At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
Seems as though this problem has been going back a few years, so as someone suggested upthread maybe some kind of sting operation could be...
I had to read the whole of that article. Thoroughly gripping
Tried again this morning to upgrade to premium as I only have one credit left, any update on a fix please admin/moderators? Thanks in advance for...
Hehe, nice one, this artticle
BC have such a poor reputation that I believed this... until I got to the Range Rover bit
Which one did you have in mind?
As far a sales are concerned these copies from Topeak and other, cheaper ones on eBay etc. are a non issue, really....
A good start would be for Garmin to stop shipping their devices with such a fugly bar mount. My 530 came with a big, chunky plastic lump of an...
'Selfish cow' written on mum's car window in Westcountry town...
When I see stories like this I rejoice that E bikes are limited to 15.5 mph and the marvellous protection afforded to me by helmets and hi viz. ...