Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

review

Princeton CarbonWorks Wake 6560 Disc Tune Wheelset

8
£3,199.99

VERDICT:

8
10
Big money, but impressive ride quality and performance gains in the real world
Light for a deep-section wheel
Copes well with winds of all angles
Impressive aero qualities
Freehub lacks a bite guard
Some tough competition at lower prices
Weight: 
1,540g

At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works. Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.

What the road.cc scores mean

Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.

  • Exceptional
  • Excellent
  • Very Good
  • Good
  • Quite good
  • Average
  • Not so good
  • Poor
  • Bad
  • Appalling

The Princeton CarbonWorks Wake 6560 wheelset looks quirky, but it certainly delivers on performance, handling... well, pretty much everything really. It just comes down to whether you can justify the price.

Thanks to their looks, the Wake 6560 wheels are guaranteed to be a conversation starter, with the first question being, 'Does the wavy pattern work?' My honest answer is, it's hard to tell outside of a wind tunnel.

> Find your nearest dealer here

> Buy these online here

The Wake pattern took four years of development, and what you are left with is a rim that contains 24 sinusoidal oscillations, giving a variable depth of 60mm and 65mm, which should make it more aerodynamic and less of a handful handling-wise over a large range of crosswind angles.

2021 Princeton Wake 6560 Discbrake Wheelset - rim 2.jpg

The Wakes still catch the wind – go past a gateway after being sheltered by the wind and you can feel the wheel take a slap from a sidewind – but considering the depth, it isn't as bad as some other deep-section rims I've used, and they react to your input quickly and without fuss. And with winds coming from any angle apart from fully side on, they are barely affected.

Some deep-section rims can also feel like they are stalling at certain wind angles, especially when you get out of the saddle. I never got any of that from the 6560s.

2021 Princeton Wake 6560 Discbrake Wheelset - rim 3.jpg

In fact, the Wakes are surprisingly easy to live with in all kinds of conditions, making them suitable for more than just time trials or triathlons.

Their weight of 1,540g is impressive for such a deep wheelset, which means that they climb well, so you're getting a boost on the way up and the aero advantage on the way down.

2021 Princeton Wake 6560 Discbrake Wheelset - 2.jpg

When it comes to travelling at speed there is a noticeable difference to how much effort you need to put in to keep the wheels spinning, especially in the sweet spot of between 20 and 30mph, compared to something with a much shallower rim.

I wouldn't say they feel faster or easier to keep at a specific speed than the 62.5mm-deep Swiss Side Hadron 652 aero wheels, but that's not a criticism as I found the Hadrons a very efficient set of wheels.

road bike wheels

One of my well-used testing routes is an out-and-back covering 35 miles. In fact, it's my old commute done in one go, and a trip I have done thousands of times over the years in every type of weather condition. There isn't a whole lot of climbing – five or six longish drags – with the majority of it fast and relatively smooth A-road with a lot of traffic: a perfect testing ground for the Wakes.

With quite a few traffic lights and roundabouts dotted on the main trunk road section, there are plenty of bits where you are mixing it with stop/start traffic, and it can require instant hard accelerations to maintain your primary position.

This is where the Wakes really showed their stiffness levels and how that works with the low weight. Under some very hard efforts there was no feeling of any flex or waste of energy, and they are quick to transfer that energy into forward motion.

2021 Princeton Wake 6560 Discbrake Wheelset - rim 1.jpg

Then, once you are up to speed, like I said earlier, you aren't having to work so hard to maintain your speed. It makes it easier to close gaps to get into the slipstream of an HGV as it labours away from the lights as well.

Comfort levels are also good. Deep-section wheels have a lot of material in the rims and this can lead to a harsh ride, but you don't get any of that here.

The 18mm internal rim isn't that wide compared with the latest standards (26mm external), so I went with a 25mm tyre, the Pirelli P-Zero Race that I used on the Hadron 625, which gave an excellent profile.

2021 Princeton Wake 6560 Discbrake Wheelset - rim bed.jpg

Pumped up to 100psi they obviously give you a firm ride (which I like), but it's not one that batters you about or feels uncomfortable. The BMC Teammachine SLR Two I was using them on has quite a firm ride too.

2021 Princeton Wake 6560 Discbrake Wheelset - rim bed valve hole.jpg

If you like your pressures lower, then you're going to benefit even more from the comfort levels afforded by the Wakes.

Fitting the tubeless tyres wasn't an issue either. A bit of a snug fit, which required a tyre lever to get the last section onto the hooked rim, but I'm fine with that. It gives a bit of reassurance that they aren't likely to blow off at high pressures.

Using a standard Topeak Joe Blow track pump they 'popped' onto the rim without issue and sealed quickly. Removal was just as easy, which is what you want just in case you need to fit a tube at the side of the road if your sealant can't fix the puncture.

Tune hubs

When it comes to the build, the Princetons are available in a few hub options. Ours are running 24-hole Tune King (front) and Kong (rear) which run absolutely beautifully. They spin up effortlessly and just keep spinning.

The test period has been a bit of a mixed bag when it comes to the weather, and these wheels have seen it all: rain, sleet, hail and some dry, dusty lanes.

2021 Princeton Wake 6560 Discbrake Wheelset - front hub.jpg

I've had them for about six weeks which is a relatively short time for testing the durability of the hubs, but I haven't found any issues with them. The only thing I would say is that the freehub body is a little on the soft side. It's aluminium alloy and has no steel reinforcing strip, which allows the cassette to cut in under high loads like when pulling away from a standing start in a high gear. Something worth keeping an eye on.

2021 Princeton Wake 6560 Discbrake Wheelset - rear hub.jpg

The hubs use a Centerlock design for attaching your brake rotors.

Other than that, durability of the whole wheelset is impressive. The beauty of testing wheels like these is that I don't have to treat them with kid gloves like I might if I'd splashed out my own cash. That's not to say I try to wreck them, but they've seen the odd pothole at speed and been taken down a few gravel byways to see how they get on. The rims, hubs and Sapim CX Ray spokes all came away unscathed.

Value

When it comes to the pricing, they ain't cheap! This build comes in at £3,199.99 a pair, which to start with I couldn't get my head round. The Swiss Side wheels I mentioned earlier are £1,920, for example.

Then again, Zipp released its 454 NSW a little while back with its Sawtooth technology, which isn't a million miles away from the idea that PCW is using here, and a set of Zipps will set you back around £3,570 at full rrp.

> Buyer’s Guide: 33 of the best disc brake road wheelsets

For some stiff competition you have to consider the Hunt Limitless Aero Disc wheelsets. I tested the 48s and they're an unbelievably fast set of wheels. They're heavier than the Wakes by a good 150g, but to be honest that's barely noticeable out on the road.

Hunt has now released a 60mm version which I'm desperate to test. They are priced at £1,429 with CeramicSpeed bearings, or £1,169 with EZO steel bearings. That's a very good price.

Conclusion

Summing it all up, the Wakes are an impressive set of wheels. Deep-section rims that behave themselves, allowing anyone to exploit them not just racers, and you don't have to stay away from the climbs either. It is a big outlay, but from what I can tell so far, they will make your riding very enjoyable and will just absorb the miles without issue.

Verdict

Big money, but impressive ride quality and performance gains in the real world

road.cc test report

Make and model: Princeton CarbonWorks WAKE 6560 Disc Tune Wheelset

Size tested: 60-65mm deep (variable); internal rim width 18mm, external 26mm

Tell us what the wheel is for and who it's aimed at. What do the manufacturers say about it? How does that compare to your own feelings about it?

Princeton CarbonWorks says, "Advanced aerospace engineering facilitates better speed through the breakthrough of dynamic cross-section variability – WAKE – which yields lower drag and reduced effects of vortex shedding. Optimized mechanical design paired with advanced manufacturing increases stress distribution and enables weight reduced layup schedule. Laced to your choice of ultra-light TUNE or bombproof White Industries.

'Princeton CarbonWorks WAKE 6560 breaks industry benchmarks and forces discerning riders to recalibrate aerodynamic, strength, stability and weight expectations. In 4 years of research and development WAKE was wind tunnel confirmed, road tested, gravel verified and race proven, join us and leave the competition in your wake."

In terms of performance, the Wakes perform very well indeed.

Tell us some more about the technical aspects of the wheel?

Princeton CarbonWorks lists:

Internal Rim Width

18mm

Max Rim Width

26mm

Max Rim Depth

65mm

Min Rim Depth

60mm

Spokes

Sapim® CX-Ray®

Nipples

Sapim® Secure Lock

Spoke Count

24/24

Hub Type

TUNE, King/Kong

Rate the wheel for quality of construction:
 
8/10
Rate the wheel for performance:
 
9/10

Impressive aero gains and plenty of stiffness without sacrificing comfort.

Rate the wheel for durability:
 
8/10
Rate the wheel for weight
 
8/10

Impressive for such a deep-section rim.

Rate the wheel for value:
 
5/10

Did the wheels stay true? Any issues with spoke tension?

Trueness was not an issue.

How easy did you find it to fit tyres?

A good snug fit but no major issues when it came to fitting or removing tyres.

How did the wheel extras (eg skewers and rim tape) perform?

Tubeless valves and wheel bags are included, which all work fine.

Tell us how the wheel performed overall when used for its designed purpose

For a deep-section wheel it is surprisingly versatile.

Tell us what you particularly liked about the wheel

Impressive aero performance.

Tell us what you particularly disliked about the wheel

The Tune freehub could do with a steel strip to stop the cassette cutting in.

How does the price compare to that of similar products in the market, including ones recently tested on road.cc?

There are some really good aero wheels out there which also offer impressive handling for a lot less money, like the Hunts and Swiss Sides I've mentioned in the review. But the Princetons come in quite a chunk cheaper than something like the Zipp 454 NSW.

Did you enjoy using the wheel? Yes

Would you consider buying the wheel? Yes

Would you recommend the wheel to a friend? Yes

Use this box to explain your overall score

Over three grand is a big outlay for a set of wheels, but the Wake 6560s do deliver on the performance front and build quality is excellent. The only real quibble I'd say is that slightly soft freehub body.

Overall rating: 8/10

About the tester

Age: 42  Height: 180cm  Weight: 76kg

I usually ride: This month's test bike  My best bike is: B'Twin Ultra CF draped in the latest bling test components

I've been riding for: Over 20 years  I ride: Every day  I would class myself as: Expert

I regularly do the following types of riding: time trialling, commuting, club rides, sportives, fixed/singlespeed,

Since writing his first bike review for road.cc back in early 2009 senior product reviewer Stu has tested more than a thousand pieces of kit, and hundreds of bikes.

With an HND in mechanical engineering and previous roles as a CNC programmer/machinist, draughtsman and development engineer (working in new product design) Stu understands what it takes to bring a product to market. A mix of that knowledge combined with his love of road and gravel cycling puts him in the ideal position to put the latest kit through its paces.

He first made the switch to road cycling in 1999, primarily for fitness, but it didn’t take long for his competitive side to take over which led to around ten years as a time triallist and some pretty decent results. These days though riding is more about escapism, keeping the weight off and just enjoying the fact that he gets to ride the latest technology as part of his day job.

Add new comment

20 comments

Avatar
Ihatecheese | 3 years ago
1 like

It's amazing how venture capital backing resonates with the game of comarketing and branding of a university. If 4 people came out of Sheffield Hallum and spent 4 yrs designing wheels to sell then I feel they'd be reselling thru an online bike shop  discounted. But it's Princeton, 9th best globally rated!! Cool looking through, hopefully SRAM don't crush them thru litigation

Avatar
Chris Hayes replied to Ihatecheese | 3 years ago
0 likes

It says on their website that they are elite rowers turned cyclists.....that makes me like them more ..... Now look what you've gone and started, Hunt!

Avatar
CXR94Di2 | 3 years ago
0 likes

Deep aero wheels do increase speed.

1 to 1.5mph ave speed increase over long distance.

Ive got some new superwide rims 68mm deep coming from China to accept 30mm tubeless tyres. Once built with Hope or DT Swiss Hubs will be less than a £800

Avatar
OlieSimpson replied to CXR94Di2 | 3 years ago
0 likes

Care to share what rims you bought? I'm looking to do something similar.

Avatar
PRSboy | 3 years ago
0 likes

I know weather etc will make a difference, but I'd be interested if the reviewers of aero wheels could ride a certain loop a few times in different conditions and see what the difference is, in speed and power terms, in the real world vs a benchmark set of normal wheels. 

I know its far from perfect, but for most of us, this is more realistic than wind tunnel data which tends to be difficult to interpret, especially when manufacturers come out with nonsense like 15 watts faster at 40kmh.  

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to PRSboy | 3 years ago
1 like
PRSboy wrote:

I know weather etc will make a difference, but I'd be interested if the reviewers of aero wheels could ride a certain loop a few times in different conditions and see what the difference is, in speed and power terms, in the real world vs a benchmark set of normal wheels. 

I know its far from perfect, but for most of us, this is more realistic than wind tunnel data which tends to be difficult to interpret, especially when manufacturers come out with nonsense like 15 watts faster at 40kmh.  

I like that idea too.

Maybe have a particular wheelset that's used as comparison purposes and keep that the same over different reviews which would highlight differences in rider performance (e.g. really windy) and give a comparison to the reviewed wheels.

The main problem would be reviewers living in different areas would have to choose different loops, but we'd still see if there was much tangible difference with the new wheels. Then, we could have a leaderboard for the biggest percentage increase.

Of course that wouldn't take into account if a reviewer deliberately went easy with the comparison wheels and gave it all on the new ones, but we have to trust the reviewer otherwise why would we be reading their opinion?

Avatar
Miller replied to PRSboy | 3 years ago
1 like

I do have a pair of 60mm section carbon wheels, very cheap by comparison to the reviewed Princetons, nevertheless mine really fly by comparison to 'normal' wheels.  The speed does show up in Strava but the main thing is they feel great to ride, anyone would enjoy the experience. Mind you as my wheels are now a slightly retro rim-brake type, I restrict them to dry weather use. 

Avatar
PRSboy replied to Miller | 3 years ago
0 likes

I have one of those retro rim-brake bikes too!  What make are your wheels?  Do you find the 60mm tricky in winds?

Avatar
Miller replied to PRSboy | 3 years ago
1 like

I bought a pair of Farsports 60mm rims and built them up with cx-rays and Novatec hubs. I've had them a few years and they've been very solid. My 10 mile pb is on them, I like very much how they feel. If I'm down on TT aero bars I need to keep a firm grip if it's windy. On the road bike they're easy to handle although again, if windy, you need to be prepared if emerging from behind a hedge or whatever. It goes with the territory that an aero wheel is reactive to, well, air.

Avatar
PRSboy replied to Miller | 3 years ago
1 like

Fair point!

Hand built looks a great option for decent value... I found a builder with, umm, tribute Zipp 454 shaped wavy rims that looked very smart. 

Avatar
Miller replied to PRSboy | 3 years ago
1 like

The Princetons are in effect very fancy handbuilts as they're using non-proprietary spokes and hubs. If you have a builder and know the parts you want I'm sure you'll end up with satisfying custom wheels.

Avatar
Miller | 3 years ago
1 like

Let's call the Tune King/Kong hubs £500 and add another £100 for the Cx ray spokes. That puts the rims at £1,300 EACH. 

Who is buying wheels at £3k / pair any more? There are brilliant options for a half or a third the price.

Avatar
Yellow Saddle | 3 years ago
3 likes

What a load of nonsense. The author has zero scientific background and zero understanding of momentum, averages or structures, nor common sense.  It is time you employ scientific thinkers, not riders. Riding a million miles and reading marketing BS does not give you an u derstanding of basic physics. Stupid review. 

Avatar
WDG replied to Yellow Saddle | 3 years ago
12 likes
Yellow Saddle wrote:

What a load of nonsense. The author has zero scientific background and zero understanding of momentum, averages or structures, nor common sense.  It is time you employ scientific thinkers, not riders. Riding a million miles and reading marketing BS does not give you an u derstanding of basic physics. Stupid review. 

Don't fancy your chances if that's your pitch for an interview.  

Avatar
tomascjenkins replied to Yellow Saddle | 3 years ago
7 likes

A bad day
What are you objecting to in the review.
Do you know the reviewer? For all you know they might have some background in a scientific discipline.
Making lots of assumptions and kind of nasty

Avatar
Tinbob49 replied to Yellow Saddle | 3 years ago
8 likes
Yellow Saddle wrote:

...It is time you employ scientific thinkers, not riders...

Good one! A cycling website should absolutely employ scientists and not people who ride a bike. Hiring cyclists to write about cycling products is just silly isn't it. *rolls eyes*

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to Yellow Saddle | 3 years ago
4 likes

Is it pile-on time?

You'd be better off with making your criticism more specific as in which parts of the review are incorrect rather than just attacking the reviewer.

Personally, I don't put a lot of faith in wheel reviews as the basic hub/spoke/rim structure only allows for so much variation, so outside of a wind tunnel or a velodrome, it's going to be tricky to do anything other than a "feels like a wheel" kind of review. I'm also not a great believer that wheels can be 'harsh' - I like my wheels to be as stiff as possible for the weight and it's the tyres that do all the shock absorption (based on my non-scientific knowledge of wheels).

I do like the look of wavy rims though, but I'll wait for the designs to trickle down to cheaper manufacturers if they work well.

Avatar
Captain Badger replied to hawkinspeter | 3 years ago
1 like
hawkinspeter wrote:

Is it pile-on time?

You'd be better off with making your criticism more specific as in which parts of the review are incorrect rather than just attacking the reviewer.

Personally, I don't put a lot of faith in wheel reviews as the basic hub/spoke/rim structure only allows for so much variation, so outside of a wind tunnel or a velodrome, it's going to be tricky to do anything other than a "feels like a wheel" kind of review. I'm also not a great believer that wheels can be 'harsh' - I like my wheels to be as stiff as possible for the weight and it's the tyres that do all the shock absorption (based on my non-scientific knowledge of wheels).

I do like the look of wavy rims though, but I'll wait for the designs to trickle down to cheaper manufacturers if they work well.

Oooh, pile-on? Where? I can help!

Avatar
Yorky-M replied to Yellow Saddle | 3 years ago
1 like

Who reckons troll works for a rival bike wheel brand with his single post full of bitterness. Get out on your bike Yellow saddle and put some joy back in your black like. Who made you read it? who will make you buy them? move on

Avatar
erolorhun replied to Yellow Saddle | 3 years ago
0 likes

I agree...

Latest Comments