Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Jail for motorist, 84, who killed cyclist after being told not to drive due to failing eyesight

John Johnstone had twice been told to give up licence in months before crash near Aviemore that claimed Hanno Garbe's life...

An 84-year-old motorist who killed a cyclist after he continued to drive despite twice being told to surrender his driving licence due to his failing eyesight has been jailed for 32 months.

Sentencing John Johnstone at the High Court in Edinburgh, Lord Fairlie said that only a custodial sentence was suitable, reports BBC News Scotland.

Johnstone, from Kingussie, last month admitted causing the death by dangerous driving of 57-year-old Hanno Garbe near Aviemore in March last year.

The judge, who banned Johnstone from driving for five years and four months, told him that had he not pleaded guilty and been convicted by a jury, he would have been sentenced to four years’ imprisonment.

He added: “You continued to drive a motor car when it was plainly dangerous for you to do so.”

Speaking in mitigation on behalf of Johnstone, defence solicitor-advocate Marco Guarino said: "It is difficult to underestimate how hard it has been for him to come to terms with what has happened. It has had a profound effect upon him.

“He has indicated to me that he wishes to apologise most profoundly to Mr Garbe's widow and his extended family.”

He said that his client had passed his driving test in 1958 and head no prior convictions and unsuccessfully sought to convince the judge that it was a “very unique case” and that a custodial sentence should not be handed down.

“He has not driven since, his licence has been revoked and there is no prospect of him ever driving again,” he said.

However, the judge insisted that only a prison sentence was appropriate given that Johnstone had twice been told not to drive due to the deterioration in his vision.

Mr Garbe, who worked as a sales manager and had moved from Germany to the Aviemore area with his wife Dagmar in 2007, died of head injuries at Raigmore Hospital in Inverness.

Following the crash on the B9152 near Loch Alvie, a roadside eye test carried out by police found that the driver was only able to read a registration plate from a distance of 4.8 metres, instead of the 20 metres required by law.

Johnstone, who said that he had not seen the cyclist, had previously been told by optometrist Ellen Torrance during an annual eye examination at Specsavers in Inverness in October 2018 not to drive because he had cataracts in both eyes.

At his trial last month, advocate depute Alex Prentice QC told the High Court: “The accused was aware that he could not drive until after a successful cataract operation. As at March 4 in 2019 he had not had the operation.”

“He stated he was struggling with watching television, following the ball when playing golf and also driving.”

“At the conclusion of the eye examination Ellen Torrance told the accused that he had a big drop in his distance vision and a cataract in his right and left eyes.”

“She concluded the accused did not meet the driving standards and told the accused he could not lawfully drive, must not drive and must notify DVLA of his condition.”

Two months later, he attended an eye clinic at Raigmore Hospital, which reached the same conclusion.  

As in England & Wales, while medical professionals such as GPs in Scotland can advise someone to surrender their driving licence to the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency as a result of health conditions including poor eyesight, they cannot compel them to do so.

In its webpage entitled Surrendering your driving licence, the government says:

There’s no legal age at which you must stop driving. You can decide when to stop, but medical conditions can affect your driving and might mean you have to give up your driving licence until you can meet the medical standards of fitness to drive again.

When you decide to stop driving or are advised by your doctor to stop you’ll need to tell DVLA and send them your licence.

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

38 comments

Avatar
kil0ran | 3 years ago
8 likes

Wow, a surprisingly tough sentence for once. Bearing in mind he pleaded guilty too (although I don't know if the discount system applies in Scotland?)

Avatar
Secret_squirrel replied to kil0ran | 3 years ago
7 likes

Reading between the lines - he plead guilty after the trial was scheduled/during the trial thus causing the extra costs of a jury trial and court sitting, thats always worth a bit more on the sentence.

Avatar
giff77 replied to kil0ran | 3 years ago
7 likes

The judge stated that if the case had have gone before a jury Johnstone would have been facing 4 years imprisonment so that's pretty much 25% discount. Though the cynic in me says a jury may not have delivered a guilty verdict! 

Hopefully this sends out a clear message to motorists here in Scotland that the courts can be serious about dangerous driving! 

Avatar
wtjs replied to giff77 | 3 years ago
2 likes
giff77 wrote:

Though the cynic in me says a jury may not have delivered a guilty verdict! 

;

It's not unduly cynical! Any jury is likely to consist of a great majority of non-cyclists. The discussion is about how many of them are cyclist-haters who think 'well, you're bound to kill the odd one every now and then'. Our other problem is that the police, in England at least, think that way as well.

Avatar
EddyBerckx | 3 years ago
5 likes

Some element of justice for once!

Avatar
billymansell | 3 years ago
13 likes

"the driver was only able to read a registration plate from a distance of 4.8 metres, instead of the 20 metres"

Good riddance you murderous scum. Just like all other criminal drivers he put his right to drive above the lives' of others.

Avatar
Rick_Rude replied to billymansell | 3 years ago
10 likes

I think your hyperbole setting is on 11. He's not a murderer, there are plenty of actual murderers already out there and he's not one of those.

To a point old people become like children in old age. I am dealing with it right now, both are stubborn even though one nearly died already this year and the other has dementia. It's all Dunkirk spirit and sometimes just utter nonsense. I've been told that people born during the war don't need eat as much as people now.... Luckily the dementia one can't remember where she put most things so the car keys are out of reach where only I know. Because of coronavirus we never got a formal diagnosis as all appointments got cancelled.

End result is you are not dealing with a malice of forethought with a lot of old people. What REALLY needs to happen is a change in the law allowing dialogue between the DVLA and the medical practitioners.

Avatar
brooksby | 3 years ago
11 likes

Quote:

... the judge insisted that only a prison sentence was appropriate given that Johnstone had twice been told not to drive due to the deterioration in his vision.

Good.

Pages

Latest Comments