The Lotus SH-309L CVR Commuter panniers are a budget choice, but budget doesn't necessarily mean good value. Here, the retention system lacks versatility and isn't the easiest to use, they're water 'resistant' rather than waterproof and the seams aren't sealed, and generally I'm left thinking that new cycle commuters would be better off looking elsewhere.
For commuting, I want a pannier that I can get on and off my bike without really having to think, ideally with a retention system that positions the bag in the same place without fail. To get these Lotus panniers on and off either took two hands or a fair amount of fiddling about, or both – not ideal for something you're potentially doing twice a day.
> Find your nearest dealer here
> Buy these online here
The upper part of the retention system consists of two chunky friction clips and a spring latch, none of which can be adjusted lengthways to suit your rack's stay positions. The clips also only suit 10mm tubing, so bad news if you have chunkier tubes. I found that even when the panniers were full, the friction clips still required a hefty push to get them to locate properly.
Removing the pannier required both hands, one to pull the handle up and one to operate the latch, although those with longer and stronger fingers might manage it one-handed. Lotus agrees that it needs to improve the quick-release aspect – its concern has been more with the panniers staying on securely, but in achieving that, removing them is harder than it should be.
The lower retention consists of a hook attached to a Y of elastic, anchored at the upper clips. The hook goes through a webbing loop at the bottom, and then attaches to the bottom of your rack. It didn't naturally engage the upright stays of my rack, and was a fiddle to get it on; your rack might make it easier/harder/impossible.
The body of the bag is made from woven polyester, with the lid and front pocket made of ripstop nylon; they feel a bit cheap and flimsy to me, and I did have my doubts that they would last particularly well for long-term commuting use, though Lotus assures me the fabric is both strong and reliable and that no panniers have been returned under warranty. The materials are water resistant rather than waterproof, and the seams aren't sealed, so the most you can hope for is that they'll protect against a light shower or drizzle. That's not especially unusual in budget panniers, but there are waterproof options out there – one such, which is only slightly more expensive (sold singly for £29.99), is Lomo's Dry Pannier; the rack attachment system is straightforward too.
The Lotus bags also have no padding or internal pockets, so if you're carrying a laptop it will need its own protection. Again, though, not unusual at this price.
> Read more road.cc reviews of panniers here
Externally, there's a large secondary pocket on the 'front', and two mesh pockets on the sides. I'm not a big fan of the mesh pockets – there's nothing I can think of that I'd want to carry in them over a fully enclosed pocket – but I suppose you can stuff something in there quickly, and it probably saves weight over a full pocket. There's a single strap handle, but no shoulder strap to carry the bags into the office (something Lotus says it will 'explore' for future production).
As you can probably guess, I'm not a big fan of these. There is a place in the market for cheap, simple panniers for those just discovering the joy of cycling to work, but the basics need to be right, and I don't think these do anything particularly well. I had hoped they would be something I could point friends towards when asked what to get, but I'm afraid I would only advise they look elsewhere – for now at least.
Verdict
Basic bags need to get the basics right, and these don't really hit the mark
Make and model: Lotus SH-309L CVR Commuter Double Rear Pannier Bags
Size tested: 34.8 Litres, L 32cm x W 20cm x H 38cm
Tell us what the product is for, and who it's aimed at. What do the manufacturers say about it? How does that compare to your own feelings about it?
Going by the name alone, these are aimed at commuters, so should be suitable for heavy repeated use in all conditions – that's certainly what I'd expect.
Lotus says: "Pair of large pannier bags. Drawstring closure with elasticized lid and buckle fastening. Large front pocket and 2 mesh side pockets, it allows users to store many stuffs."
I'm not convinced that they do a very good job.
Tell us some more about the technical aspects of the product?
Constructed from heavy duty polyester for the main body with rip stop nylon for the top cover and outside pocket. Attachment points are non-adjustable.
From the distributor's website:
600D Polyester & 420D Nylon (rip-stop)
34.8 litre capacity
Weight: 1145g
Size: L 32cm x W 20cm x H 38cm
3M Scotchlite reflective strips
Drawstring closure
Elasticated lid and buckle fastening
Large front pocket and 2 mesh pockets
Compatible fitting with most pannier racks
Fitted using hooks and straps
Separate bags
Water repellent fabric used
Rate the product for quality of construction:
6/10
Rate the product for performance:
4/10
Rate the product for durability:
5/10
Materials feel cheap and flimsy, though I might be proved wrong. The construction of the retainer especially is a worry.
Rate the product for weight (if applicable)
7/10
Rate the product for value:
4/10
A good example of cheap not being good value.
Tell us how the product performed overall when used for its designed purpose
Not well. I found them hard to get on and off the bike, and the seams aren't waterproof.
Tell us what you particularly liked about the product
The price.
Tell us what you particularly disliked about the product
Feel, fitting to the bike, mesh pockets, water resistance...
Did you enjoy using the product? No
Would you consider buying the product? No
Would you recommend the product to a friend? No
Use this box to explain your score
With their fiddly retention clips and a lack of versatility in terms of fitting to other tube diameters and adjustment, these panniers can only achieve a low score. I'm torn between 3 for 'poor' and 4 for 'below average'; if they fit your rack they're probably a 4, but if not, they're a 3 – though you're unlikely to buy them if they don't fit.
Age: 32 Height: 180cm Weight: 90kg
I usually ride: Kona Dew Drop My best bike is: Ribble Sportive Bianco
I've been riding for: 10-20 years I ride: Every day I would class myself as: Experienced
I regularly do the following types of riding: commuting, club rides, sportives, general town riding, exploring
Could it be that an industry * with vast wealth and long cultivated influence, which is now seen as providing something both practically and...
Presumably a) expense b) for something that (mostly) works against your customers' convenience? And the usual "but emergencies - what about when...
Is there any real world evidence that slightly reducing the weight of your crank arms actually makes your bike faster? Seems like a hell of lot of...
Remembrance event driving incident sees woman reported (paywall)...
Still no.
I was going to suggest the Fairlight Strael too, and went to check if it came in on budget. While there, I finally ordered the frameset I've been...
"No darling, I said a cactus bike holder, not a bike cactus holder."...
I have visited Guernsey and my wife goes there a few times a year for work. This act of premeditated violence shocks me. There are quite a lot of...
You could well be right. Personally, I think Avonvale Rd is just a disaster for having two way traffic. So many drivers think the traffic calming...
Although Muller Rd isn't great to cycle on (the north end, anyhow), it's certainly not the worst. I'm definitely in the "brave and bold cyclist" at...