Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Councils spending tens of thousands removing pop-up cycle lanes – plenty of which are working just fine

Cycling UK preparing legal challenge against “knee jerk” removal of infrastructure

Councils are in many cases spending tens of thousands of pounds removing the pop-up cycle lanes installed using emergency active travel funding. Southampton City Council – which will spend almost £37,000 removing one mile of cycle infrastructure – said its Bassett Avenue scheme had been a “positive trial” which had provided “valuable learnings”.

Back in May, Prime Minister Boris Johnson spoke of a “new Golden Age of cycling” having told UK mayors that far more commuters would need to cycle when the nation begins to emerge from lockdown.

In an effort to encourage this, the Department for Transport (DfT) announced a £225m Emergency Active Travel Fund for the construction of walking and cycling infrastructure.

However, since then, many schemes have been removed and ITV reports that this process has, in many cases, proven costly.

As well as the cost of the Bassett Avenue scheme, its report highlights the £25,000 cost of removing a scheme in Southsea and £33,000 spent on removing schemes in Dover, Ashford, Tunbridge Wells and Tonbridge.

The Southsea schemes were removed after only three weeks following complaints from local traders.

Cycling UK has recently expressed alarm that some councils appear to be ripping out cycle lanes in response to objections from a vocal minority rather than based on consideration of the evidence and benefits of the schemes.

Cycling UK prepares for legal challenge against “knee jerk” removal of cycle lanes

Commenting on the removal of the Bassett Avenue scheme, Southampton councillor Steve Leggett, Cabinet Member for Green City and Place, said: "From the outset, we have stressed that all of our pop-up schemes are trials and that we will continuously monitor the changes and feedback received.

“The temporary pop-up cycle lanes on Bassett Avenue were a positive trial that served their purpose well, helping to keep people safe and paving the way for longer-term behaviour change in how people travel in and around Southampton.

“This trial has given us a wealth of valuable learnings to take forward as we continue to develop our plans for cycle infrastructure across the city."

A £781,000 figure is also listed by ITV in connection with the removal of all of West Sussex’s schemes, but it should be noted that this sum also includes the cost of installation.

West Sussex County Council said it had taken the decision to remove all its pop-up infrastructure on the basis that, “the extraordinary environment that led to their installation no longer exists.”

Amongst other things, this means that a segregated cycle lane on Upper Shoreham Road in Shoreham is now due to be removed, even after the council voted to keep it.

Cycling UK has written to the council requesting a pause in the plans, and a clarification of the process which led to the decision.

The council said: "The Government-funded schemes were part of an emergency response in the COVID-19 crisis and were designed to be temporary.

"They fulfilled their main objectives of offering people dedicated space to cycle, rather than using public transport, or to leave the car at home and use their bike instead.

“Some of the temporary cycleways had components that may well have a place in permanent schemes in the future, subject to funding being available, detailed designs being developed and consultation with all stakeholders.

"We have also learned a great deal from public feedback, and data gathered about the cycleways’ usage, which will be invaluable for the future.

"We recognise the support and enthusiasm shown by some people for the Shoreham scheme, which is why we are looking to see if a redesigned, permanent proposal can be progressed. This is subject to there being sufficient funding from the Department for Transport and would require full consultation with the public and all other stakeholders."

Alex has written for more cricket publications than the rest of the team combined. Despite the apparent evidence of this picture, he doesn't especially like cake.

Add new comment


nniff | 3 years ago

'Learnings' - (what a terrible phrase), but chief of which is that a great number of councilors seem to breathe though a hole in the side of their neck.

RoubaixCube | 3 years ago

Oh well... Now they can waste another tens of thousands putting them back in when parts of the UK go into lock down again.

probably wishful thinking but i hope the Government do an audit into how the councils spending money that was given to them to build or improve existing cycling infrastructure 

Im guessing for most councils it was a more a case of minimal effort for maximum profit. a few wands here and there to say they did something then the rest of the money just vanishes and is never spoken of again.

muhasib replied to RoubaixCube | 3 years ago

You're probably onto something there, I would presume the cost of civil works has already been incurred by the council employing the workmen but the additional cost of materials (i.e. bollards/wands) is much lower. Its a good way of shifting the core personnel costs by billing it all to the submitted business case. If the workmen have delayed other work then they will be expected to catchup within existing work hours.

ktache | 3 years ago

I was not aware, just as I am entering the suprising tier 4, that the Covid thing had gone away.

Or that the world wide bike boom had ended...

Rapha Nadal | 3 years ago

"Amongst other things, this means that a segregated cycle lane on Upper Shoreham Road in Shoreham is now due to be removed, even after the council voted to keep it."

Rode down it for the first time today - needs ripping out as it's terrible.  Too narrow, cars parked in the bits that aren't segregated by bollards, full of glass/debris/potholes.  Fucking abysmal.

Rome73 | 3 years ago
1 like

How myopic. 

OldRidgeback replied to Rome73 | 3 years ago

Some of the pop up cycle lanes round my way are really good. Some aren't. It'd be great if the good ones were kept at least. The crap ones don't matter.

Awavey replied to OldRidgeback | 3 years ago

maybe even the bad ones help though, because they start to normalise them as just part of the road system, like bus lanes have become part of the fabric of roads, no-one really questions their existence now even if they arent chock a block with buses.

Whereas like with these cases and the Kensington High street example, the vocal minority gained traction on removing the new cycle lane because the decision makers were easily swayed and failed to recognise the congestion is caused by the multiple metal boxes on 4wheels sat in front of them on the road, and now those lanes have been cleared there is still the same congestion because theres at least the same volume of cars, but there arent calls to widen the road further to speed the cars progress up even more, because then it encroaches on to things like pavements or even buildings that are just accepted as being part and parcel of that roads makeup,whilst the cycle lane was treated as a fad, a one off experiment, and very much temporary.

Secret_squirrel replied to Awavey | 3 years ago
1 like

This (first para)  A thousand time this.

Latest Comments