The 10-mile time trial, a staple of the British racing scene, is now with a new record for the road bike discipline after George Fox set a blistering time of 18:41 on Sunday.
Just last month Cycling Time Trials introduced a road bike category to all of its events in a bid to “get more people time trialling”, just don’t expect to get too close to George’s 51.6km/h average speed if you do fancy giving it a go.
On his mind since 2019, George admitted previously setting a time of 19:19 “almost by accident” but that it “sparked the interest in just seeing what was physically possible”.
“This winter came a real concerted effort into testing equipment and spending a lot more time in the position,” he told road.cc. “I’ve road raced the bike for most of this year, various crits and a local handicap series which proved really useful to force myself to hold an aero position as training for Sunday essentially.
“Everything fell into place really nicely on the day, it was no accident that I was ready for the occasion though as the date had been written on the wall in the office ever since the CTT calendar got posted in the new year!
“We’re in a science based sport now and all I had to do was apply the same approach that I do with the riders I coach and bike fit to myself, along with outside support from my coach James Millard and a couple of other very supportive people.”
George set his time aboard an Argon E-17 frame, with a Princeton 7580 wheel up front and a VeloElite 88mm at the rear. That eye-catching dinner plate of a chainring is a whopping 62t and the chain runs through one of Ceramic Speed’s (very expensive) aero pulley wheel systems.
The rear derailleur is Shimano Ultegra Di2 11-speed and the bars are Prime’s carbon aero offering in 36cm width for getting nice and tucked. The finishing kit includes a Syncros Belcarra carbon saddle, profile design Aria stem and Speedplay pedals.
George’s power meter shows he held a normalised power of 378w for the 18:41 mins of effort, hitting a maximum speed of 75.5km/h and averaging a cadence of 86, while his average heart rate was 182bpm, rising as high as 191bpm by the final metres.
55 thoughts on “How fast?! New road bike 10-mile time trial record set at 51.6km/h average speed for 18:41 clocking”
that’s some max aero /
that’s some max aero / conditions (I know it’s out and back but sidewind anything’s a sailing effect when your doing 50kmph) because no disrespect and I can’t but 378W for 18 minutes isn’t mutant power.
congratulations all the same though
check12 wrote:
It’s not going to win you the Tour de France, but it’s not that far off.
check12 wrote:
In an interview with Colin Sturgess he said he did 435w for a ’10’ in 2000, his final competitive season. Wiggins’ hour record ride was said to be about 420w (for more than 3 times the duration) while Ganna averaged over 500w for the 19 km stage 1 TT in the Giro on Saturday.
Sturgess’s 18:48 comp record was set on his standard steel road bike – Reynolds 753 frame and a Campagnolo C-Record groupset (downtube shifters!) with a 52×13 top gear and some 28-spoke time trial wheels. Info from a Cycling Weekly article about George Fox’s bike and last weekend’s ride. Fox had previously clocked 19:19 for a ’10’ on a Giant Propel in 2019.
I remember doing a local TT
I remember doing a local TT here in South Australia (flat one 18km, so just over 10mile), and Chris Harper did it on his climbing bike with shallow wheels and normal kit and helmet. He averaged over 50km/h, I think it was in that 51km/h area, I should try to find the results. Was bloody amazing to see
I also have one of these TT bikes and was keen to do the same to make it a crit machine, if I ever update my TT
One year Aussie MTB rider Dan
One year (around 2010?) Aussie MTB rider Dan McConnell was in the UK with the Torq team and clocked under 22 minutes for our local 10 mile TT on his XC race bike, apparently with knobblies. Jaws dropped in the pub that evening.
Sturgess was a great rider. I
Sturgess was a great rider. I saw him ride track a few times. The fact that his record wasn’t broken until now shows what an amazing ride his 18:48 was.
I sold Colin’s dad my track
I sold Colin’s dad my track frame – gold Zeus IIRC (Or a DHC) back when we were all in Joburg. Not sure if it was for Colin himself or for one of the other riders Colin’s dad was coaching. Scary thing is that was more than 40 years ago!
Zoomy and super impressive.
Zoomy and super impressive.
Congrats George Fox.
Great to see that the new
Great to see that the new Road Bike category is encouraging cyclists to ‘have a go’ as intended…. haha just joking.
George Speedyfox has been a force for a while, well done him as that’s a terrific time.
would be good to see him try
would be good to see him try on a ‘normal’ road bike so we can get a good benchmark comparison in the real world for a top rider.
Global Nomad wrote:
I believe a reasonable heuristic would be a saving of about 90 seconds over ten miles compared to a standard non-aero road bike.
Very impressive effort!
Very impressive effort!
The E-117 is a time trial frame, great idea putting drop bars on it. Looks very similar to the Nitrogen.
I am slightly challenged by
I am slightly challenged by this, as that bike isn’t really a road bike is it?
That position is not something you could spend any real time on comfortably, and it would be unlikely to handle descents, corners etc very effectively. The gearing is very specialist to out and back 10m tt’s.
For me, the appeal of the road bike category is that people that either can’t afford a tt rig, or roadies wanting to compete against fellow non-tt specialists can rock up on their normal road bike and have valid competition. This bike kinda kills that notion dead… Anyone can rock up on a road bike, as long as that road bike has been fully optimised for TT’s.
I agree, if the only
I agree, if the only stipulation is going to be no tri-bars it’s pretty pointless; I wonder if even now people are ordering extra long stems so that they can adopt a tri position without the bars.
(Not taking anything away from the absolutely amazing time and achievement though)
Rendel Harris wrote:
It’s just a good way for someone who otherwise would be in the middle of the pack to feel a sense of achievement in coming first for a change. He should be thankful he only had to lop off his handlebars. Some people lop off things that are far more valuable to achieve the same result.
ShutTheFrontDawes wrote:
Are you referring to George Fox?
Or maybe to Alex Dowsett, who is due to ride the Leo 30 mile TT in the road bike event this weekend.
So if they perform well are they ‘cheating’ by using the best equipment available to them? After all, the point of a TT is to go as fast as possible. The Argon 18 is also George’s road race bike, he said that the only thing he changed for the TT is the chainring.
But I guess it’s a tough pill to swallow for bitter individuals when they see people work hard to legitimately optimise their performances and enjoy some success.
Simon E wrote:
Are you referring to George Fox?
Or maybe to Alex Dowsett, who is due to ride the Leo 30 mile TT in the road bike event this weekend.
So if they perform well are they ‘cheating’ by using the best equipment available to them? After all, the point of a TT is to go as fast as possible. The Argon 18 is also George’s road race bike, he said that the only thing he changed for the TT is the chainring.
But I guess it’s a tough pill to swallow for bitter individuals when they see people work hard to legitimately optimise their performances and enjoy some success.— ShutTheFrontDawes
Riding a TT bike (albeit with the bars chopped) certainly was not in the spirit of the creation of the new road bike category.
I’m not at all surprised that he also uses that TT bike for other road races.
I’m just glad he didn’t take more extreme measures to feel the sense of achievement he so desperately craves.
ShutTheFrontDawes wrote:
Who said that (apart from you)?
What is “the spirit” of the new rules? Have you been party to the discussions or had any input? And how does his bike, which is used in BC road races, not fit the road bike criteria? The frame is probably one of the least critical major components in reducing CdA. Nevertheless, haters gonna hate.
Simon E wrote:
Who said that (apart from you)?
What is “the spirit” of the new rules? Have you been party to the discussions or had any input? And how does his bike, which is used in BC road races, not fit the road bike criteria? The frame is probably one of the least critical major components in reducing CdA. Nevertheless, haters gonna hate.— ShutTheFrontDawes
An organisation called Cycling Time Trials (heard of them?), who said that the change was to make “time trialling more accessible to everyone whatever type of bike they own.”
https://www.cyclingtimetrials.org.uk/pages/road-bikes
ShutTheFrontDawes wrote:
I most certainly have, been time trialling and marshalling since 2008 and organising TTs since 2013.
And what is wrong with the type of bike he owns? How is Fox’s choice of bike making TTs less accessible?
What is your involvement in the TT scene (apart from bitching)?
Simon E wrote:
I most certainly have, been time trialling and marshalling since 2008 and organising TTs since 2013.
And what is wrong with the type of bike he owns? How is Fox’s choice of bike making TTs less accessible?
What is your involvement in the TT scene (apart from bitching)?— ShutTheFrontDawes
Are you suggesting that George Fox didn’t own a TT bike before the change (he did) or was already very involved in TTing (he was) before the change was made?
The fact is, a new category was introduced to allow more riders to get involved, using their existing bikes.
Chopping the bars off a TT bike for the purpose of setting records in a new category wasn’t the aim. I’m not saying it’s not allowed (it is) or that any rules were broken (they weren’t). I just think it’s a bit sad.
ShutTheFrontDawes wrote:
Why is it sad?
He didn’t “chop” anything, he fitted road handlebars to a TT frame. It’s a shame that you have such a negative view of his achievements, whether on this bike, the Giant Propel he used previously to do 19:19 for 10 miles or his TT bikes. I never even suggested that he didn’t own a TT bike before riding the Argon as it’s entirely irrelevant, you’re just inventing more bollocks.
The rules do exactly what was intended, which is to give more opportunities and what some long time TTers have termed ‘better optics’ for time trialling while not being too restrictive. Perhaps you’d like to follow the UCI’s model and require frame approval stickers, sock height rules etc.
In beating Sturgess’s record from 1988 no-one (including Fox) is suggesting that it’s the same thing:
https://twitter.com/ColinASturgess/status/1655567161811763204
Do you feel the same way about Dan Bigham’s Hour record and team pursuit titles? He took aerodynamics to another level and has been very clear about the fact that he’s gone faster than more powerful/physically gifted riders because he has worked on so many little things, including (but not only) getting himself incredibly aero.
Perhaps you’d prefer to see an IQ ceiling placed on TT riders so they don’t think too much.
Simon E wrote:
Why is it sad?
He didn’t “chop” anything, he fitted road handlebars to a TT frame. It’s a shame that you have such a negative view of his achievements, whether on this bike, the Giant Propel he used previously to do 19:19 for 10 miles or his TT bikes. I never even suggested that he didn’t own a TT bike before riding the Argon as it’s entirely irrelevant, you’re just inventing more bollocks.
The rules do exactly what was intended, which is to give more opportunities and what some long time TTers have termed ‘better optics’ for time trialling while not being too restrictive. Perhaps you’d like to follow the UCI’s model and require frame approval stickers, sock height rules etc.
In beating Sturgess’s record from 1988 no-one (including Fox) is suggesting that it’s the same thing:
https://twitter.com/ColinASturgess/status/1655567161811763204
Do you feel the same way about Dan Bigham’s Hour record and team pursuit titles? He took aerodynamics to another level and has been very clear about the fact that he’s gone faster than more powerful/physically gifted riders because he has worked on so many little things, including (but not only) getting himself incredibly aero.
Perhaps you’d prefer to see an IQ ceiling placed on TT riders so they don’t think too much.— ShutTheFrontDawes
I think it’s sad that people feel the need to leverage a new category and play within the hair’s breadth of the ‘rules’ to win records, yes. Especially when the new category was all about making TT cycling less elitist and exclusive.
The hour record was not aimed at creating a more accessible sector of the sport, so no, it’s not a fair comparison. That’s like comparing Le Mans to junior go-karting.
ShutTheFrontDawes wrote:
So you mean that you don’t like the premise behind competitive sport. Perhaps people shouldn’t training manuals or scientific journals, buy nice (faster) kit, just pedal their 6-speed Raleigh hard and be grateful.
There’s nothing “hair’s breadth” about it, those are the rules, which are intentionally open-ended. The bike is clearly within those rules, as are all the aero bikes, 88mm wheels and expensive skinsuits people can choose to use.
This is an extreme outlier, a performance by a talented athlete (2nd behind Dowsett with 18:05 last year) and you just can’t handle it. It does not harm the intention of CTT and is likely a positive bit of publicity, though it seems it was not done/timed for that reason.
Unless individual promoters want to mandate additional restrictions (known as Special Conditions in CTT parlance) then this is what is allowed for everyone, whether they can do 380 watts or 180 watts, whether they spend £500 or £5,000. It’s the real world, get used to it cry-baby.
That comparison is so full of shit I don’t know where to begin…
Simon E wrote:
So you mean that you don’t like the premise behind competitive sport. Perhaps people shouldn’t training manuals or scientific journals, buy nice (faster) kit, just pedal their 6-speed Raleigh hard and be grateful.
There’s nothing “hair’s breadth” about it, those are the rules, which are intentionally open-ended. The bike is clearly within those rules, as are all the aero bikes, 88mm wheels and expensive skinsuits people can choose to use.
This is an extreme outlier, a performance by a talented athlete (2nd behind Dowsett with 18:05 last year) and you just can’t handle it. It does not harm the intention of CTT and is likely a positive bit of publicity, though it seems it was not done/timed for that reason.
Unless individual promoters want to mandate additional restrictions (known as Special Conditions in CTT parlance) then this is what is allowed for everyone, whether they can do 380 watts or 180 watts, whether they spend £500 or £5,000. It’s the real world, get used to it cry-baby.
That comparison is so full of shit I don’t know where to begin…— ShutTheFrontDawes
Well since you seem to know so much about it, was the new category introduced so that:
a) people who previously didn’t get involved in TTs because they felt they didn’t have the ‘right’ kit would be more inclined to have a go; or,
b) so that washed up athletes could set new records.
Which?
ShutTheFrontDawes wrote:
Another post so full of shit.
Do you mean this ‘washed-up’ athlete who clocked 19:19 on a standard Propel in 2019?
https://twitter.com/georgefox07/status/1133699488227483648
I really cannot understand how George Fox’s performances deter anyone from participating in a TT. Either you’ve failed to understand anything I’ve written in this discussion or you are simply desperate to argue for no obvious reason (and with no factual basis to your ridiculous comments). Based on experience, I think it’s the latter.
Simon E wrote:
Another post so full of shit.
Do you mean this ‘washed-up’ athlete who clocked 19:19 on a standard Propel in 2019?
https://twitter.com/georgefox07/status/1133699488227483648
I really cannot understand how George Fox’s performances deter anyone from participating in a TT. Either you’ve failed to understand anything I’ve written in this discussion or you are simply desperate to argue for no obvious reason (and with no factual basis to your ridiculous comments). Based on experience, I think it’s the latter.— ShutTheFrontDawes
That was 4 years ago. Not much since until a new category is introduced that can be leveraged. You’re proving my point.
2022 – 19.06 On a propel with
2022 – 19.06 On a propel with 65/60mm wheels and a road helmet
2020 – 19.31 on the same setup as above
2019 – 19.18 on the propel with 50mm wheels and Tt helmet
All of the above off 30w less than the 18.41.
I have consistently spoken about breaking this time for the last 5 years now, it just so happens that the CTT introduced the new category for road bikes this year. I chose to align my goals with their new rules rather than sticking to the approach I’d done previously with regards to equipment use.
I’d have been happy with my ride and nobody else knowing about it to be quite honest, but as has been pointed out, it’s my business. I justify my time training as it positively impacts what I do day to day when I do get results, that’s the sole reason for doing the interviews. So no, it’s not glory hunting, it’s not comparing to Colin’s ride, there really is no ulterior motive to this other than to ride fast and see what is possible for myself and the equipment I choose and am allowed to use. Hope that clears a few of your opinions up ??
Well that
Well that ShushedTheFrontDawes…
Sorry, I’ll get me coat.
ShutTheFrontDawes wrote:
Maybe the tough pill to swallow would be you accepting that George Fox is very athletically gifted? He was winning time trials as soon he started with them.
Miller wrote:
Maybe the tough pill to swallow would be you accepting that George Fox is very athletically gifted? He was winning time trials as soon he started with them.
— ShutTheFrontDawes
I wasn’t aware that he’d set records in existing categories. I’ll have to look that up.
Under the latest BC Cooms
Under the latest BC Comms guidence his postion on the bars would see him DQ’d in a RR.
ShutTheFrontDawes wrote:
Well, I for one enjoyed this completely gratuitous dig at the male also-rans (if that) taking podium places in women’s races.
I think this particular bike
I think this particular bike falls within the letter of the road bike rules, rather than the spirit perhaps. The rules being no tri-bars, no clip-on bars, no disc wheels, max rim depth 90mm, and both wheels have at least 12 spokes. This bike fulfils that, but for all other intents, is a TT bike for most people.
Bearing in mind the rider’s day job of coaching and bike-fitting, this (amazing) effort represents and promotes a showcase of what’s possible rather than a realistic target for the average club rider turning up on a Tuesday evening and paying their £5 to the timekeeper. In fact, it’s the opposite, it’s an incentive for the person turning up on a P5X desparately trying to break 20 minutes!
Previous “Road Bike” TTs I’ve
Previous “Road Bike” TTs I’ve ridden (like the Merlin Series road bike category) have specified rim depths of 50mm or less and no stupid helmets (no visors / ears uncovered etc). This bike is taking the p*ss. Great ride, but not really what CTT are aiming for. Maybe the rules as such need tweaked.
It’s not taking the piss. As
It’s not taking the piss. As soon as you devise a contest with a set of rules, competitive people find a way to explore the outer reaches of those rules. Many, many people have pointed out that this would happen in ‘road bike’ time-trialling.
More to the point, that Colin Sturgess 1980s record looks better and better if all this tech and a fast course and a strong rider shaves just 7 seconds off it.
Miller wrote:
Agree.
CTT wanted to implement as few rules as possible; they were also conscious of BC/UCI rules about things like wheel depth.
It’s inevitable that TT frames and wheels that are just inside the max permitted would be used. That’s life. Personally I’d prefer a road bike category to be non-aero and something like 50mm max rim but that would probably be a little too restrictive and could discourage people with expensive bikes and 60mm carbon wheels (claim people with expensive bikes and deep wheels AND a full TT rig, expensive skinsuit etc etc). And it seems that nowadays even commuters and recreational riders happily buy aero handlebars, deep rims, low CRR tyres etc.
At least this way there are very few restrictions on what you can ride; and let’s be honest, unless you’re at the sharp end of an Open then you are really only racing against yourself.
Hmmm. Aero road bars on a TT
Hmmm. Aero road bars on a TT bike isn’t really a “road bike” is it? Not sure how an immediate arms race in the road bike category combats the idea of a cheap, less threatening and intimidating entry point.
Personally I’d prefer rules that stated no TT frames, wheels up to 50mm, at least that would indicate a genuine “road racing” bike and no aero helmets.
The potential newbie looking at that is still adding up £10k+ to be top end competitive. Not exactly an encouragement to start is it?
I’ve done a few TTs and only
I’ve done a few TTs and only ever on a road bike in ‘normal’ roady gear. TTs to my mind are races against the clock/self as you know what you’re aiming for so I don’t think people should feel intimidated by others with rocket-ship rigs. I remember they did a road bike TT stage in Tour of Qatar 2015, was very interesting, albeit over 11km. Winner managed 46.5kmh.
Anything around 40kmh is decent on a normal road bike over a 10, to my mind.
Id be very interested to see what George could do on a normal road bike and gear.
You can be a used TT frame
You can be a used TT frame that would be slower than some modern aero road bikes. You can buy a ‘road’ helmet that’s faster than a older TT helmet. So how and where do you draw the lines? This is a great step because it does lower the barrier to entry and at least attempt to make a slightly more level playing field.
monkeymike wrote:
As with everything else in the human world these days, sport has been suborned by rabid capitalists using the traditions of various physical competitions to sell more stuff. You can be a winnah! if you’ve got the dosh and are willing to spend it on the latest go-faster gubbins albeit often including some mere go-faster stripes (even more money but only for looks).
Were bike racing to be a true sport, measuring the skills, determination and abilities required of the riders and nothing else, the bicycles would be highy standardised, with no variations other than sizing to fit the riders. Instead, there’s a competition of wallet size and of technologies.
“Race against the self”? Only at how fast you can empty your wallet over the shiny gubbins counter. Well, a bit harsh that. Many competitors do try very hard and do have great abilities. It’s a pity they’ve been persuaded to cheat by use of gubbins, though. 🙂
Some sports are still largely about the physical abilities of the competitors. It’s difficult (although not althogether impossible) to make swimming races highly dependent on the swimming costumes. A good thing too.
Cugel wrote:
That’s Japanese Keirin racing. They race on highly standardised bikes. Nobody watches it for the thrill of the sport though, it’s a downmarket betting game, like greyhounds.
Cugel wrote:
I have a little sympathy but I think this horse was out of the stable a very long time ago! If it’s capitalism you’re concerned about let’s not forget that while the original TdF was “low-tech” by today’s standards a large part of its raison d’etre was to flog newspapers! People have been wanting “the pro’s bike” / gear for time.
Swimming is maybe not such a clear example either – technology marches on there also.
The good thing about many sports is you can start with little and enjoy them. Plus if you’ve got talent you can make some progress. On the flip side even for sports apparently without much “kit”, at the top levels you’re still going to need increasingly large sums of money for access to trainers and training facilities etc.
chrisonatrike wrote:
When I were a lad, 383 years ago, it was easy to take up many sports, even cycling, as necessary equipment didn’t usually cost 6 months average wages. (There were exceptions, even then – polo; carriage driving). Most trime trialists, for example, used a fixed wheel bike with perhaps only one or three with tubs and their wheels a bit exotic and potentially pricey – although you could buy the cheaper ones of those too.
There was one lad who had made his own frame of, literally, welded gas pipe! A horrible machine but he still managed 24 minute tens on it. He was admired, for ingenuity and athletic ability, despite the gas pipe, since there still was an overall ethos of “racing against yourself” in them olden days.
At the last local club-organised crit race I attended (just to take photos, not to race) some 5 years ago, every bike was a super-exotic costing at least £5000 and often more. The mad helmets and skin suits added another large chunk of expense. No one was racing on a standard road bike, anyway.
Don’t get me wrong; I’m an avid buyer of the latest improved gubbins albeit of the standard sort rather than the exotics. (E.g. 105 type stuff not DuraAce). But cycle sport should be about the athletes, not the equipment. Better equipment is for we tourists and others needing a helping gubbin to get home before dark.
Professional racing, of course, is a shop window-cum-circus. Sport of a kind but more like big tent daring-doings with dangerous wild beasts and hire-wire antics than a sporting competition between ordinary folk.
Cugel wrote:
I’m glad to hear it! Perhaps further proof of the health benefits of life-long cycling.
At the last local club-organised crit race I attended (just to take photos, not to race) some 5 years ago, every bike was a super-exotic costing at least £5000 and often more. The mad helmets and skin suits added another large chunk of expense. No one was racing on a standard road bike, anyway.— Cugel
Devil’s advocate, but was the home-made bike chap an international competitor? Also – on the “now everyone races with the expensive kit” isn’t this just a measure of inflation? What fraction of the average income was a good race machine and kit back in the day?
Thankfully there are lots of places to compete and indeed lots of types of contest. If you favour a more DIY ethic in cycle racing I can recommend the British Human Power Club. Former alumni include Mike Burrows.
On “cheating” – I don’t
On “cheating” – I don’t really know about this one but I note that the UCI has been busily heading some technologies off at the pass since at least 1933!
Cugel wrote:
Keirin in Japan gets this. The bikes and equipment are standardised. The bikes especially so. Everyone is technologically identical steel track bikes, little different from bikes from the 60s.
And precisely to prevent ability of people to influence the racing with money. Cause… Keirin largely exists to facilitate betting and gambling in Japan. 😉
I’d love to see the pros in road racing all on standardised bikes. Preferably traditional steel framed bikes. 😉 Would be great.
And those sock… this is not
And those sock… this is not football, sir.
Good video here from GCN,
Good video here from GCN, with Si attempting a sub 20 on a road bike. They reckoned around 370w is needed.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X7zZ4OROgeQ
62T Chainring – feck me
62T Chainring – feck me
I need all the help I can get
I need all the help I can get . Plus there is something rather special about getting it right on a TT bike . It doesn’t happen that often for me but when it does it is worth the effort and expense . But don’t worry I am still way down the field . For me it is just about bettering my own times on different courses and I am happy with that . Shame some people have to try and spoil it by invoking a non existent TT ethical universe where I assume even pedalling hard would be frowned upon .
Bear in mind that the CTT’s
Bear in mind that the CTT’s new rule is exactly that: new. It will no doubt be revised in the light of experience to try to keep the bar as low as reasonably possible. At least the right intention exists, there will always be those who sail as close to the wind as possible.
The CTT AGM road bike proposal did include a restriction on TT style aero helmets. I know it was discussed but not sure why it didn’t make it into the rules. In the CTT West District we include that restriction in all our road bike events.
mbrads72 wrote:
C’mon, you did that on purpose!
I think people just need to
I think people just need to remember the purpose of a time trial; us against the clock. It Wasn’t really that many years ago that TT’s were ridden on road bikes, some geometry/ angles may have been tighter but. It is about what we can do on our bikes, or with our budget.
Good on George, good on all who go and ride. I’m off to do my first TT in 3 1/2 years since heart problems, doing it to see if I and my old Scala hold up. Let’s just enjoy the sport.
Good on George, good on all
Good on George, good on all who go and ride
Agreed!