Rishi Sunak’s so-called ‘Plan for Motorists’ – a package of measures expected to be announced at the upcoming Conservative Party conference which will curb the introduction of 20mph speed limits and allow drivers to use bus lanes more frequently – has been criticised by the UK’s leading cycling and walking organisations, who say the proposals will restrict people’s travel choices, “leaving many with one default option: to drive”.
The prime minister’s expected announcement, first reported by the Guardian, marks his latest contentious attempt to win votes by taking an explicit pro-motoring stance, a position first outlined over the summer when Sunak claimed he was “on the side” of drivers and underscored by last week’s highly divisive pledge to water down some of the government’s key net zero commitments, such as the ban on the sale of new petrol and diesel cars by 2030.
Sunak’s latest ‘Plan for Motorists’, which is expected to be announced at the Conservative conference on Monday, is reported to include proposals to limit the power of local authorities in England to place new 20mph speed limits on main roads.
Earlier this month, 20mph speed limits were implemented on almost 500km of roads in Wales, with initial analysis suggesting a “dramatic” change in traffic speeds, and a “far more pleasant” and safer environment for cyclists and walkers, while journey times for motorists in Cardiff and Wrexham have increased by 45 and 63 seconds, respectively.
Aside from limiting the power of councils to introduce 20mph limits, the prime minister aims to restrict the number of hours a day that car traffic is banned from bus lanes, while also curbing the ability of local authorities to impose fines from traffic infractions caught by automatic number plate recognition cameras, and on the use of such cameras at box junctions.
Sunak is also expected to raise concerns about 15-minute cities, an urban planning concept devised to enable residents to easily walk or cycle to necessities such as shops, schools, or pharmacies, but which has come under fire in recent months from conspiracy theorists who believe the schemes are part of a plot to restrict movement and infringe upon individual freedoms.
> Tory MP attacks 15-minute city concept with known conspiracy theory
A Department for Transport source, however, has described the policies as “speculation”.
Nevertheless, six of the UK’s leading active travel groups have claimed that the prime minister’s reported ‘Plan for Motorists’ will deny citizens “their choice, health, and freedom”.
According to the CEOs of Cycling UK, British Cycling, Bikeability Trust, Living Streets, Ramblers, and Sustrans, the proposals, instead of giving people real choice over how they live their lives, “ignore possibilities for cheap, reliable, and sustainable travel, leaving many with one default option: to drive”.
The Plan for Motorists, the organisations claim, “strips away opportunities” for families, currently in the midst of a cost of living crisis, to allow their children to walk or cycle to school safely, live healthy lives, and to travel to work or make short journeys cheaply, while also increasing congestion and pollution.
> Rishi Sunak accused of seeking to exploit division over LTNs as he orders review of schemes
“When the government should be giving people more opportunities to live their lives responsibly, it’s robbing them of options,” a joint statement from the six groups says.
“When Ministers could be promoting public transport, cycling, and walking as cheap sustainable options in a cost of living and climate crisis, they’re entrenching congestion and reliance on driving for short, local journeys.
“When the government could respect people’s freedom to choose how they travel, it’s removing the alternatives. This is a plan that looks no further than one way of travelling and will make the roads worse for those occasions when people do need to drive.
“Having a reliable bus route to work, the freedom to cycle to the park, or to be able to let your children walk to school safely while breathing clean air should not be beyond us.
“This plan restricts people’s travel choices, setting the country on cruise control towards missed net zero targets and a worsening health and inactivity crisis, while denying our children of their independence and freedom to move around their local area safely.”
Last week, Cycling UK argued that Sunak’s “watering down” of the UK’s net zero commitments underlines the need for the public to show their support for green, healthy policies.
The prospect of active travel, as well as environmental, initiatives being dragged onto the campaign trail ahead of the next general election became increasingly likely over the summer, in the wake of the Conservatives’ win at the Uxbridge and South Ruislip by-election, a narrow victory credited to the Tory opposition to Labour mayor Sadiq Khan’s plans to extend London’s Ultra-Low Emission Zone.
Following that symbolic by-election, Sunak announced that was “on the side” of motorists and ordered the Department for Transport (DfT) to undertake a review of LTNs and traffic-calming measures, prompting Cycling UK to urge the prime minister to avoid sowing dissension between cyclists, pedestrians, and motorists by using the schemes as a “political football” during the election campaign.




















96 thoughts on “Rishi Sunak’s ‘Plan for Motorists’ will “rob people of choice” and force them to drive, say cycling and walking campaigners”
Rishi wrote:
Oh, FFS!
But then, he does count a helicopter as essential personal transport…
brooksby wrote:
He’s just full of lies. The ULEZ is unlikely to affect ordinary families unless they’ve got one of the older more polluting vehicles.
What about our rights to breathe in air without getting respiratory diseases from all the tyre particulates and car pollution? What about children being able to play in the street without some red-faced Daily Heil reader shouting abuse at them from behind his wheel?
Enough is enough – can everyone just not vote Tory ever again please?
But, He’s going to fix the
But, He’s going to fix the potholes
Cycloid wrote:
Probably just in rich, tory-voting areas. And he’ll boast about it.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-62436193
Anyhow, let’s not forget about all the extra people he killed with his astoundingly stupid “Eat Out to Help Out” campaign to spread Covid quicker.
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2023/jun/03/sunak-under-fire-as-stupid-eat-out-to-help-out-scheme-to-be-focus-of-covid-inquiry
The conversations below leads
The conversations below leads to two conclusions
1) Rishi Sunak will turn anything into a political football, if he thinks it will get him votes.
2) With any luck he may be alienating more right thinking people than winning new votes
Cycloid wrote:
Experience with Brexit gives me little hope in this outcome
No he won’t! Rishi ‘7 bins
No he won’t! Rishi ‘7 bins meat tax’ Sunak is doing literally anything to make tories relevant. Desperately embarrassing decision making!
Well, having seen these
Well, having seen these policies I shall never vote Tory again.
(Though as I’ve never yet voted Tory this is will probably not have the effect I would wish).
Rod Marton wrote:
That’s the spirit!
I too, pledge to never vote Tory.
I’ll see you and raise you.
I’ll see you and raise you. I did, a long time ago, but will not do so now. Churchill said something like “if you’re not a liberal at 20 you have no heart; if you’re not a conservative at 40 you have no head”. I was a conservative at 20 and liberal at 40 so I guess I have neither.
Interestingly, Churchill
Interestingly, Churchill never said this but he’d have looked pretty stupid if he had, seeing as he himself was a Tory MP at the age of 25 and a Liberal one when he turned 35.
I too, pledge to never vote
I too, pledge to never vote Tory
I don’t like to predict the future, but as I have never voted Tory in a parliamentary election and am now 71, I’m pretty close to you.
Well, never say never… if
Well, never say never… if cycling everywhere became a prestige thing and they changed their policies to favour that, plus more sustainable development, farming etc – perhaps something along those lines might even be popular in the Shires…
OTOH most of us are urban. It’s less about the toffs and more about winning the numbers game of the majority of the voting population. That’s somewhere in the middle in the UKs wealth, albeit between slightly to massively wealthy in global terms.
(Hence major parties with little but the colour of their rosette and the name of their leader to separate them. Most went to the same unis and worked at the same firms – those that had a job first of course.)
Probably the private car is one of the few near-universal markers of prestige (even more important if you know you’re towards the bottom of the heap).
I still think almost any party could spin active travel improvements and the raft of benefits you could tap into thereby as compatible with their ideology. But that looks like distributed money *savings*, not quick cash concentration. Big bung theory again.
Probably too late for the Conservatives to make a supporter of me though. Emotional reasoning on my part and it seems they’d have to change too much. Mind you, few of the other political groups are exactly inspiring me on the “improving the world” front. Probably “it’s not you, it’s me”…
Rishi wrote:
Not only pro-motorist, but pro-law-breaking-motorist….
” London imposing the Ulez
” London imposing the Ulez charge, £12.50 on ordinary families when they’re just trying to get their kids to school, take them to football practice, go weekly shopping or, you know, get to work.”
That’s motornomativity – in a large city with frankly excellent public transport system, the idea that cars are a sensible choice for everyday short journeys. No one (excluding people in wheelchairs etc) needs to be driven to school in London.
the little onion wrote:
My family is a fairly ordinary London family (albeit better off than average). My kids walk to cycle; we walk to my son’s football practice; I ride to work; our weekly shop is delivered. But yes, we do drive – my wife drives to work, for example – by our 13 year old car is ULEZ compliant.
From the media coverage, you
From the media coverage, you’d think that ULEZ is some terrible measure affecting absolutely every driver travelling in the zone. I think more than 9 out of 10 vehicles are compliant. Mine is, although I’ve not driven it for two weeks, and that is 11 years old.
Indeed – just like the 15
Indeed – just like the 15 minute city Hunger Games & LTN nonsense. Manufactured culture war BS because that’s the last straw they are clinging to
The Press are creating all of
The Press are creating all of this for clicks. Nobody, as far as I can see, is creating policies to force someone out of their car.
The introduction of 20mph zones or limits is primarily due to idiots that can’t be trusted to drive at an appropriate speed for their surroundings, never mind within a 30mph limit!
For many years, almost every new housing development is in reality a LTN as through routes are avoided if possible. Nobody is STOPPED from driving anywhere generally and the latest 15mins neighbourhood is trying to make sure everything you need is within a 15 minute walk, NOT stopping you driving for more than 15mins. Unless you believe the Press of course…..
I see that the Tory party are
I see that the Tory party are implementing a ‘scorched earth policy’ as they prepare for opposition – only this time it’s the actual Earth they are looking to destroy.
Still, won’t affect Sunak – must be fun to watch the world flood or burn from the top of an Ivory Tower.
I see that the Tory party are
I see that the Tory party are implementing a ‘scorched earth policy’ as they prepare for opposition – only this time it’s the actual Earth they are looking to destroy.
Still, won’t affect Sunak – must be fun to watch the world flood or burn from the top of an Ivory Tower.
Excellent work from Rishi and
Excellent work from Rishi and the Conservatives – standing up for the people against the wokerati and vociferous minority who are only interested in their own lives and money, and not the wider economies and everyone else.
Very overdue – it’s ridiculous that a ULEZ tax can even just be implemented like that with no say from the people. 20mph speed limits have already been proven to be pointless.
Everyone still has free choice on what transport to use – but for once, the favour goes back to those who need to drive cars for once, while not dropping the cycling need.
Friday again!
Friday again!
Barman…..! A wokerati on the rocks!
I’ll have mine with a side
I’ll have mine with a side order of Tofu and and a copy of the Guardian to read.
Friday again!
Friday again!
Barman…..! A wokerati on the rocks!
Make mine a double too!
Make mine a double too!
Ha ha.
Ha ha.
It’s the gremlins stil running amok on road.cc’s servers I think.
As the season changes and
As the season changes and some favour more indoor activities I can recommend “Vociferous Minority”, a reboot of the classic Minority Reboot, featuring an out-of-shape Lance Strongarm as Tom Cruise. The plot features a dystopia future where a bureau has been set up to predict crimes before they occur. This has led to a massive fall in crime (as none is reported). However Lance discovers that there is actually a “minority report” (appearing on road.cc and in the Guardian) produced by a tiny minority of “vociferous vulnerable road users” (30 million). This has been covered up in a not-secret-at-all conspiracy. Can he win the war on the motorist and save the school run? Strong support from Nigel Garrage as the saintly Mr. Toad and a comedy turn by Chris Boardman playing against type as a lycra-clad Stravawarrior.
Original soundtrack by DJ
Original soundtrack by DJ Chadders? (mainly just an annoyingly repetitive & grating background noise)
I thought Vociferous Minority
I thought Vociferous Minority was the band that Ginger Baker played in after Cream split up.
Having watched the aged Baker
Having watched the aged Baker smash a documentary maker in the nose with his stick (still had his timing…) I suspect that you’re right, but it would be the vociferous minority in favour of running over cyclists.
Having said that apparently he was a bit of a cycling fiend before he became a musician (and … general fiend) so perhaps the other way round?
chrisonatrike wrote:
Roadcc servers being used by AI to predict 1000s of possible futures and determine which one is most likely would certainly explain the performance of the website.
Ha ha.
Ha ha.
It’s the gremlins still running amok on road.cc’s servers I think.
As the season changes and
As the season changes and some favour more indoor activities I can recommend “Vociferous Minority”, a reboot of the classic Minority Reboot, featuring an out-of-shape Lance Strongarm as Tom Cruise. The plot features a dystopia future where a bureau has been set up to predict crimes before they occur. This has led to a massive fall in crime (as none is reported). However Lance discovers that there is actually a “minority report” (appearing on road.cc and in the Guardian) produced by a tiny minority of “vociferous vulnerable road users” (30 million). This has been covered up in a not-secret-at-all conspiracy. Can he win the war on the motorist and save the school run? Strong support from Nigel Garrage as the saintly Mr. Toad and a comedy turn by Chris Boardman playing against type as a lycra-clad Stravawarrior.
By the way, I’m still proud
By the way, I’m still proud to be a Woke, Snowflake, Lefty Loser.
Me too.
Me too.
MattieKempy wrote:
Yes, and if I remember correctly I said something last time along the lines of “get lost”
Is it comedy hour already?
Is it comedy hour already?
Ooooo! LifL-piffle – my
Ooooo! LifL-piffle – my favourite kind of mindless Toryspiv stoopids all strung together by a cardboard cutout pin-striped dafty sprung fully-formed albeit only in two dimensions from the Torygraft cartoon page. (That being any page of this particular old comic-for-the-nasty).
How much is that Starmer paying you to make Toryspivery look as daft as a brush? (A bogbrush, to boot)!
Anyway, keep ’em coming. Laffs is good for us all.
I’ll tell you what robbed me
I’ll tell you what robbed me and my family of choice – the 40mph traffic on our local roads which scares my chidren from cycling. The complete lack of alternative safe cycle routes. The fact that they need to cross four lanes of traffic to get to the park. The cars whizzing up and down the street which means they can’t safely play in the street or go to their friends’ houses unnaccompanied. The cars parked on pavements which makes using a pushchair impossible.
Not 20mph zones or modal filters.
I wait to see the data on
I wait to see the data on changes to air quality in outer London, but my expectation is the ULEZ expansion will have minimal impact. 2 reasons for this: a) only about 10% of journies were by non compliant vehicles. b) most of the non compliant vehicles already have reasonably low emissions anyway. Gone are the days of the British Leyland oil burning engines!
It’s difficult to say exactly
It’s difficult to say exactly. In that 10% there will be some disproportionately polluting vehicles – ones that produce 30x NO2 and particulates compared to compliant vehicles. That has the potential to make a noticeable difference, but only if they actually disappear from the roads rather than pay (or avoid paying) the ULEZ charge.
It’s difficult to say exactly
Edit: duplicate
Can someone please sort out this website?!
We could have another round
We could have another round of “what I did while waiting for the page to load” I’ve done a complete rebuild of a Sturmey Archer 5s hub, broken-in a Brooks B17, got a frame resprayed at Argos and worn out my Gator Skins.
David9694 wrote:
I thought it was just me. I rebuilt my computer and switched ISP believing it was a damaged wireless device and poor internet. I should have simply checked another website.
Sunak is everything that’s
Sunak is everything that’s broken with British politics. He’s literally tearing strategic policies that broadly had cross party support to try to get a few votes. Whatever happened to their bold vision for cycling and walking.
I can’t get any of our local Tories to admit that a LWCIP is their idea and that they challenged councils to be bold. They wrote Gear Change, they updated the HC, they set up Active Travel England. WTF aren’t the media and the opposition parties all over this, surely their biggest U turn yet.
A motorist is just a person
A motorist is just a person in a car. There are so many people in cars, that it is scary for people to choose anything other than car travel. Perhaps if we slow down cars in certain areas and reduce them in some areas then people will feel safer not using a car.
This is not a war.
It’s not about making
It’s not about making rational transport choices either.
I find it worrying that
I find it worrying that “driving a car wherever and whenever I want” us being framed as some sort of Great British Patriotic duty, because that implies that everything else is unpatriotic or unBritish (and therefore a valid target).
Reminds me of all that Enemies of the People stuff a few years ago when some high court judges had the temerity to point out that what the Govt was doing (whatever it was) was actually illegal…
I find it worrying that
I find it worrying that “driving a car wherever and whenever I want” us being framed as some sort of Great British Patriotic duty, because that implies that everything else is unpatriotic or unBritish (and therefore a valid target).
Reminds me of all that Enemies of the People stuff a few years ago when some high court judges had the temerity to point out that what the Govt was doing (whatever it was) was actually illegal…
brooksby wrote:
Take your pick, there are so many to choose from.
Forget about Sunak. The
Forget about Sunak. The question should be what are the STP, Starmer Tory Party, going to do?
Probably “not much for the
Probably “not much for the cyclist”. Seriously – before this point about the high point was Corbyn getting on a bike. (Which – for parity – even Boris did on occasion).
However what they’ll say is probably some similar stuff to Sunak, with the appendix “because x years of the Tories have ruined it for you”.
Whether that “sets the tone” or whether they nail themselves to something like this remains to be seen.
I think this doesn’t change the nature of people in the UK (or anywhere) though. That is – we’re very much wedded to driving. However a surprising number will at least say (in person) that they might like quieter streets, to be able to get things locally, to be able to get their kids to school without the car, etc.
However it’s very easy to generate noise and opposition. I think this sadly goes a bit further than just the “usual suspects”. BUT when change does happen and it makes somewhere feel less like a road with houses attached and more like a place, after a few months getting used to it few people want to go back.
Well Labour’s first response
Well Labour’s first response was to attack the Tories for introducing LTNs in the first place, so you can work out how the rest of this will go.
stonojnr wrote:
There We Are Then.
I think Rishi has overlooked
I think Rishi has overlooked an issue that I expect would win him some more votes – Vigilante cyclists praying on ‘innocent’ motorists waiting in traffic! Rishi should announce a review of “Operation Snap” and stop the likes of @CyclingMikey victimising drivers when they are no danger to anyone!
?advocate. Don’t be surprised if this turns out to be true?
Trevor Anderson wrote:
Yup, I’ve prayed for a few motorists, but not for good things for them.
I suggest perhaps that you
I suggest perhaps that you look up the meaning of the word vigilante and also while you are at it look up the meaning of the word innocent as you are very wrong on both counts!
I suggest perhaps that you
I suggest perhaps that you look up the meaning of the word vigilante and also while you are at it look up the meaning of the word innocent as you are very wrong on both counts!
I think you have missed TA’s irony. I’ve had a quick look back, and I think he’s a good guy, rather than one of the usual dimwit trolling retreads
I think you misunderstood my
I think you misunderstood my posting!
Yes, i do fully apologize
Yes, i do fully apologize having reread it, I’ll get me coat!
I suggest perhaps that you
I suggest perhaps that you look up the meaning of the word vigilante and also while you are at it look up the meaning of the word innocent as you are very wrong on both counts!
Trevor Anderson wrote:
I shouldn’t be in the least surprised, have seen quite a few drivists seriously proposing that regulations should be changed so that only evidence from official cameras can be used to prosecute motoring offences. Apparently some cyclists deliberately set their cameras up to make it appear as if an offence has been committed when none has. I did ask (this was on Xcrement) how I could set my camera up to do this but didn’t get an answer.
Rendel Harris wrote:
Turn it on?
The tories have identified a
The tories have identified a wedge issue to divide, and they hope, to continue ruling. They are taking their unexpected win in Uxbridge due to the mass disinformation campaign, as a reason to pretend to be in favour of drivers: they aren’t really, they’re just using them to try to get elected again.
The only problem being that if it worked in Uxbridge, it could work again. I think I’ll dash off another email to my MP, Mark Harper, for him to start ignoring immediately.
If think you’re being very
If think you’re being very cynical. I’m sure Rishi Sunak has a lot of genuine empathy for hardworking drivers. After all, he takes the car himself whenever his helicopter is grounded with technical issues.
The biggest single purpose of
The biggest single purpose of car trips is leisure.
HarrogateSpa wrote:
Yes… but the issue with cars is that they’re “good enough” for a multitude of tasks and once you have them it seems to be much cheaper per trip once you’ve paid for the fixed costs.
So we’ve
twothree problems:1) Once you have a car, that’s the default. And if you start the day by driving, obviously you’re more likely to keep using your car for other journeys, at least until you return home.
2) Other modes have to offer a clear advantage over the car and that’s not easy after over a century of prioritising and subsidising driving.
3) If you try to rebalance the transport system at some point you will have to restrict driving in some way or make it more expensive / less convenient. At which point you run up against a powerful psychological drive (loss aversion). So you’re stopping us doing things / attacking our freedoms / hitting the poorest hardest etc.
Oh, and because they’re ubiquitous we judge what is “possible” (and then – once we’ve done it a few times – what is necessary) around the capabilities of the car.
chrisonatrike wrote:
NOBODY expects the Spanish Inquisition! Our chief weapon is surprise…surprise and fear…fear and surprise…. Our two weapons are fear and surprise…and ruthless efficiency…. Our *three* weapons are fear, surprise, and ruthless efficiency…and an almost fanatical devotion to the Pope…. Our *four*…no… *Amongst* our weapons…. Amongst our weaponry…are such elements as fear, surprise…. I’ll come in again.
ubercurmudgeon wrote:
I read an article which, in his defence, talked about how he always uses an SUV to get safely from buildings across the field to his waiting helicopter…
The real reason they won in
The real reason they won in Uxbridge was the 8000 student votes many of which would have gone to labour which didn’t get cast as the election was held in the university holiday. This idea that ulez was the reason is rubbish
Seventyone wrote:
I also read about the Tory candidate being a local lad, whilst Labour brought in someone from London.
There’s nothing he can do to
There’s nothing he can do to make drivers truly happy to make them support him. Whatever he – any political leader – does it’s never going to be enough for drivers, it never can be.
https://youtu.be/7TKvmzYJHds
https://youtu.be/7TKvmzYJHds?si=6d1muiztaqTSLpP7
Screw the Dafties. Vote for Ogmios.
Where I live the Labour MP
Where I live the Labour MP will win in the next election anyway, mean tactically there’s no reason to vote for them, so I’m just planning on voting for whichever party supports active travel the most. Any advice on which I should vote for?
Jippily wrote:
Vote Green to send a message
Vote Green to send a message
Vote Green to send a message
I think I would do that, unless there was a real possibility that such action by numerous people could lead to The Dark Side not receiving the deserved trouncing. I once voted SDP when I thought that Labour was overdoing it with Michael Foot (great man, but not the man for leader)
I’d just scrutinise (and
I’d just scrutinise (and ideally speak to) the local candidates. They may not win this rodeo but they tend to be back again. A bit of love for someone who’s sticking their neck out politically can be important – politicians spend most of their lives fielding complaints and indeed abuse. And voicing support for active travel is still a brave thing in the UK. Never mind cycling or – Lord preserve us – questioning motor dominance!
Unless “independent” (check – sometimes this just means “Conservative, but left in a huff when they called me a fruitcake”) they’ll be limited by the main party organisation of course. However if sympathetic – or even interested – they can do things up to and including getting Member’s bills tabled.
It’s only the Greens at Westminster as far a I can see. If you’re in a devolved region then maybe more choice? Welsh Labour have said they’ll cut road building and have actually changed 30mph defaults to 20mph which are moves in the right direction. Scotland – SNP got a reasonable share of the transport budget slated for active travel although what that will actually go to funding is still a question. And they dropped the ball on replacing 30mph defaults with 20mph.
Poop poop!
Poop poop!
A talking head driver was
A talking head driver was asked by the BBC news about 20mph. He basically said that if drivers stuck to the 30mph limit he didn’t think there was a problem with the current arrangement. Fair enough I thought let’s try that. Went out for a ride and clearly his plan wasn’t working so there is still a problem. I wonder if he has another suggestion?
Hundreds of people in Cambs
Hundreds of people in Cambs call for legal driving age to be reduced to 15
The sea is right over that way.
Thankfully, this genius idea isn’t catching on in the comments.
https://www.cambridge-news.co.uk/news/cambridge-news/hundreds-people-cambs-call-legal-27816782
With that kind of blue-sky
With that kind of blue-sky lateral thinking, the sea may be coming to them, sooner than they think…
Fixthebloodysite AKA
Are they also calling for the legal age of responsibility to be reduced as well? I can just imagine rich teens (who will be the only ones that the insurance companies will allow) racing around the place, crashing into people and then not being able to be treated as an adult by any courts and that’s assuming that the police would even bother trying to prosecute them.
Point of order – legal age of
Point of order – legal age of criminal responsibility in E&W is 10.
Excellent work Rishi – some
Excellent work Rishi – some long overdue introductions to bring the motorist more on a par with the bike.
The good thing is that all the good stuff done around active travel will continue while also supporting those who need their vehicles.
Left_is_for_Losers wrote:
Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha.
Oh, sorry, you were serious. Let me laugh even harder.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!
Jetmans Dad wrote:
Dishi Rishi is rather fishi, with nashty mashy of cyclist wishi. Upon our bikes he likes to pishi!
I too enjoy LifL-piffle, although its utterly simplistic …. but so is Sooty & Sweep and that Andy Pandy. I enjoyed them too – when I was four years old, 286 years ago.
Loony LifL is coming to play, tra la lah la lah-lah.
But perhaps he is a woodentop, incarnate?
But what are they doing for
But what are they doing for fisherfolk?
Quote:
As is the case now with bus lanes on all but the very busiest roads in London. Excellent work Rishi, introducing something that actually already exists; this can go alongside your banning of the non-existent meat tax and compulsory car sharing as a really productive way to move the country forward.
Rich’ol Sunak can 0121 as we
Rich’ol Sunak can 0121 as we say in the midlands, the tories in their current disgusting guise are finished and appear to be setting alight to the house on their way out.
It’s depressing to think that I’m only ‘marginally less disgusted’ with the thought of the existing labour lot getting their hands on the controls.. but that thought is saved by the redeeming factor that surely no-one could do a worse job of running the country… could they…
I would like to say that anyone with a feasible active travel plan would get my vote, but it seems that even that completly common sense based area of politics, this week has become a hot potato.. so that’s another thing the Conserva-tits have messed up.. they are the absolute worst.
brexit guru frost thinks you
brexit guru frost thinks you can get to manchester from london in 30 mins by flying.
What hope is there for any sensible road policy for *all* road users ?
On 15 minute cities, please
On 15 minute cities, please don’t fall for “an urban planning concept devised to…” framing … it’s like LTNs having been planning policy since ~1960 and planning practice since at least 1930, but in the 15-M-C case that’s just a new name for how cities have been since Ancient Rome or earlier.
I hear from the Tory Party
I hear from the Tory Party conference that York is to be abolished
Britain’s most walkable city is a ‘tremendous place’ – full list of staycation hotspots
https://www.express.co.uk/travel/articles/1747674/york-holiday-staycation-walkable-city
Nah, they’re just considering
Nah, they’re just considering removing the onerous requirement that historic walled cities dependent on tourism should have historic walls. Or monuments.
For too long the previous government (chancellor – R. Sunak) tried to force this requirment on hard-working drivers (of cars, steam trains or indeed carts). Radical Rishi the captain of change says – let’s remove these restrictions to the free flow of traffic! Vote Conservative to get rid of the Barbican and break free of the Bars!
The Conservatives – looking out for your
heritageleafy cul-de-sacsrat run!David9694 wrote:
When did the definition of “staycation” change from “spending vacation time at home, not going anywhere” to “not leaving the UK”?
Around 2008 I believe.
Around 2008 I believe.