It’s not that often you see a whole new range in the UK, especially from a brand that already sells nearly 200,000 bikes a year. Cycle 2008 is the first time we’ve seen Austrian bikemongers KTM in the UK. They’ve been around since 1964 making motorbikes, pushbikes and, erm, radiators, and their range encompasses pretty much everything from downhill monsters to dutch bikes. We’re mostly interested in road and urban machines of course, but we can only really tell you about the road side: KTM may have been testing the water in the UK for some time now but they clearly haven’t had their finger on the pulse as regards the city bike and commuting explosion, and they didn’t bring a single hybrid to the show. Pity. In total the range includes some 220 models, and KTM aren’t looking for a UK distributor but rolling out the service that they use in the rest of Europe, which is to ship the bikes direct, for free, to any bike shop that orders more than three of them. Not bad. What they did bring was lots of tasty road irons ranging from £699 to £4,299. The Di2-equipped Revelator Prestige, at a right-arm-off-cutting £6,799, wasn’t available as Shimano don’t really have any production Di2 to speak of. There’s three platforms – monocoque carbon, bonded carbon and Aluminium – and a variety of builds for each one, with Shimano transmissions and good quality finishing gear from Ricthey and Selle Italia among others. All the bikes are designed and developed at KTM’s Austrian HQ: the frames are produced in China and sent back for painting and assembly. The top end bikes are each hand-assembled by one person to ensure that the quality control is the best it can be, though we’re not sure how top end the bikes need to be to get this personal treatment. The Revelator carbon monocoque is, well, a nice-looking carbon monocoque to go with all the other nice-looking carbon monocoques at the show. KTM don’t rebrand but design all frames from scratch (they’ve got patents pending for dropouts and tube bending, they say…) so you can at least be sure you’re not getting a rebadged or generic frame. The Dura-Ace equipped Revelator Prime weighted in at a svelte 14.7lb on the road.cc scales, the same spec on the bonded carbon Strada frame is £1300 less and just under a pound heavier at 15.5lb. The £699 base model Alu Strada is a fairly respectable 21.3lb. KTM are pushing hard to at the doors of the UK market, and their distribution model means that independent shops can take a punt without risking too much capital, so we’d expect to see them popping up around the country. And we’re hoping that one’ll be popping up at the road.cc offices too, so we can give it a proper ride.
The KTM Strada monocoque with Dura Ace 7900 comes in at a penny under three grand
Entry level Strada Alu has a full Tiagra groupset
KTM bikes give Britain a go
Add as a preferred source on Google
Help us to bring you the best cycling content
If you’ve enjoyed this article, then please consider subscribing to road.cc from as little as £2.49. Our mission is to bring you all the news that’s relevant to you as a cyclist, independent reviews, impartial buying advice and more. Your subscription will help us to do more.
No Comments
Read more...
Read more...
Read more...
Latest Comments
@SVXY Rule 66 of the highway code says you can ride two abreast but to also 'be considerate of the needs of other road users when riding in groups.' It does not say you can ride three or four abreast which would not be considerate of the needs of other road users. As the highway code is used by prosecution lawyers as evidence to convict in Road Traffic Act offences cases you certainly could therefore be prosecuted and convicted for careless cycling if cycling three or four abreast
@SVXY This is a curious tactic - rebutting your own argument with your very next sentence.
Affordable? Starting at £6K? You 'having a larf?
@SVXY Ah, so it *is* the "flood the zone with shit" argumentation technique then? Or perhaps ... you are genuinely unclear about the difference between the Highway code and the law (and perhaps the difference between cyclists, drivers and indeed horse riders? And rusty on safe practice? As mdavidford notes you appear to be confusing rule with Rule 66 (for cyclists, which doesn't say anything about not riding x abreast) with Rule 53 (for horse riders which gives guidance not to more than double up - I don't think this is a direct summary of any law since "should" not "must"). Charitably I'm going with "*i* know what it says!" which as I noted many of people feel they do. Anyway away with you, I feel you've had your fill of attention for today.
Road tax was abolished in 1937 by Winston Churchill because, as he said, "road tax makes motorists believe they are the moral owners of our roads." He got that right.
@SVXY None of the magistrates who sentenced him said the CPS should have charged him with dangerous driving. Why should they? He was not speeding, he was not on his phone and he was not drunk or under the influence of drugs either
@SVXY The court does not decide on whether someone was driving carelessly or dangerously, they can only decide on the guilt or otherwise of the defendant on the charge the CPS decides to lay against them. The CPS is notorious for preferring to charge careless rather than dangerous because it's an easier win; this results in entirely unjust sentences such as this one.
@Rendel Harris Wearing sandals may be fine if cycling on tracks over fields or in a quiet residential street with a 20 or 30mph limit. It is not sensible cycling on a 60mph main road
@chrisonabike maybe, but things that used to be banter & jokes in the 1960s/1970s have (thankfully) become socially unacceptable , and this is mostly because enough people spoke up about it. We even managed to make drink-driving a lot less acceptable, by the same means.
@Rendel Harris Yes, he was driving at 55mph in a 60mph road. The court verdict was he was not driving dangerously but carelessly eg he should have had his visor down to keep out the sun so he could monitor the road ahead.
