A new study, conducted to mark Cycle to Work Day on 1 August, has found that almost half of UK-based consumers believe that they cannot afford to buy a bike, with a quarter noting that it would take at least six months for them to save for one.
The survey, carried out by Cycle to Work provider Cyclescheme’s parent company BHN Extras, as part of its annual research into the attitudes and perceptions of, and barriers to, cycling in the UK, also suggests that the costs of accessories, along with concerns about a lack of fitness and “fitting in” with other cyclists, acts as a deterrent to encouraging more people to ride their bikes to work.
However, despite these concerns, the study also found that the number of people cycling to work is rapidly growing, with almost a third of those consumers surveyed commuting by bike, up from 19 per cent last year.
> Cycle commuting mistakes and how to avoid them — our top tips for hassle-free rides to and from work
Carried out by BHN Extras and Cyclescheme, the UK’s largest provider of access to the Cycle to Work scheme, the government’s tax-friendly initiative which has for the last 25 years enabled people to buy a bike and accessories through salary sacrifice, the survey aimed to highlight how the UK feels about cycling and active commuting ahead of the 11th edition of Cycle to Work day on 1 August.
Gathering responses from 2,000 people employed across a range of sectors in the UK, almost two-thirds of whom were aged between 25 and 54, the study found that 49 per cent of those surveyed are not currently in a position to buy a bike outright.
A quarter of those consumers, meanwhile, also stated that it would take at least six months to save to purchase a bike, with 50 per cent noting that they would be most likely to buy a bike by splitting the cost.
Recent research from the Bicycle Association has found that the average price of bikes being sold has risen a staggering 26 per cent since 2019, with – as we reported last year – entry level road bikes such as the Specialized Allez jumping from £600 to £1,100 in the past decade, perhaps owing to some people’s reticence to spend their earnings on a new mode of transport.
> The rising price of entry-level road bikes — how much does it cost to get into road cycling now vs 10 years ago?
Perhaps unsurprisingly, not owning a bike was the biggest barrier to cycling to work for 22 per cent of respondents, while the same percentage claimed that the cost of bikes and accessories acted as a deterrent for potential cycling commuters.
For those who don’t currently cycle, long commutes, a lack of fitness, and concerns about accessibility represent the main barriers to riding to work, with almost half (46 per cent) stating that they are worried they aren’t fit enough to ditch the car and commute by bike.
And with concerns increasingly being raised about sexist abuse and misogyny directed at female cyclists, the perception of cycle commuting being tailored towards young males who live in big cities also stands out as a persistent barrier to cycling, with 58 per cent of respondents believing that they “don’t fit the bill” of what a cyclist represents.
> Cycling retailers demand changes to “flawed” Cycle to Work scheme that puts “business profits well ahead of cycling development”
Nevertheless, the survey also found that the popularity of cycling to work continues to grow. 32 per cent of consumers surveyed currently cycle to work – up from 19 per cent the previous year. This percentage could grow further yet next year, with 34 per cent of consumers considering introducing cycling to their commute.
42 per cent also noted that cycling could cover at least part of their commute to work, and – in the kind of numbers likely to be welcomed by Cyclescheme – 67 per cent said they’d be more likely to start cycling if their employer provided support.
Finally, the research found that three quarters of those who cycle agree that they discovered several more benefits since they started than before, and that 47 per cent of people believe that cycling will have the biggest impact on their mental health.
> “Would they like the shirt off my back as well?” Bike shop owners fume as Cycle to Work scheme stops retailers charging additional fees
“It is clear that people want to cycle to work and with it being the 25th anniversary of the Cycle to Work Scheme and an Olympic year – the timing could not be better,” Adrian Warren, a senior director at BHN, said in a statement announcing the survey.
“But there are also barriers that need to be addressed. Whether it’s the upfront cost of bikes, levels of fitness, or feeling like you’re not the ‘typical’ demographic, cycling has significant benefits from better mental health and less impact on the environment.
“It’s interesting that so many people said they would be more likely to cycle if they had support from their employers. There is cost effective support out there that can help overcome many of the barriers. Cycle to Work Schemes for example, are offered through employment and help to spread the cost of bikes and accessories through salary sacrifices.”
Meanwhile ex-England rugby captain, World Cup winner, and keen cyclist Jason Robinson added: “Physical health has always been a huge part of my life, but it can be hard to fit it into a busy schedule.
“For many, cycling to work can be a convenient way to build exercise into their daily routines. Not fitting the typical demographic might be off putting for some but cycling is an activity for all, no matter where you live, your age or fitness ability – everyone can make the most of the many benefits associated with cycling.”
> "Cycle to work schemes are sucking the lifeblood out of cycle shops": Bike shops tell Parliamentary Committee of "need for urgent systemic change" to Cycle to Work scheme
The 2024 Cycle to Work day, its 11th edition, comes after a turbulent year for both Cyclescheme and the Cycle to Work initiative in general.
In January, the Association of Cycle Traders (ACT) and senior figures from cycling retailers met with MPs from the All Party Parliamentary Group for Cycling & Walking (APPGCW) to make their case about the “need for urgent systematic change” to Cycle to Work scheme, arguing that the scheme as it currently stands is “too complicated”, damaging to retailers, and no longer fit for purpose to get people cycling to work.
The meeting came two months after the ACT and bike shops hit back at Cyclescheme, the initiative’s largest provider, for deciding to prevent retailers from charging additional fees on bikes purchased under the scheme, a move described by the representative of independent cycle retailers at the time as “infuriating”, “incredibly short-sighted”, and the “straw that broke the camel’s back”.
Add new comment
74 comments
I used to commute by cycle ; including the two - 20c winters, circa 2008/9 if memory serves. Not any more, no way, no how, never again. Stopped in 2018. Banana Republic roads full of potholes. The close passes just keep getting 'closer' and more frequent. Mind I do live in the Bradford Met. A group of Norwegians told me that it, Bradford , was the Wild West of driving. They are not wrong.
A quick poll here and 100% of repondents say that the survey was probably biased and the questions therefore shite. 100% of respondents in this poll also said they were struggling to find a pinch of salt.
Its utter bollocks of the same magnitude as "cyclists fink they own the road" and "cyclists are the most dangerous thing on the road".
If you can't afford a bike, yes, even a new one then you are in very deep financial trouble and I would suggest that based on what I see around me every day, most people are not in deep financial trouble unless its entirely of their own making.
The average age and value of cars on our roads is insane. The amount of deliveroo drivers I see taking massively overpriced food all over the place is crazy. The number of people I see buying fast food/takeaway every day of the week is crazy. The amount of crap everyone orders from amazon is mad. The amount people spend down the pub is silly.
Its just another stupid question that has no relevance to reality when there is absolutely no follow up or questioning behind it. Thats like asking people if Brexit was a good idea and saying "Brexit was a good idea because half the population say so".
You are JD Vance and I claim my $5
You might have to explain this to me...
Vance is the intelligent version of Donald Trump, Trump's running mate, and even nastier. Wonder who would have benefited most if that bullet had done more than nick Trump's ear?
He's on record as describing #45 as 'the American Hitler' and various other dismissals of his fitness for office.
#45 on record saying 'that he didn't know me and now that he does, we get along fine'.
So both put their personal pursuit of power above integrity.
As one commentator put it, JDV has no convictions but DJT has 34 (felony) convictions so some to spare...
The voters choice is dictatorship or democracy so choose wisely.
Dictatorship means no further choice as he will do whatever he wants. That's it, you're done.
Democracy means another choice in four years and no regrets. Vote 💙
Fewer people than ever use pubs. Maybe those who do use them also have a bike. You don't see those who don't because they can't afford to go out. Cost of roof overhead and bed to sleep in takes vast proportion of household income compared with a decade or more ago. I really didn't think cycling people were as nasty as your comment, unless you're being sarcastic
'Cycling people' come in all kinds of packages and flavours, good and bad, just like people in pretty much any other grouping you care to mention. Almost like they're just... well... people.
True. Cos there's been some really intolerant wealth-shaming BTL on this article, IMO
I would love to cycle to work but the idea of 20k down the A57 in rush hour terrifies me... it's definitely the idea of sharing space with white vans and wankpanzers that put me off.
Putting aside all the comments regarding how many and who can or can't afford a bike (in reality anyone who wants a bike can have one whether it's bought new, used, or received from charitable source), the upshot is that this so-called "research" was commissioned by a company that has a financial interest in getting as many people as possible to repeatedly buy new bikes via a salary sacrifice scheme, within which they charge one of the highest commission fees in the industry. As with most "surveys" the organisation paying the bill gets the outcome they ask for.
Lot of people don't have space to store a bike. Certainly don't have space for tools and spares and have never had background fixing things. Daughter's bike was taken by someone cutting the iron railing it was locked to (cordless angle grinders cost very little). She was house sharing with no space to keep it indoors. Now she has a house - 3 bed 19th century terrace, baby, no space to store bike or take through house that has no space to pavement. Just 80 steps to DLR with buses and mainline railway 5 minutes away... no need for car or bike
Alright, understood, but what's that got to do with the affordability of bikes? Or indeed a bike scheme company commissioning a survey saying nobody can afford a bike? My life would be different if I lived 80 paces from DLR, but I live in south Dorset, no public transport worth mentioning, have a van, EV car, 12 bikes, a workshop, and space to keep it all.
The price I pay for not living in that London.
Alright already, we're envious, no need to rub it in! 😉
An incredible bicycle workshop...
Well, thank you very much
What a joke.
I spent £50 on a second hand mountain bike in 2011 which I use to commute.
I still use it now, and would reckon I've done 10'000 miles on it in total.
No expensive gear, just helmet, gloves, lights and waterproofs (which I've hardly ever use as it rarely rains enough to warrant it).
Anyone new to cycling doesn't need to spend thousands of pounds initially untill they know they will continue and want to upgrade.
Excellent. I've rebuilt numerous such bikes for friends and relatives... but cost to make them thoroughly roadworthy could hit £150 to £200: bomb proof tyres, tubes, rim tape, chain, cassette, cables, brake pads, saddle (originals often cracked), decent lights... add mudguards, rack, panniers if needed. Still gets a bike that pays for itself on most commuter routes in 3 to 6 months
I bought a new bike in Halfords for 200 pounds. A nice bike for a 3 mile commute.
Halfords do some great value for money bikes. Their ability to build and service them however, is dangerously inconsistent, so I'd get it checked over elsewhere if you aren't confident with the spanners yourself.
Since second hand bikes can be had for as little as £0 if you look around the headline should be edited to include the word "new"
I've given a couple of extra bikes away to friends over the years, plus another to a scheme supporting the low-waged and another to my son's old school.
I gave away bikes in lockdown and rebuilt bikes owned but rarely used by friends. Then had to get a replacement town bike with fat tyres due to state of roads
Maybe. But it's a survey of peoples' attitudes, not of facts, and if lots of people (wrongly) believe that they can't afford a bike then that's what they believe, and that's the problem that needs to be addressed.
Er, seems like this is perhaps a bit back-to-front. If anything, decreased demand (reticence to spend) ought to lead to falling prices. On the other hand, that reticence may be 'owing to' the increased prices.
"a staggering 26%" corresponds with a Bank of England inflation calculator average of 24%. Staggeringly similar. If only my income had kept pace...
Given that there were 41.2 million registered vehicles in the UK at the end of 2023, and that according to the 2021 census there were 37.5 million people of working age, it would be interesting to know how many of those surveyed don't think they can afford a bike because they already spend a proportion of their income on owning a car.
Or cigarettes or booze? Plus what price range are they talking about?
Pages