Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

Former Downing Street chief of staff denies buying £1,000 cycling kit with taxpayer money

Dan Rosenfield said it was "total nonsense" after the political advisor was accused of billing the taxpayer for his new kit...

A former Downing Street chief of staff was last night embroiled in scandal over allegations taxpayers' money was used for £1,000 of cycling kit.

Dan Rosenfield worked as Prime Minister Boris Johnson's chief of staff between January 2021 and February 2022, resigning earlier this month during the 'Partygate' scandal.

But now the former political advisor has been accused of billing the taxpayer for cycling clothing and a fridge for his Whitehall office.

The allegations were published by the Daily Mail, with a source saying: "There was a row when he billed about £1,000 worth of cycling clothes to the taxpayer and did the same for a fridge, which, given the row over the use of wine fridges for parties in there, was a bit much."

The Mail used a photo of Mr Rosenfield wearing Rapha kit while arriving at Downing Street in October to illustrate the story.

However, the ex-chief of staff denies the accusations and insisted it was "total nonsense" to say he had claimed back the cost of the kit, but declined to comment when asked if he had used expenses for any type of clothes or a fridge.

In December, The Times alleged Mr Rosenfield was present at a Downing Street Christmas party in December 2020, hosted by head of the civil service — Simon Case.

Number 10 denied rumours but the former chief of staff eventually resigned earlier this month.

It is not the first cycling-related controversy to hit Downing Street during Johnson's premiership.

Last January, the Prime Minister was accused of breaking lockdown restrictions by going for a bike ride at Stratford's Olympic Park.

Dan is the road.cc news editor and joined in 2020 having previously written about nearly every other sport under the sun for the Express, and the weird and wonderful world of non-league football for The Non-League Paper. Dan has been at road.cc for four years and mainly writes news and tech articles as well as the occasional feature. He has hopefully kept you entertained on the live blog too.

Never fast enough to take things on the bike too seriously, when he's not working you'll find him exploring the south of England by two wheels at a leisurely weekend pace, or enjoying his favourite Scottish roads when visiting family. Sometimes he'll even load up the bags and ride up the whole way, he's a bit strange like that.

Add new comment

29 comments

Avatar
LastBoyScout | 2 years ago
0 likes

Can't you claim clothing on the cycle to work scheme?

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to LastBoyScout | 2 years ago
0 likes

LastBoyScout wrote:

Can't you claim clothing on the cycle to work scheme?

Should just be cycle and cycle related safety equipment - maybe if the clothing has some hi-viz on it, it could count. Doesn't appear to cover unicycles.

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/845725/cycle-to-work-guidance.pdf

Avatar
mdavidford replied to hawkinspeter | 2 years ago
1 like

hawkinspeter wrote:

LastBoyScout wrote:

Can't you claim clothing on the cycle to work scheme?

Should just be cycle and cycle related safety equipment - maybe if the clothing has some hi-viz on it, it could count. Doesn't appear to cover unicycles.

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/845725/cycle-to-work-guidance.pdf

'Safety' stretches further than you might expect, though.

  • Cycle helmets which conform to European standard BSEN1078
  • Bells and bulb horns
  • Lights, including dynamo packs
  • Mirrors and mudguards to ensure riders’ visibility is not impaired
  • Cycle clips and dress guards
  • Panniers, luggage carriers and straps to allow luggage to be safely carried
  • Child safety seats
  • Locks and chains to ensure the cycle can be safely secured
  • Pumps, puncture repair kits, cycle tool kits and tyre sealant to allow for minor repairs
  • Replacement parts to keep a cycle roadworthy
  • Adaptations for disability/mobility issues.
  • Reflective clothing or reflective cycle equipment, e.g. spoke reflectors

In practice, it tends to be anything that could reasonably be considered to be necessary to encourage you to cycle, and isn't blatantly taking the piss. Our provider has, for instance, included trailers in their 'roadshows', even though they're not specifically covered above.

Avatar
wycombewheeler replied to mdavidford | 2 years ago
0 likes

mdavidford wrote:

 

  • Panniers, luggage carriers and straps to allow luggage to be safely carried

Our provider has, for instance, included trailers in their 'roadshows', even though they're not specifically covered above.

Trailer could be considered to be a luggage carrier?

Avatar
mdavidford replied to wycombewheeler | 2 years ago
0 likes

Not sure it meets the emphasis on required for safety, though, particularly for most people working office jobs. That's kind of the point, though - if it's likely to persuade you to shift to cycling, it's probably going to be OK; if you try to use it to buy a whole new high-end cycling wardrobe, they might start questioning it.

Avatar
HoarseMann | 2 years ago
4 likes

A few hundred quid on cycle clothing could save the taxpayer thousands in taxi fares. Not to mention time saved, as I'm sure cycling is quicker in London. Certainly easier to justify than a wine fridge, but I suspect not quite within the rules!

Avatar
capedcrusader replied to HoarseMann | 2 years ago
4 likes

You do know that you can wear any clothing to ride a bike on a commute? 

And the difference being saving money and fraud?

Avatar
Adam Sutton replied to capedcrusader | 2 years ago
1 like
capedcrusader wrote:

You do know that you can wear any clothing to ride a bike on a commute? 

And the difference being saving money and fraud?

I have grease marks on jeans to prove that!

Avatar
HoarseMann replied to Adam Sutton | 2 years ago
5 likes

Pfft. Get yourself a chainguard or you're not a proper urban commuter! 

I end up wearing jeans out in the arse area from riding round town. It quickly gets expensive, not to mention uncomfortable, if you're going any distance. There is a point where it's worth using proper cycling clothing on longer commutes.

I appreciate it's not within the rules, but what is within the rules is sometimes of questionable value.

Avatar
Adam Sutton replied to HoarseMann | 2 years ago
4 likes

I went old school fluorescent cycle clips, LOL. Jeans were fine for the few miles to the train station, but I hear you on anything further. I resisted cycle gear for a while, but it makes sense.

I think we should be more concerned with Liz Truss' private jet bill TBH.

Avatar
HoarseMann replied to Adam Sutton | 2 years ago
4 likes

Adam Sutton wrote:

I think we should be more concerned with Liz Truss' private jet bill TBH.

I wonder if she got her fur hat and coat for the Russia trip on expenses? When I was in the civil service, you could claim a clothing allowance for a business trip that involved a harsh climate!

Avatar
Adam Sutton replied to HoarseMann | 2 years ago
1 like
HoarseMann wrote:

Adam Sutton wrote:

I think we should be more concerned with Liz Truss' private jet bill TBH.

I wonder if she got her fur hat and coat for the Russia trip on expenses? When I was in the civil service, you could claim a clothing allowance for a business trip that involved a harsh climate!

Yeesh. When I had to go to Oslo for a week in winter all I got was an economy ticket and had to buy my own thermals 😂

Avatar
giff77 replied to Adam Sutton | 2 years ago
1 like

I find both bicycle  clips or a chain guard prevent that. Don't think I've ever ruined any of my clothes over the years. Or are you a member for f the velomati who shun such accoutrements as they demean cycling. 

Avatar
Adam Sutton replied to giff77 | 2 years ago
1 like

Cycle clips work for the most part, but I'm forgetful 🙁

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to Adam Sutton | 2 years ago
1 like

Socks. Although that doesn't help when it comes to locking - that'll transfer muck to your hands. Particularly if you've a chain with a fabric cover to protect the frame from chips and scratches.

The "answer" - if you're not going too far / fast / up mountains - is something like one of these (or the stepthrough version more likely). (I've never tried one but some people rate belt-drives for cleanness too.)

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to chrisonabike | 2 years ago
0 likes

As long as you don't have a deraillieur you can also use a much lighter chain case too - keeps your chain (and cogs) going longer too.

Avatar
Sheen wheels replied to Adam Sutton | 2 years ago
1 like

Horse spats - much better coverage! Proviz used to sell some. 

Avatar
Miller replied to HoarseMann | 2 years ago
5 likes

In the Before Times when I had a cycle commute, I bought any required cycle clothing with my own money. Is that considered hopelessly old school nowadays?

Avatar
HoarseMann replied to Miller | 2 years ago
1 like

Well I did too! I'm not condoning it (if it actually happened), as I suspect it will be against the rules, just stepping back a bit and evaluating it in a broader context.

Encouraging people to cycle to work by providing some cycling clothing might not be a bad idea and could actually save money in the long run. Compared with seasonal train ticket on expenses, taxis, tube, private school education, all no bother, it doesn't seem as dubious as a wine fridge!

Avatar
OldRidgeback replied to Miller | 2 years ago
2 likes

Miller wrote:

In the Before Times when I had a cycle commute, I bought any required cycle clothing with my own money. Is that considered hopelessly old school nowadays?

No it's still normal behaviour for most people. Sponging off the state is more a symptom of this current government and the various hangers-on (advisers).

Avatar
IanMK | 2 years ago
12 likes

He was going to buy the kit on the cycle to work scheme but realised he wouldn't be able to hold the job down for long enough.

Avatar
eburtthebike | 2 years ago
16 likes

So utterly typical of the DM; £billions go missing in PPE, hundreds of millions go to the government's mates, but they are worried about £1,000 in cycling gear.

Avatar
Milkfloat replied to eburtthebike | 2 years ago
12 likes

It is quite possible for both to be wrong, but one is an easy story against a man who is taking the fall for the PM, whilst the massive elephant in the room would need proper investigative journalists willing to go against their paymasters. 

Avatar
pockstone | 2 years ago
9 likes

If he's spending taxpayer's money, at least he could get his gear at Aldi.

(Let's hear it for 'levelling down'.)

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to pockstone | 2 years ago
2 likes

pockstone wrote:

If he's spending taxpayer's money, at least he could get his gear at Aldi.

(Let's hear it for 'levelling down'.)

How much Rapha kit can you even get for £1,000?

Avatar
Rendel Harris replied to hawkinspeter | 2 years ago
14 likes

hawkinspeter wrote:

How much Rapha kit can you even get for £1,000?

Socks. Really nice socks.

Avatar
S13SFC replied to hawkinspeter | 2 years ago
3 likes

Special edition bib shorts and a cap.

Avatar
bendertherobot replied to hawkinspeter | 2 years ago
0 likes

hawkinspeter wrote:

pockstone wrote:

If he's spending taxpayer's money, at least he could get his gear at Aldi.

(Let's hear it for 'levelling down'.)

How much Rapha kit can you even get for £1,000?

6.89 sets of the jersey and shorts pictured.

Avatar
Sheen wheels replied to hawkinspeter | 2 years ago
2 likes

You could get a pair of those nice titanium mudguards reviewed elsewhere. 
Not much change for the bike, though.

Latest Comments