Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

Highway Code changes: Department for Transport finally announces publicity campaign to increase awareness

In an online quiz on the new Highway Code revisions, a quarter of the respondents failed to answer half of the questions correctly

The Department for Transport has announced the launch of a £500,000 publicity campaign to raise awareness of the impending revisions to the Highway Code – three days before they are due to come into effect.

The communications drive, which will be operated by the government’s long-standing road safety campaign Think!, aims to raise awareness of the changes and ensure that “road-users across the country understand their responsibilities”. The government says the campaign will run across radio and social media, and will carry on through the summer.

The government has been strongly criticised in recent weeks for what many view as its inability to effectively communicate to the public the key changes being made to the Highway Code. Earlier this month a poll of more than 13,700 AA members found that one in three did not know that the Highway Code is being changed.

In an online quiz created by national law firm Irwin Mitchell and designed to test the public’s understanding of the new changes, a quarter of the 3,500 participants failed to answer half of the questions correctly, while only 10 percent scored full marks.  

> Public must be told about Highway Code changes, says Cycling UK

Labour MP Louise Haigh, the Shadow Transport Secretary, said last week that the changes to the Highway Code would be “totally meaningless” if people were not made aware of them.

Charity Cycling UK welcomed the government’s announcement, which it hopes will “herald the beginning of a long-term, well-funded awareness campaign”.

“The latest changes to the Highway Code are a hugely important start towards making the roads safer for everyone. We now need these to be communicated with simple, accurate, and memorable messaging,” said Duncan Dollimore, Cycling UK’s head of campaigns.

“The AA put out startling figures about the amount of people who don’t know about the forthcoming changes. These changes will help save lives but people need to be informed – they can’t be expected to telepathically know about them. That defeats the purpose of the new rules.

“Over the past weeks there has been considerable confusion and some erroneous reporting about these changes. While the government is late to the party in correcting these, Cycling UK is pleased to see a financial commitment, at least in the short term, to communicating the changes.

“People didn’t change their attitude to wearing seat belts and drink driving overnight, and many won’t change their behaviour the next day simply because new Highway Code rules have been introduced. This THINK campaign must herald the beginning of a long-term well-funded awareness campaign to ensure the new rules and the reasons for them are understood and accepted.”

> Highway Code changes: ‘What about cyclists, or do the rules not apply to them?’

Judging by the government’s announcement today, the DfT’s campaign will focus on the new hierarchy of road users, advice for cyclists in different situations, and encouraging the adoption of the ‘Dutch Reach’ method of opening car doors.

“A hierarchy of road-users will be introduced this weekend,” the statement reads, “ensuring quicker or heavier modes of travel have the greatest responsibility to reduce the danger or threat they may pose to others on the road.

“Cyclists will also receive fresh guidance to ride in the centre of a lane on quieter roads, in slower-moving traffic and at the approach to junctions in order to make themselves as clearly visible as possible. They’ll also be reminded they can ride two abreast – as has always been the case and which can be safer in large groups or with children – but they must be aware of drivers behind them and allow them to overtake if it is safe to do so.

“Meanwhile motorists will be encouraged to adopt the so-called 'Dutch Reach', opening the door next to them with the opposite hand so they look over their shoulder, meaning they’re less likely to injure passing cyclists and pedestrians.”

Ryan joined road.cc in December 2021 and since then has kept the site’s readers and listeners informed and enthralled (well at least occasionally) on news, the live blog, and the road.cc Podcast. After boarding a wrong bus at the world championships and ruining a good pair of jeans at the cyclocross, he now serves as road.cc’s senior news writer. Before his foray into cycling journalism, he wallowed in the equally pitiless world of academia, where he wrote a book about Victorian politics and droned on about cycling and bikes to classes of bored students (while taking every chance he could get to talk about cycling in print or on the radio). He can be found riding his bike very slowly around the narrow, scenic country lanes of Co. Down.

Add new comment

12 comments

Avatar
Hirsute | 2 years ago
4 likes

Just come across this:

"Question for you - giving way to pedestrians at junctions. If I'm coming off a main road to a side road, my concern is interrupting the flow of the main road especially if it's a higher speed road, your view?"

If you are that concerned, leave your car at home; do not turn off a main road; return your licence; pay for some driving lessons and pass your test.

Avatar
brooksby | 2 years ago
0 likes

Looking at https://www.gov.uk/government/news/the-highway-code-8-changes-you-need-t... says "The code will clarify that when people cycling are going straight ahead at a junction, they have priority over traffic waiting to turn into or out of a side road, unless road signs or markings indicate otherwise."

So, the 'give way' markings they put on the shared path alongside the A369, so that people turning in and out of the Clifton Sports Club complex don't have to give way to people actually using the path, will still apply?  Damn.

 

 

Avatar
iandusud | 2 years ago
2 likes

“Over the past weeks there has been considerable confusion and some erroneous reporting about these changes. While the government is late to the party in correcting these, Cycling UK is pleased to see a financial commitment, at least in the short term, to communicating the changes."

It's the only party this government has been accused of being late for!

Avatar
brooksby replied to iandusud | 2 years ago
4 likes

Are we even sure it was a party?

Avatar
marmotte27 replied to brooksby | 2 years ago
2 likes

They've been ambushed with a code...

Avatar
wtjs | 2 years ago
6 likes

Unreasonable criticism of the DfT from several quarters here- there was no point starting the campaign earlier because of the limited memory and attention-span of many drivers. Most of them will ignore the changes anyway, until something happens to people who disregard the changes- many police officers are determined that nothing whatsoever will happen to drivers ignoring the new rules as they apply to driver interaction with cyclists, just as they ignore such rules already in place. In many respects, the police is the official opposition to the DfT.

Avatar
quiff replied to wtjs | 2 years ago
4 likes

wtjs wrote:

Unreasonable criticism of the DfT from several quarters here- there was no point starting the campaign earlier because of the limited memory and attention-span of many drivers. 

And because the changes hadn't passed through Parliament. The government did say earlier in Jan that the campaign wouldn't launch until Feb. Though that doesn't seem to have stopped them briefing the press on the changes first. Does seem very odd to let the press have a go first, then do the official communications.

DfT announcement is here.    

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to wtjs | 2 years ago
1 like

wtjs wrote:

Unreasonable criticism of the DfT from several quarters here- there was no point starting the campaign earlier because of the limited memory and attention-span of many drivers. Most of them will ignore the changes anyway, until something happens to people who disregard the changes- many police officers are determined that nothing whatsoever will happen to drivers ignoring the new rules as they apply to driver interaction with cyclists, just as they ignore such rules already in place. In many respects, the police is the official opposition to the DfT.

Limited cognitive abilities would surely be an argument for starting a campaign earlier and keeping it going for longer - spaced repetition is a good technique to help people remember stuff.

I just hope the campaign doesn't focus on cyclists having to empathise with motorists struggling with not driving over people.

Avatar
Awavey replied to wtjs | 2 years ago
0 likes

Even more so because it was confirmed in a written answer in parliament from the DfT 10 days ago they were going to do this. And the DfT had confirmed even last year a campaign wouldnt be pushed till the changes were made and as the changes were considered advice which the majority should already be following and not legal changes the amount of publicity would be tailored accordingly.

Plus repeating myself from earlier in the week do people genuinely believe newspapers, tv & radio stations produce all the coverage there has been on highway code changes (and yes we can debate how useful its been) just off their own back ?

Avatar
Jetmans Dad replied to wtjs | 2 years ago
1 like

wtjs wrote:

Unreasonable criticism of the DfT from several quarters here- there was no point starting the campaign earlier because of the limited memory and attention-span of many drivers. 

Sorry, but that is daft ... it implies that drivers will see the message once, and therefore seeing it too early means they will forget it. 

If the campaign is starting now and will run through the Summer, surely it would be more useful to start it at least a month ahead of the change and take a month off the other end, so that drivers have seen it several times before the change and then keep being reminded about it for a while afterwards?

Avatar
HoarseMann | 2 years ago
0 likes

I seem to have subscribed to some sort of department of transport mailing list, so did get this email this afternoon.

Unfortunately they're using some American mailshot company with servers in the USA and the links are for a strange domain "lnks.gd" that my firewall is not happy about. Tracking info in the email link too. So I've not been able to read it!

Avatar
brooksby | 2 years ago
1 like

So shall we start criticising it for its incompetence now, or wait until they put some copy out?  3

Latest Comments