At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
John Crace said that Musk should rename Tesla with Swasti...
Lead bollards would have a density advantage over steel - while that might help resist a car's inertia it's just too malleable....
Shades of grey? So poorly written I didn't get past page 2.
I've had Garmin since the early eTrex days, and it's allways been hit and miss, and the latest cycling stuff is no exception. I use their marine...
Another one bites the dust at the hands of the uber-wealthy corporates. The price of everything, the value of nothing.
Thanks jaymack, I'll have a look at their website.
Better tyres, but weirdly enough almost no snow on this mountain.
BMW, Audi, GTI etc. drivers are immune to sob stories about dead cyclists and children.
You need to take wind chill/effect into account... at TT's speeds pouring water is certainly highly effective!
"89. Eighty nine years old and still allowed behind the wheel of a multi tonne weapon. Absolutely mad."...