At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
This is exactly the sort of thing AI enables them to do. Previously it was thought impossible to do something like "if user is travelling for 3...
It's not just cyclists... here's a BBC article with a wildlife trust reminding people to keep their dogs under control where asked to in the...
No, just to expensive, I went Jonas and Demi as the expensive picks....
[Snip]...
Well, Edinburgh certainly has hills, there's quite a bit of pavé and Arthur's seat is regularly motor-traffic-free anyway, so that would work. ...
It was never the same after David Duffield left. With no more "Turn your granny to the wall" it felt too professional. And in the era of big...
I think there could be a whole other thread there... per your post on the funnies of the US vs. Switzerland. (Or possibly a report to government...
Now where's the fun in being logical?...
I don't know how I can make it any more clear, so I will just repeat myself: "'I was not saying counterbalance isn't a thing"....
Ah, but they're used by crims! Feckless yoof probably dealing / stealing when they're not wheelying down the roads or pavements (is it them that...