At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
Xena could hardly string a sentence together (no doubt caused by the drug use they admitted to), so can't be Roulero (sp)....
Chapeau! Or - down with this reckless, dangerous "speeding" behaviour....
Would have been nice to have details here. Not blaming Road.cc who certainly had to pad out the article, but none of the Swindon paper reports have...
Usually I would agree that it's not worthwhile, but for particular pages like this that will appear in Google searches and suchlike, where a casual...
1.8 kg? I've got a 1980s Columbus SLX steel frame that weighs less than that. It also weighs more than my Genesis 953 stainless (1.65 kg). Porky!
If I only ride on cycle paths, shared pedestrian...
Chapeau
I quite like it as it is. You can actually play to miss a race sometimes because they're so unpredictable between sprinters and the rest....
I bet the World Bollard Association could help... https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=i_Cw0QJU8ro
Because aero trumps light weight most times? Maybe