Lance Armstrong may have let the legal deadline for launching a defamation case against Flloyd Landis pass, but the UCI and its current and former presidents, Pat McQuaid and Hein Verbruggen are not it seems going to let things lie as they today announced they were initiating legal proceedings against Landis in the Swiss courts.
In a short to the point of terse press statement the UCI confirmed the move and said:
"By this step, made necessary by numerous unacceptable public statements by Mr Landis, the UCI is seeking to defend the integrity of the cycling movement as a whole against the accusations of a rider who, by breaching the Anti-doping Rules, caused cycling serious harm."
Last year in a sworn statement given to the Wall Street Journal Landis accused Armstrong and the US Postal team of initiating a programme of systematic doping and said that the UCI and its then President, Hein Verbruggen, had colluded in covering up a dope test that Landis alleged Armstrong had failed at the 2002 edition of the Tour de Suisse. All parties have vehemently denied the accusations and the UCI had already called in its lawyers and warned Landis last May that it would "undertake all necessary measures to defend its honour as well as the honour of all its executives who have been unfairly accused by Mr Floyd Landis."
Armstrong by contrast has not taken the legal route instead calling in to question Landis's own credibility – citing the disgraced former rider's own long running campaign against his conviction for doping at the 2006 Tour which ended suddenly when Landis admitted his guilt.
Speaking last year at the Tour of California when the Landis allegations against him first surfaced Armstrong said:
"He has nothing, he has no proof, it's his word against ours", added Armstrong. "We like our word. We like where we stand. We like our credibility. I don't there's a lot of credibility on the other side."
“We have nothing to hide. We have nothing to run from. I can give you one word to sum this all up. It’s credibility. Floyd lost his credibility a long time ago.”
At the same time UCI President Pat McQuaid angrily rebutted Landis's claims saying that the only thing that they proved, "is that he’s a liar. He has stood up in court and denied these things. He’s got absolutely no credibility."
Mr Landis will now get the opportunity to stand up in court again this time though a Swiss court with the UCI electing to play this one on home turf.
In the meantime the world awaits the outcome of the investigation in to the Lanids claims against Armstrong and his ex-US Postal team mates by Special Agent Jeff Novitzky of the Food & Drug Administration (FDA) which one way or another is likely also to prove something of a bumper payday for lawyers in any number of the world's legal juridictions.
Tough stage to call. Suited all of GC, KOM and breakaaway riders... not helped by the fact it was much harder than it looked on the profile....
How can it do the one without doing the other (Newton's 3rd law)?
He later won his appeal (having lost two jobs over it) but he was prosecuted "under section 127(1) of the Communications Act 2003, which prohibits...
"cycle like you drive" huh?
Yet again, a scheme which excluded cyclists, leading to danger, congestion and the deterring of many people who want to cycle. We've had pro...
Suspected driver arrested after crashing into Poultry Cross in Salisbury...
Milton Keynes is much appreciated by those that live here and much maligned by the ignorant.
“While the car driver could have waited until both them and the cyclist had turned the corner, in this instance the manner of driving did not...
Those left-out details include, from what I'm reading, that allegedly Strickland bought guns for himself and Armstrong, that being the gun used by...
But what if you are racing, but doing an endurance race, like the Transcontinental?