At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
Agnostics & Atheists?
This! Probably from the same statisticians who trashed Wahoo a few days ago, based on a sample size of 2.
Thanks, I'll give that a try but don't think that will be the problem as I've not actually been able to get the app to open.
I would too, but my daughter lives there.
Yep, it was her. Twice.
I had two 'open' holes on the frame of an old Dawes I bought second-hand, one halfway down each fork. I tried to find bolts that fitted but couldn...
I keep expecting you to bring this one up when I see smallest bike lane articles https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/politics/yorkshire-council...
I used to live near the Greenwich tunnel and never had a problem walking. It's only about 4 minutes at a typical walking speed (3mph). As much...
Careful what you wish for - he could be doing the Oddyssey next. Or Finnegan's Wake.
The idea of more aerodynamic ears seemed at first to be appealing but then I realised they would be less effective air brakes on our steepest...