A nasty crash in the Vuelta yesterday led to a number of abandons, including overall contender Rigoberto Uran, former race leader Nicolas Roche and Britain’s Hugh Carthy.
“Today we’ve had a really tough day, there was a crash on a descent on a corner, and there were a number of riders who went down, there was no possibility to avoid the crash,” said Urán.
“Us riders, we are used to having these crashes so we know what it takes to recuperate from them. There’s no other option, we just have to take some time out and recover to then come back. I’ve learned a lot about this, each time you learn a bit more, you go out there hoping not to crash or at least to not break anything.”
Uran’s team-mate Carthy added: “If I look at the work we’ve done this week, we can be happy. The team now can look forward and continue racing. I wish them luck.
“I’m all OK – nothing too serious. Could have been a lot worse. I’m thankful for the help from the team and the hospital. I’m looking forward to recovery now.”
Roche was a little less phlegmatic.
“There’s not much to say. I think this is one of the biggest disappointments I’ve had in my career. I’d worked so hard to get back to this level and it was a new opportunity to show that I was at this level again.
“There’s nothing broken which is the good point. I have some stitches in my forearm and pain in my quadriceps which is why I could not continue.”
Add new comment
14 comments
UCI worldcup cross country was on last night, now on BBC iPlayer. Downhill on tonight on the red button, at some point, maybe, and on iPlayer later, hopefully.
When in Melbourne, I quite fancied picking up a $5 helmet or three. They were meant to be available in convenience stores across the city but the availability was basically zero. Maybe that's why the scheme failed.
"... the bike share scheme was quite small for a city of this size."
Proof, if it were needed, that you can waste a lot of money by not spending enough to make it work properly. If there are not enough share bikes around so people can rely on them, they won't be used.
I thought that was uniquely a British politicians' disease, forever spending just too little to make something a success and then pulling the plug, but it seems Oz has caught it too
Of course, there is also the whole helmet thing, police standing right by the share bike racks and fining anyone who used the bike without a helmet, and lack of separate infrastructure... But right now with a global warming crisis, it is no time to be giving up on cycle schemes, but trying harder.
I can't believe that Australia still has its helmet laws after all these years of being cited all round the world as an example of why not to make helmets compulsory. We have to remove these impediments as a matter of urgency.
Regardless of the reasons offered for the poor performance of the bike share scheme in Melbourne, MHL was one of its defining issues. MHL proved to be an inconvenience to anyone who wanted to use the scheme, you either had to be carrying a helmet around with you or you had to hunt down a near by 7Eleven to purchase one. Just take the spontaneity right out of riding a bike share bike.
The free tram zone was introduced at the start of 2015, by then the bike share scheme has been going for four years with little up take mainly due again to the elephant in the room. The Govinator got pinged here once for ride said share bike with out a helmet. So why bother.
Regards from a Melbournian
ReadyBike didn't work in Reading, but then we did have Counciller Tony Page being in charge of cycling.
Well, there is a pattern. Bike share works in places where there is no helmet law, and it doesn't work in places where there are helmet laws, but I'm sure it's just a coincidence.
Doesn't help that cyclists in Oz seem to be treated rather worse than serial killers.
It is a coincidence. Helmets are compulsory in Vancovuer and the popular bike share systems just lock a helmet to the bike. When you unlock the bike the helmet is freed. Some people put the helmet in the basket and ride without it. It's a non-issue.
The relevant part is your serial killer comment. Unfortunately that is true.
So is there any explanation why that approach has not been attempted in other bike-share schemes where there are helmet laws? I don't know, but I suspect there's a reason why they haven't gone that way. Perhaps they reckon the helmet stock would suffer a high attrition rate? Or maybe they fear an epidemic of head-lice!
They do fear exactly that, which is why helmet sharing has also failed. As flat4 makes clear, many people don't use the helmet but there are no consequences, so there isn't really a helmet law there.
Probably not a coincidence, as if you can ride without a helmet and there are no consequences, then helmets aren't compulsory, which is why the scheme hasn't failed. I, and many other people, would be extremely wary of putting on a helmet which had been worn by hundreds of others, so if the helmet law was enforced, I suspect bike usage would plummet.
Re: Aussie failure with regard to bike hire (warning, it's quite old but still relevant):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hPjvZlAl_js
It’s Australia. Politicians barely tolerate cycling, why would they do anything to encourage it? A bike share scheme that they contracted to the RACV to operate, is there any wonder it failed? As if a motorists association is committed to the promotion of cycling…
When cycle when you be can hooning in a v8 ute?
Proves it, compulsory helmet laws do prevent cycling head injury!