopping and discs were a small premium cost over conventional rim brakes, plus I think that discs look pretty cool and I really do like my carbon rims and hate seeing them all scuffed up. But ultimately, if in the expected 10 or so years that I own the bike they allow me to stop a bit sooner just once in a critical situation, then they have earned their place. And yes they most definitely do allow me to stop quicker. I really do recommend that you try them when you come to replace your current bike, I think you would actually enjoy the extra finesse and control.

Avatar
Morat | 8 years ago
0 likes

What does it matter to anyone outside the pro-peloton if they use cheezy watsits as brakes next year?

Unless you're the sort of saddo that dresses up in full team strip to match your bike, just ride what you like and to hell with trying to emulate the pros. All the good new stuff will still arrive on bikes you can buy, it's just that in this case it came via MTBs instead of the TdF.

As for disk brakes looking ugly, that's a personal opinion. Not one I share.

Anyway, I've got disk brakes on my "road" bike and Vs on my MTB. Do I care? no.

Avatar
Fish_n_Chips | 8 years ago
1 like

Is that rider going to return to racing or is he permanently out?

 

Disc guards? How heavy are they? Aero? Blown about in high winds? Some new challenges to overcome  or use rim brakes.

Avatar
wingsofspeed68 | 8 years ago
2 likes

Call me a luddite but Disc brakes should never have been allowed on road bikes in the first place. The stopping power of modern calliper brakes on road bikes has been exceptional now for a long time. Just try a vintage 531 frame with centre pull brakes and compare. Disc brakes just make a road bike look ugly. 

Avatar
Initialised replied to wingsofspeed68 | 8 years ago
0 likes

wingsofspeed68 wrote:

Call me a luddite but Disc brakes should never have been allowed on road bikes in the first place. The stopping power of modern calliper brakes on road bikes has been exceptional now for a long time. Just try a vintage 531 frame with centre pull brakes and compare. Disc brakes just make a road bike look ugly. 

Luddite!

Rim brakes get to 70% traction before locking up, discs can get to 90% with standard calipers and higher with quad piston calipers (Saint/Zee)

RT99's are about as bling as Rotors get (and they look awesome on my road bike).

Avatar
Mungecrundle | 8 years ago
2 likes

Superpython, by your own admission you are a superior cyclist and car driver to all around you. Whilst of course we would all aspire to the infallible standard that you set, would you allow us lesser beings the benefit of superior / slightly more idiot friendly technologies to make up for our lack of ability?

Avatar
italianbikesnob | 8 years ago
2 likes

Whether Francisco Ventoso was actually injured by a disc or not is missing the point. However looking at the pics I have never seen that type of slice on a cyclist before - having been in more than a few bunch spills in my time.

Crashes in the peleton are an (unfortunate) reality and a much more serious (apologies to FV) injury would be inevitable were the UCI to allow the continued use of discs.

Or introduce leathers to the peleton. Rapha would clean up...

Avatar
herrow | 8 years ago
0 likes

There is no absolute proof it was caused by a disc, it was 'possibly' caused by a disc brake rotor.

Put a bunch of people on bikes racing closely at x miles an hour and anything can happen disc brakes or no disc brakes there will be something that hurts you. Disc rotors definately aren't "razor sharp" as some keep mentioning, ran my finger firmly round the edge of my rotors on my planet x London Road  and (I know they weren't spinning at x miles per hour, but apparently neither was the rider who had "stopped" in front of Francisco) there was no way I could cut my finger. I have no doubt slamming into a disc rotor would hurt like hell and could very well badly injure a rider the same way other parts of the bike could but I'm very suspicious of his injury, he doesn't even really know for definate that is what hurt him, he just thinks it is and is jumping to conclusions. 

In all my years working on my bikes the only time I have hurt/cut myself is when dealing with the cassette and chainrings, they really are like razors! bang into those and they sink in a slice!

I had a rim brake road bike before discs and wet weather performance was never good when dealing with cars pulling out in front, now my discs provide me with consistently great performance in all weather and give me the confidence I can stop when I need to.

I do think that more research should be done before re-introducing discs to the peleton to put peoples minds at ease but at the end of the day it should be up to the rider. They aren't always in a bunch, If they feel safer with discs hurtling down a mountain in the wet than with calipers then let them have discs. 

Anyway I'm just happy to ride no matter what brakes I have on my bike.

Avatar
supermarioracer | 8 years ago
2 likes

 

 

Avatar
Sniffer | 8 years ago
6 likes

The decision the UCI had to make is not about whether disc brakes are a good thing or not.  It is only tangentally about whether they are safe or not.  It is also not that important whether the injuries from P-R are caused by a disc or not.

As someone who manages a workforce in a hazardous industry one thing you learn quickly is that if you don't take your people with you when you make a change then it gets difficult very quickly.  While the riders in the pro-peleton are not exactly UCI employees it seems clear that they have not bought into the idea that discs will provide them an advantage.  If they did they would be rushing to adopt them, safety concerns or not.  The trials of the last few months don't appear to have sold it to them either.  So if the riders are collectively saying no, I don't think continuing with the trial was sustainable.  A time out to re-evaluate and make the performance arguement to the riders seems sensible.

None of this has much bearing on the whether any of the rest of us who are not racing should ride road bikes with discs.

Avatar
700c | 8 years ago
3 likes

I don't see what the problem is. What's right for the pro's might not apply to the rest of us - there's no need to be so defensive about it!

The problem I have with manufacturers pushing discs is that it requires a LOT of investment to 'upgrade'. (Ditto 11 speed to a lesser degree). You don't just stick on new brakes, you basically upgrade the whole bike for discs. Fine for those making a first time purchase but I'm heavily invested in rim brakes in my equipment - frames, wheels etc.

Staying on rim brakes for the forseeable doesn't make me a luddite, nor does holding the view that they aren't necessary. There are indeed downsides in weight, aerodynamics etc (remember the industry is still pushing those, too!) Sure, they're likely to be better in raw stopping power and in wet conditions. If that's important to you then you should invest.

There's a regular twisty descent close to home ending in a T junction, requiring heavy braking usually to zero. It's on the majority of my rides by necessity. Last night Garmin showed deceleration from a max of 48.5mph to 0mph. I weigh 89kg+bike and had no problems at all stopping. Perhaps (probably) I'd have stopped a bit quicker with discs. But it's not much of a limiting factor on my overall times or even my safety.. fitness and technique certainly are though!!

Avatar
wycombewheeler replied to 700c | 8 years ago
3 likes

700c wrote:

Staying on rim brakes for the forseeable doesn't make me a luddite, nor does holding the view that they aren't necessary. There are indeed downsides in weight, aerodynamics etc (remember the industry is still pushing those, too!) Sure, they're likely to be better in raw stopping power and in wet conditions.

Can't argue with that, even as a disc fan I am happy to keep rim brakes on my summer bike, and would not consider changing a bike in order to upgrade. as you say you can't retrofit discs to a non disc bike.  (although I did have a mountain bike back in the day with lugs for v brakes AND disc brake mounting points.)

I do not stop riding just because it's wet tough, and I like

a) my stopping distance to be broadly similar regardless of weather

b) expensive wheels not to be considered consumables because of all the crap picked up by the rim in the wet gouging the rim when the brakes are applied.

 

700c wrote:

I don't see what the problem is. What's right for the pro's might not apply to the rest of us - there's no need to be so defensive about it!

 

except when people in the cycling clubs start equating he group ride to he peleton and pushing againt disc brakes

Avatar
Mario29 | 8 years ago
2 likes

I agree with the WFSGI to have a full investigation of the accident.

Afterall, there is a big allegation hanging in the air that disc brakes were at fault but it is not followed up by any logical explanation of Ventoso's claims in his statement. (questions about cut in the wrong shape, on the wrong leg?)

I also agree that disc brakes are not necessarily needed, afterall everyone was able to race before disc brakes and was able to stop in the wet and so on and so forth...

However, it doesn't negate the fact that you can brake better and quicker with disc brakes,even on road bikes. Some might find this to be important, others don't....

Avatar
rabbot | 8 years ago
0 likes

I leaned disc rotor gurad is already exist for the people paly bike polo.

http://www.fixcraft.de/collections/frontpage/products/disc-rotor-guard

Racers just can use  carbon version of this. 

Sponsors will be happy to have another expensive carbon piece with brand logo.

Avatar
Villiers | 8 years ago
3 likes

Sure they could be covered with a lightweight carbon cover and have ducted air for cooling .

Avatar
Butty replied to Villiers | 8 years ago
2 likes

Villiers wrote:

Sure they could be covered with a lightweight carbon cover and have ducted air for cooling .

Form the disc with a tee shaped profile on edge and have the piston body with a channel for the profile to travel through?

Edit <<curses - the pads or wheelscan't be easily removed then>

 

Avatar
belgravedave | 8 years ago
1 like

Am loving this debate, lets stick some buzzsaws on bikes in a pelaton. I'm trying to think of another sport where it's governing body has tried to make it more dangerous. Maybe FIA Group B cars in the 80's.

Avatar
Batchy | 8 years ago
2 likes

As I've stated before disc brakes will not stop crashes or pile ups. Riders reaction times and handling skills are far more important. Why introduce bacon slicers on top of the weaponry that bikes already have seems insane to me!

Avatar
wycombewheeler replied to Batchy | 8 years ago
0 likes
Batchy wrote:

As I've stated before disc brakes will not stop crashes or pile ups. Riders reaction times and handling skills are far more important. Why introduce bacon slicers on top of the weaponry that bikes already have seems insane to me!

Yes it is reaction times and sudden braking that cause crashes, but that didn't stop people making the argument at first that it wasn't safe to have different levels of braking in the peleton, even though others were arguing that it makes no difference ad rim brakes are good enough.

Now the argument is that the discs themselves are unsafe in a crash despite bikes being covered in sharp and pointy parts, and the jury still being out on the cause of the injury.

It's a shame all the antis didn't get aligned on sharp edges to begin with, maybe they might have been able to effect the manufacturers to create discs with smoother edges.

Too busy screaming witchcraft.

I remember in the 90s people saying v brakes were good enough and discs were unnecessary, now you don't see an MTB without them.

Avatar
Vili Er | 8 years ago
2 likes

It's been a great couple of days. The anti disc gang feel smug / vindicated and the pro disc brigade are furiously paddling (or is that pedalling?).

 

 

Avatar
Russell Orgazoid replied to Vili Er | 8 years ago
1 like

Bigringrider wrote:

It's been a great couple of days. The anti disc gang feel smug / vindicated and the pro disc brigade are furiously paddling (or is that pedalling?).

Get out more. You are sad.

 

Avatar
Vili Er replied to Russell Orgazoid | 8 years ago
2 likes

Plasterer's Radio wrote:

Bigringrider wrote:

It's been a great couple of days. The anti disc gang feel smug / vindicated and the pro disc brigade are furiously paddling (or is that pedalling?).

Get out more. You are sad.

 

 

I know, tell me about it! I've only managed about 170 miles so far this week. It's making me depressed  2 

Avatar
Russell Orgazoid replied to Vili Er | 8 years ago
1 like

Bigringrider wrote:

Plasterer's Radio wrote:

Bigringrider wrote:

It's been a great couple of days. The anti disc gang feel smug / vindicated and the pro disc brigade are furiously paddling (or is that pedalling?).

Get out more. You are sad.

 

 

I know, tell me about it! I've only managed about 170 miles so far this week. It's making me depressed  2 

"Betamax v VHS"

LOL. Well done you.

Pages

Latest Comments