At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
I don't have a power meter but I have tried to gauge the effect of different positions on my bike for the same effort. I seem to get a fairly...
See recently reported comments by elected labour party represenetives in Burnley to see how that works.
We obviously have different ideas of what aggresive driving is. In my book, aggressive driving is using the car as a weapon, leaning on the horn...
The UCI and FFC could try supporting the organisor by helping to train up marshals, sharing best practice, helping to liase with local civil and...
Expect much more of this - at least for a while! (At least the last government didn't get the "plan for drivers" entirely through - although I'm...
Parcours Chrono - so good you included them twice?...
I often come into Bristol along the dual carriageway there as it's quicker than trying to find my way on the bike paths, but then I'm used to...
Mini driver. Figures.
I re-fuse to believe that not charging drivers is the current attitude
Most modern cars, especially SUV's perform very badly on the Moose test. Essentially a stunt driver has to weave through tightly spaced cones at...